Discharge disposition to skilled nursing facility after endovascular reperfusion therapy predicts a poor prognosis

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 99-103

  Belagaje, Samir R ^a,b   Sun, Chung Huan J ^a   Nogueira, Raul G ^a,b   Glenn, Brenda A ^c   Wuermser, Lisa Ann ^a   Patel, Vishal ^a,b   Frankel, Michael R ^a,b   Anderson, Aaron M ^a,b   Thomas, Tommy T ^a,b   Horn, Christopher M ^a,b   Gupta, Rishi ^c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c WellStar Health Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APACHE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION SIZE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT REHABILITATION FACILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS THROMBECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SKILLED NURSING FACILITY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; NURSING HOME; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPERFUSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REHABILITATION CENTERS; REPERFUSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84921033008     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011045     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1581-7.
2. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. CASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 h after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359: 1317-29.
3. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: A randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282: 2003-11.
4. Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S, et al. Merci Trial Investigators. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Results of the MERCI trial. Stroke 2005;36: 1432-8.
5. Khatri P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts S, et al. IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009;73: 1066-72.
6. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al. the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368: 893-903.
7. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, et al. YNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368: 904-13.
8. Rangaraju S, Owada K, Noorian A, et al. Comparison of final infarct volume in patients treated with endovascular reperfusion therapy compared to intravenous thrombolysis in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. Arch Neurol 2013;70: 831-6.
9. Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA 1997;277: 396-404.
10. Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M, et al. Functional outcomes of posthospital care for stroke and hip fracture patients under medicare. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46: 1525-33.
11. Deutsch A, Granger CV, Heinemann AW, et al. Poststroke rehabilitation: Outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs. Stroke 2006;37: 1477-82.
12. Flint AC, Cullen SP, Faigeles BS, et al. Predicting long-term outcome after endovascular stroke treatment: The totaled health risks in vascular events score. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31: 1192-6.
13. Hallevi H, Barreto AD, Liebeskind DS, et al. Identifying patients at high risk for poor outcome after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009;40: 1780-5.
14. Sarraj A, Barreto A, Albright K, et al. Optimizing prediction scores for poor outcome after intra-arterial therapy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43: A205. Abstract.
15. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13: 818-29.
16. Horn CM, Sun CH, Nogueira RG, et al. Endovascular reperfusion and cooling in cerebral acute ischemia (ReCCLAIM I). J Neurointerv 2014;6: 91-5.
17. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al. Trial design and reporting standards for intraarterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34: E109-37.
18. Berger C, Fiorella M, Steiner T, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: Asymptomatic or symptomatic? Stroke 2001;32: 1330-5.
19. Barber PA, Demchuk A, Zhang J, et al. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355: 1670-4.
20. Adams HP, Davis PH, Leira EC, et al.Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke. A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53: 126-31.
21. Machumpurath B, Davis SM, Yan B. Rapid neurological recovery after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in stroke: Prognostic factors and outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;31: 278-83.
22. Donelan-McCall N. Small patient population and low frequency event effects on the stability of SNF quality measures: A study. MedPAC 2006;06-5.
23. Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurol 2006;5: 181-8.
24. Putman C. Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: A European multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78: 593-9.