메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 149-153

A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Drainage; Lymphocyst; Radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

AMPICILLIN; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; TINIDAZOLE;

EID: 0036592789     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00027.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (25)

References (24)
  • 2
    • 0000137392 scopus 로고
    • Extensive abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy
    • In: Coppleson M, Monaghan JM, Morrow CP, Tattersall MHN (eds); Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
    • (1992) Gynecologic Oncology, 2nd edn. , pp. 1205-1256
    • Thompson, J.D.1
  • 8
    • 0029003907 scopus 로고
    • Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical hysterectomy for stage IB cervical cancer
    • (1995) Gynecol Oncol , vol.57 , pp. 232-234
    • Patsner, B.1
  • 24
    • 85030046509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ACOG educational bulletin. Lower urinary tract operative injuries
    • (1997) Int J Gynecol Obstet , vol.58 , pp. 67-72


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.