Gender inequalities in academic innovation and enterprise: A bourdieuian analysis

British Journal of Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 109-125

  Karataş Özkan, Mine ^a   Chell, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921056830     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: 14678551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12020     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Acker, J. (1998). 'The future of "gender and organisations": connections and boundaries', Gender, Work and Organization, 5, pp. 195-206.
2. Adkins, L. (2004). 'Introduction: feminism, Bourdieu and after'. In L. Adkins and B. Skeggs (eds), Feminism After Bourdieu, pp. 3-18. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Allen, S. and C. Truman (1991). 'Prospects for women's businesses and self employment in the year 2000'. In J. Curran and R. Blackburn (eds), Paths of Enterprise, pp. 114-127. London: Routledge.
4. Anderson, A. R., S. Drakopoulou-Dodd and S. Jack (2010). 'Network practices and entrepreneurial growth', Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, pp. 121-133.
5. Auster, E. R. (1990). 'Network theory, tools, and applications'. In F. Williams and D. V. Gibson (eds), The Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective, pp. 63-89. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Bendl, R. (2008). 'Gender subtexts - reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse', British Journal of Management, 19, pp. 50-64.
7. Benschop, Y. and M. Brouns (2003). 'Crumbling ivory towers: academic organising and its gender effects', Gender, Work and Organization, 10, pp. 194-212.
8. Bercovitz, J. and M. Feldman (2006). 'Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 175-188.
9. Bird, S. R. (2011). 'Unsettling universities' incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: a case study approach', Gender, Work and Organization, 18, pp. 202-229.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1986). 'The Forms of Capital'. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Capital. New York, NY: J.G. Richardson, Greenwood Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (1989). 'Social space and symbolic power', Sociological Theory, 7, pp. 14-25.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1992). 'Thinking about limits', Theory, Culture and Society, 9, pp. 37-49.
15. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
16. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of Resistance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1999). 'Understanding'. In P. Bourdieu (ed.), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, pp. 607-626. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20. Bourdieu, P. (2003). 'Participant objectivation', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, pp. 282-294.
21. Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Bradley, H. (2007). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Bruni, A., S. Gherardi and B. Poggio (2004). 'Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: an ethnographic account of intertwined practices', Gender, Work and Organization, 11, pp. 407-429.
24. Cardozo, R., A. Ardichvili and A. Strauss (2011). 'Effectiveness of university technology transfer: an organizational population ecology view of a maturing supplier industry', Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, pp. 173-202.
25. Carter, R. and G. Kirkup (1990). Women in Engineering - A Good Place to Be? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
26. Chia, R. and R. Holt (2006). 'Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective', Organization Studies, 27, pp. 635-655.
27. Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-how. London: Pluto Press.
28. Cohen, L and G. Musson (2000). 'Entrepreneurial identities: reflections from two case studies', Organization, 7, pp. 31-48.
29. Colombo, M., D. D'Adda and E. Piva (2010). 'The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis', Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, pp. 1-25.
30. Corley, K. and D. Gioia (2011). 'Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution?' Academy of Management Review, 36, pp. 12-32.
31. Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger and C. Schneider (2011). 'The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions', Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9214-y.
32. De Bruin, A., C. G. Brush and F. Welter (2007). 'Advancing a framework for coherent research on women's entrepreneurship', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, pp. 323-339.
33. De Clercq, D. and M. Voronov (2009). 'The role of domination in newcomers' legitimation as entrepreneurs', Organization, 16, pp. 799-827.
34. D'Este, P. and M. Perkmann (2011). 'Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations', Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, pp. 316-339.
35. Ely, R. J. and D. E. Meyerson (2000). 'Theories of gender in organizations: a new approach to organizational analysis and change', Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, pp. 103-151.
36. ENWISE (2004). Waste of Talents: Turning Private Struggles into a Public Issue; Women and science in the Enwise countries. Brussels: European Commission.
37. ETAN (2000). Science Policies in the European Union: Promoting Excellence through Mainstreaming Gender Equality. Brussels: European Commission Research Directorate.
38. Finlay, L. (2002). 'Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice', Qualitative Research, 2, pp. 209-230.
39. Foresight (2010). Technology and Innovation Futures: UK Growth Opportunities for the 2020s. London: Government Office for Science.
40. Foresight (2012). Technology and Innovation Futures: UK Growth Opportunities for the 2020s - 2012 Refresh. London: Government Office for Science.
41. Gherardi, S. and B. Poggio (2007). Gendertelling in Organizations: Narratives from Male Dominated Environments. Stockholm: Liber AB.
42. Goldhor, R. S. and R. T. Lund (1983). 'University to industry advanced technology transfer: a case study', Research Policy, 12, pp. 121-152.
