|
Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 149-153
|
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
|
Author keywords
Cervical cancer; Drainage; Lymphocyst; Radical hysterectomy
|
Indexed keywords
AMPICILLIN;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
TINIDAZOLE;
ABDOMINAL ANGIOGRAPHY;
ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE;
ADULT;
AGE;
AGED;
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS;
ARTICLE;
BLADDER INJURY;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY;
CANCER INVASION;
CANCER RADIOTHERAPY;
CANCER SIZE;
CANCER STAGING;
CELLULITIS;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA;
FEMALE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INFECTION;
INFERIOR CAVA VEIN;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MORBIDITY;
OPERATION DURATION;
PELVIC DISEASE;
PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY;
PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RETROPERITONEUM;
SAFETY;
TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
URINARY TRACT INFECTION;
UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;
VEIN INJURY;
WOUND INFECTION;
ADULT;
AGED;
CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL;
DRAINAGE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYSTERECTOMY;
LYMPH NODE EXCISION;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0036592789
PISSN: 13418076
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00027.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (24)
|