Relationships of retinal structure and humphrey 24-2 visual field thresholds in patients With glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 259-271

  Bogunović, Hrvoje ^a   Kwon, Young H ^b,c   Rashid, Adnan ^a   Lee, Kyungmoo ^a   Critser, Douglas B ^c   Garvin, Mona K ^a   Sonka, Milan ^a,c   Abràmoff, Michael D ^a,b,c,d  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Ganglion cell; Image analysis; OCT; Perimetry; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMPHREY PERIMETER; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINAL THICKNESS; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISION; VISUAL THRESHOLD; ADOLESCENT; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL FIELD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921310306     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15885     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Weinreb RN, Anton-Lopez A. Glaucoma Definition and Classification. Oxford Medical Publications. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
2. Danias J, Shen F, Kavalarakis M, et al. Characterization of retinal damage in the episcleral vein cauterization rat glaucoma model. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:219-228.
3. Kwon YH, Fingert JH, Kuehn MH, Alward WL. Primary openangle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1113-1124.
4. Lee K, Kwon YH, Garvin MK, Niemeijer M, Sonka M, Abramoff MD. Distribution of damage to the entire retinal ganglion cell pathway: quantified using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1118-1126.
5. AAO PPP Glaucoma Panel, Hoskins Center for Quality Eye Care. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma PPP. 2010. Available at: http://one.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/primaryopenangle- glaucoma-ppp--october-2010. Accessed December 8, 2014.
6. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130- 135.
7. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:417-421.
8. Wall M, Johnson CA, Kutzko KE, Nguyen R, Brito C, Keltner JL. Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:53-61.
9. Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop KI. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1083-1089.
10. Wojtkowski M, Leitgeb R, Kowalczyk A, Bajraszewski T, Fercher AF. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Optics. 2002;7:457- 463.
11. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters. 2003;28:2067-2069.
12. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Fujimoto JG, et al. Threedimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1734-1746.
13. Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Lee K, Niemeijer M, Sonka M, Kwon YH. 2-D pattern of nerve fiber bundles in glaucoma emerging from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:483-489.
14. Lee K, Niemeijer M, Garvin MK, Kwon YH, Sonka M, Abramoff MD. Segmentation of the optic disc in 3-D OCT scans of the optic nerve head. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:159- 168.
15. Abramoff MD, Garvin M, Sonka M. Retinal imaging and image analysis. IEEE Rev Biomed Engin. 2010;3:169-208.
16. Mwanza JC, Gendy MG, Feuer WJ, Shi W, Budenz DL. Effects of changing operators and instruments on time-domain and spectral-domain OCT measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42:328- 337.
17. Mwanza JC, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ. Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: automated detection and thickness reproducibility with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8323-8329.
18. Abramoff MD, Mullins RF, Lee K, et al. Human photoreceptor outer segments shorten during light adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:3721-3728.
19. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure-function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50;4254- 4266.
20. Bogunovic H, Sonka M, Kwon Y, Kemp P, Abramoff MD, Xiaodong W. Multi-surface and multi-field co-segmentation of 3-D retinal optical coherence tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2014;32:2242-2253.
21. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809-1815.
22. Wahle A, Lee K, Harding AT, et al. Extending the XNAT archive tool for image and analysis management in ophthalmology research. Proc. SPIE 8674, Medical Imaging 2013: Advanced PACS-based Imaging Informatics and Therapeutic Applications, 86740M; 2013.
23. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst. 2008;110:346- 359.
24. Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Wu X, Russell SR, Burns TL, Sonka M. Automated 3-D intraretinal layer segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1436-1447.
25. Quellec G, Lee K, Dolejsi M, Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Sonka M. Three-dimensional analysis of retinal layer texture: identification of fluid-filled regions in SD-OCT of the macula. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:1321-1330.
26. Pochet NL, Suykens JA. Support vector machines versus logistic regression: improving prospective performance in clinical decision-making. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 27:607-608.
27. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision. 4th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning; 2014.
28. Hood DC, Raza AS, de Moraes CGV, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;32:1-21.
29. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2654-2659.
30. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Sturmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:63-68.
31. Strouthidis NG, Gardiner SK, Sinapis C, Burgoyne CF, Garway- Heath DF. The spatial pattern of neuroretinal rim loss in ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3737-3742.
32. See JLS, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC. Rates of neuroretinal rim and peripapillary atrophy area change: a comparative study of glaucoma patients and normal controls. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:840-847.
33. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:333- 354.
34. Zhu H, Crabb DP, Schlottmann PG, et al. Predicting visual function from the measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5657-5666.
35. Mwanza JC, Budenz DL, Godfrey DG, et al. Diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:849-854.
36. Zhang X, Bregman CJ, Raza AS, De Moraes G, Hood DC. Deriving visual field loss based upon OCT of inner retinal thicknesses of the macula. Biomed Opt Express. 2011;2:1734- 1742.
37. Zhang X, Raza AS, Hood DC. Detecting glaucoma with visual fields derived from frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:3289-3296.
38. Jansonius NM, Nevalainen J, Selig B, et al. A mathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina. Vision Res. 2009;49:2157- 2163.
39. Jansonius NM, Schiefer J, Nevalainen J, Paetzold J, Schiefer U. A mathematical model for describing the retinal nerve fiber bundle trajectories in the human eye: average course, variability, and influence of refraction, optic disc size and optic disc position. Exp Eye Res. 2012;105:70-78.
40. Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:974- 979.
41. Quellec G, Abramoff MD. Estimating maximal measurable performance for automated decision systems from the characteristics of the reference standard. Application to diabetic retinopathy screening. Paper presented at: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; August 26-30, 2014; Chicago, IL. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/ articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=6943552. Accessed December 24, 2014.