43. Golshorki, D., B. Leca, M. Lounsbury and C. Raminez (2009). 'Analysing, accounting for and unmasking domination: on our role as scholars of practice, practitioners of social science and public intellectuals'. Organization, 16, pp. 779-797.
44. Gomez, M-L. (2010). 'A Bourdieusian perspective on strategising'. In D. Golshorki etal. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy-as-Practice, pp. 141-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Goode, J. and B. Bagilhole (1998). 'Gendering the management of change in higher education: a case study', Gender, Work and Organization, 5, pp. 148-164.
46. Gray, C. (1998). Enterprise and Culture. London: Routledge.
47. Gulbranson, C. A. and D. B. Audretsch (2008). 'Proof of concept centres: accelerating the commercialisation of university innovation', Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, pp. 249-258.
48. Haeussler, C. and J. A. Colyvas (2011). 'Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany', Research Policy, 40, pp. 41-54.
49. Harker, R., C. Mahar and C. Wilkes (eds) (1990). An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu. London: Macmillan.
50. Harmon, B., A. Ardishvili, R. Cardozo, T. Elder, J. Leuthold, J. Parshall, M. Raghian and D. Smith (1997). 'Mapping the university technology transfer process', Journal of Business Venturing, 12, pp. 423-434.
51. Hayter, C. (2011). 'In search of the profit-maximising actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs', Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, pp. 340-352.
52. Karakayali, N. (2004). 'Reading Bourdieu with Adorno: the limits of critical theory and reflexive sociology', Sociology, 38, pp. 351-368.
53. Karataş-Özkan, M. (2011). 'Understanding relational qualities of entrepreneurial learning: towards a multi-layered approach', Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23, pp. 877-906.
54. Karataş-Özkan, M. and E. Chell (2010). Nascent Entrepreneurship and Learning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
55. Kelly, A. (1987). Science for Girls. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
56. Kerfoot, D. and D. Knights (1999). '"Man" management: ironies of modern management in an "old" university'. In S. Whitehead and R. Moodley (eds), Transforming Managers: Gendering Change in the Public Sector, pp. 200-213. London: UCL Press.
57. Kim, Y. (2011). 'The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: productivity changes in university technology transfer', Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9217-8.
58. King, A. (2000). 'Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: a 'practical' critique of the habitus', Sociological Theory, 18, pp. 417-433.
59. Leggon, C. (2006). 'Women in science: racial and ethnic differences and the differences they make', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 325-333.
60. McCall, L. (1992). 'Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conceptions of social order', Theory and Society, 21, pp. 837-867.
61. MacLean, D., R. MacIntosh and S. Grant (2002). 'Mode 2 management research', British Journal of Management, 13, pp. 189-207.
62. McNay, L. (1999). 'Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity', Theory, Culture and Society, 16, pp. 95-117.
63. McNay, L. (2004). 'Agency and experience: gender as a lived relation'. In L. Adkins and B. Skeggs (eds), Feminism after Bourdieu, pp. 175-190. Oxford: Blackwell.
64. Marcoulatos, I. (2003). 'John Searle and Pierre Bourdieu: divergent perspectives on intentionality and social ontology', Human Studies, 26, pp. 67-96.
65. Massey, D. (1995). 'Masculinity, dualisms and high technology', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, pp. 487-499.
66. Moi, T. (1991). 'Appropriating Bourdieu: feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu's sociology of culture', New Literary History, 22, pp. 1017-1049.
67. Moi, T. (1999). What is a Woman?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Munn, M. (2011). Introduction, the Smith Report: Unlocking potential Perspectives on Women in SET. London: The Smith Institute.
69. Murgia, A. and B. Poggio (2009). 'Challenging hegemonic masculinities: men's stories on gender culture in organizations', Organization, 16, pp. 407-423.
70. Nicholson, L. and A. Anderson (2005). 'News and nuances of the entrepreneurial myth and metaphor: linguistic games in entrepreneurial sense-making and sense-giving', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, pp. 153-172.
71. Ogbor, J. O. (2000). 'Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology - critique of entrepreneurial studies', Journal of Management Studies, 37, pp. 605-635.
72. O'Gorman, C., O. Byrne and D. Pandya (2008). 'How scientists commercialise new knowledge via entrepreneurship', Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, pp. 23-43.
73. Özbilgin, M. and A. Tatli (2005). 'Book review essay: understanding Bourdieu's contribution to organization and management studies', Academy of Management Review, 30, pp. 855-877.
74. Özbilgin, M. and A. Tatli (2011). 'Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: rise of individualism and voluntarism', Human Relations, 64, pp. 1229-1258.
75. Özbilgin, M., F. Küskü and N. Erdogmus (2005). 'Explaining influences on career "choice": the case of MBA students', International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, pp. 2000-2028.
