Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) versus Standard Laparoscopic Left Donor Nephrectomy: Matched-pair Comparison

European Urology

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 95-101

  Canes, David ^a   Berger, Andre ^b   Aron, Monish ^b   Brandina, Ricardo ^b   Goldfarb, David A ^b   Shoskes, Daniel ^b   Desai, Mihir M ^b   Gill, Inderbir S ^c  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Donor nephrectomy; Laparo Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) surgery; Laparoscopy; Single port

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WARM ISCHEMIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449529668     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ratner L.E., Ciseck L.J., Moore R.G., Cigarroa F.G., Kaufman H.S., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 15 (1995) 1047-1049
2. Philosophe B., Kuo P.C., Schweitzer E.J., et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68 (1999) 497-502
3. Derweesh I.H., Goldfarb D.A., Abreu S.C., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65 (2005) 862-866
4. Troppmann C., Perez R.V., and McBride M. Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: an OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation 85 (2008) 916-919
5. Canes D., Desai M.M., Aron M., et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54 (2008) 1020-1030
6. Desai M.M., Rao P.P., Aron M., et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101 (2008) 83-88
7. Raman J.D., Bensalah K., Bagrodia A., Stern J.M., and Cadeddu J.A. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 70 (2007) 1039-1042
8. Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. Surg Endosc. In press.
9. Ratner L.E., Hiller J., Sroka M., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 3402-3403
10. Kuo P.C., and Johnson L.B. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: a center-specific microeconomic analysis. Transplantation 69 (2000) 2211-2213
11. Gill I.S., Canes D., Aron M., et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 180 (2008) 637-641
12. Soble J.J., and Gill I.S. Needlescopic urology: incorporating 2-mm instruments in laparoscopic surgery. Urology 52 (1998) 187-194
13. Alston C., Spaliviero M., and Gill I.S. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 65 (2005) 833-839
14. Hadjianastassiou V.G., Johnson R.J., Rudge C.J., and Mamode N. 2509 living donor nephrectomies, morbidity and mortality, including the UK introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery. Am J Transplant 7 (2007) 2532-2537
15. Tisdale B.E., Kapoor A., Hussain A., Piercey K., and Whelan J.P. Intact specimen extraction in laparoscopic nephrectomy procedures: Pfannenstiel versus expanded port site incisions. Urology 69 (2007) 241-244
16. Whiteside J.L., Barber M.D., Walters M.D., and Falcone T. Anatomy of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in relation to trocar placement and low transverse incisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 1574-1578
17. Simforoosh N., Basiri A., Shakhssalim N., Ziaee S.A., Tabibi A., and Moghaddam S.M. Effect of warm ischemia on graft outcome in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 20 (2006) 895-898
18. Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G., et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177 (2007) 929-931
19. Kocak B., Baker T.B., Koffron A.J., and Leventhal J.R. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a single-center sequential experience comparing hand-assisted versus standard technique. Urology 70 (2007) 1060-1063
20. Raman J.D., Bagrodia A., and Cadeddu J.A. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 55 (2009) 1198-1206