Attitudes toward a game-based approach to mental health

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 20-24

  Kreutzer, Christine P ^a   Bowers, Clint A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RECREATION; SELF CONCEPT; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SELF EFFICACY; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921046836     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0382     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sundin J, Fear N, Iversen A, et al. PTSD after deployment to Iraq: conflicting rates, conflicting claims. Psychological Medicine 2010; 40:367-382.
2. Cohen B, Gima K, Bertenthal D, et al. Mental health diagnoses and utilization of VA non-mental health medical services among returning Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2010; 25:18-24.
3. Andrews A. (2011) Serious games for psychological health education. In Shumaker R, ed. Virtual and mixed reality-systems and applications. New York: Springer, pp. 3-10.
4. Wood R, Bandura A. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1989; 56:407-415.
5. Trepte S, Reinecke L. The pleasures of success: game related efficacy experiences as a mediator between player performance and game enjoyment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2011; 14:555-557.
6. Dindar M, Akbulut Y. Role of self-efficacy and social appearance anxiety on gaming motivations of MMOFPS players. Computers & Education 2014; 81:26-34.
7. Fuchslocher A, Niesenhaus J, Kramer N. Serious games for health: an empirical study of the game "Balance" for teenagers with diabetes mellitus. Entertainment Computing 2011; 2:97-101.
8. Elaklouk M, Zin M, Shapii A. Game design for acquired brain injury cognitive rehabilitation: a conceptual framework. In Zaman H, Robinson P, Olivier P, Shih T, Velastin S, eds. Advances in visual informatics. New York: Springer, pp. 218-230.
9. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell E. Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming 2002; 33:441-467.
10. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13:319-340.
11. Tannenbaum S, Mathieu J, Salas E, et al. Meeting trainees' expectations: the influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1991; 76:759-769.
12. Vroom V. (1964) Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
13. Porter L, Lawler E. (1968) Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.
14. Wabba M, House R. Expectancy theory in work and motivation: some logical and methodological issues. Human Relations 1974; 27:121-147.
15. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 2000; 11:342-365.
16. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982; 37:122-147.
17. Orvis K, Horn D, Belanich J. An examination of the role individual differences play in videogame-based training. Military Psychology 2009; 21:461-481.
18. Bandura A. (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Noe R. Trainees' attributes and attitudes: neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review 1986; 11:736-749.
20. Locke E, Cartledge N, Knerr C. Studies of the relationship between satisfaction, goal-setting, and performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 1970; 5:135-158.
21. Bandura A, Schunk D. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1981; 41:586-598.
22. Peters L, O'Connor E, Eulberg J. Situational constraints: sources, consequences, and future considerations. Research in Personnel & Human Resource Management 1985; 3:79-114.
23. Mathieu J, Martineau J, Tannenbaum S. Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: implications for training effectiveness. Personnel Psychology 1993; 46:125-147.
24. Pavlas D, Bedwell W, Wooten S, et al. (2009) Investigating the attributes of serious games that contribute to learning. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 53rd Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
25. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. (1995) Generalized self-efficacy scale. In Weinnman J, Wright S, Johnston, M, eds. Measures in health psychology: a user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON, pp. 35-37.
26. Evans A. Learning for the next generation: predicting the usage of synthetic learning environments. Doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida, 2010. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu UMI Number 3415062 (accessed Nov. 1, 2013).
27. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1986; 51:1173-1182.
28. Mathieu J, Tannenbaum S, Salas E. Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal 1992; 35: 828-847.
29. Bandura A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.