76. Özbilgin, M., T. A. Beauregard, A. Tatli and M. P. Bell (2010). 'Work-life, diversity and intersectionality: a critical review and research agenda', International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, pp. 177-198.
77. Parkinson, C. R. and C. A. Howorth (2008). 'The language of social entrepreneurs', Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20, pp. 285-309.
78. Patel, P. C. and B. Conklin (2009). 'The balancing act: the role of transnational habitus and social networks in balancing transnational entrepreneurial activities', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, pp. 1045-1078.
79. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Politis, D. and A. Lindholm Dahlstrand (2011a). 'Gender and academic entrepreneurship - the effect of structural factors on women entrepreneurship'. Paper presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, June, Syracuse, NY.
81. Politis, D. and A. Lindholm Dahlstrand (2011b). 'Women business ventures in Swedish university incubators: gender and the commercialisation of university research'. Paper presented at the 2011 ICSB World Conference, 16-18 June, Stockholm.
82. Prowess (2007). 'Under the microscope: female entrepreneurs in SECT'. Report commissioned by the UKRC, London.
83. Renault, C. S. (2006). 'Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 227-239.
84. Rees, T. (2002). 'National policies on women and science in Europe, the Helsinki group on Women and Science'. Available at http://cordis.europa.eu/improving/women/policies.htm [accessed 30 July 2011].
85. Sabatier, M., M. Carrere and V. Mangematin (2006). 'Profiles of academic activities and careers: does gender matter? An analysis based on French life scientist CVs', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 311-324.
86. Schatzki, T. R. (1997). 'Practices and actions: a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27, pp. 283-308.
87. SET Fair (2002). The Greenfield Report on Women in Science, Engineering and Technology. London: DTI.
88. Siegel, D. S., R. Veugelers and M. Wright (2007). 'Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23, pp. 640-660.
89. Stephan, P. E. and A. El-Ganainy (2007). 'The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap', Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, pp. 475-487.
90. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 1st edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91. Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
92. Swartz, D. L. (2008). 'Bringing Bourdieu's master concepts into organizational analysis', Theory and Society, 37, pp. 45-52.
93. Tatli, A. (2011). 'A multi-layered exploration of the diversity management field: diversity discourses, practices and practitioners in the UK', British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 238-253.
94. Tatli, A. and M. Özbilgin (2009). 'Understanding diversity managers' role in organizational change: towards a conceptual framework', Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26, pp. 244-258.
95. Tatli, A. and M. Özbilgin (2011). 'An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: a Bourdieuan framing', International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 180-200.
96. Thomas, R. and Davies, A. (2002). 'Gender and new public management: reconstituting academic subjectivities', Gender, Work and Organization, 9, pp. 372-397.
97. Thursby, J. G. and M. C. Thursby (2005). 'Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty', Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, pp. 343-353.
98. UKRC (2010). Women and Men in SET: The UK Statistics Guide 2010. Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in SET.
99. Van den Brink, M., Y. Benschop and W. Jansen (2010). 'Transparency in academic recruitment: a problematic tool for gender equality', Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1459-1483.
100. Wacquant, L. (2004). 'Habitus'. In J. Beckert and M. Zafirovski (eds), International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology, pp. 315-319. London: Routledge.
101. Wacquant, L. (2006). 'Pierre Bourdieu'. In R. Stones (ed.), Key Contemporary Thinkers, pp. 261-277. London: Macmillan.
102. Webb, J., T. Schirato and G. Danaher (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. London: Sage.
103. Weininger, E. B. (2002). 'Class and causation in Bourdieu'. In J. Lehmann (ed.), Current Perspectives in Social Theory, pp. 49-114. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
104. West, C. and D. H. Zimmerman (1987). 'Doing gender', Gender and Society, 1, pp. 125-151.
105. Wilson-Kovacs, D., M. Ryan and A. Haslam (2006). 'The glass-cliff: women's career paths in the UK private IT sector', Equal Opportunities International, 25, pp. 674-687.
106. Witz, A. (2004). 'Anamnesis and amnesis in Bourdieu's work: the case for a feminist anamnesis'. In L. Adkins and B. Skeggs (eds), Feminism After Bourdieu, pp. 211-223. Oxford: Blackwell.
107. Zalevski, A. and Maruyama, T. (2010). 'SET Women's enterprise in the UK'. Available at: http://www.theukrc.org/key-facts-and-figures/set/women-s-enterprise-in-the-UK [accessed 30 July 2011].
108. Zalevski, A. and L. Swiszcowski (2009). 'Gender and attitudes to enterprise: survey of UK doctorate students in science, engineering and technology', Equal Opportunities International, 28, pp. 65-78.
109. Zhao, L. and A. Reisman (1992). 'Toward meta research on technology transfer', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39, pp. 13-21.