Long sperm fertilize more eggs in a bird

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 282, Issue 1799, 2015, Pages

  Bennison, Clair ^a   Hemmings, Nicola ^a   Slate, Jon ^a   Birkhead, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fertilization success; Sperm competition; Sperm length; Swimming velocity

Indexed keywords

BIRD; EGG PRODUCTION; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SPERM COMPETITION; SWIMMING BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FINCH; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ANIMALS; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FINCHES; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

AVES; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

EID: 84920982681     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1897     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Birkhead TR, M0ller A. 1998 Sperm competition and sexual selection. London, UK: Academic Press.
2. Parker GA. 1984 Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (ed. RL Smith), pp. 1-60. London, UK: Academic Press.
3. Hunter FM, Birkhead TR. 2002 Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr. Biol. 12, 121-123. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00647-9)
4. Calhim S, Immler S, Birkhead TR. 2007 Postcopulatory sexual selection is associated with reduced variation in sperm morphology. PLoS ONE e3413. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000413)
5. Immler S, Calhim S, Birkhead TR. 2008 Increased postcopulatory sexual selection reduces the intramale variation in sperm design. Evolution 62,1538-1543. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00393.x)
6. Kleven O, Laskemoen T, Fossoy F, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld JT. 2008 Intraspecific variation in sperm length is negatively related to sperm competition in passerine birds. Evolution 62, 494-499. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00287.x)
7. Fitzpatrick JL, Baer B. 2011 Polyandry reduces sperm length variation in social insects. Evolution 65, 3006-3012. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01343.x)
8. Gage MJG. 1994 Associations between body size, mating pattern, testes size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 247-254. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0169)
9. Morrow EH, Gage MJG. 2000 The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 307-313. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1001)
10. Immler S, Birkhead TR. 2007 Sperm competition and sperm midpiece size: no consistent pattern in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 561-568. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3752)
11. Kleven O, Fossoy F, Laskemoen T, Robertson RJ, Rudolfsen G, Lifjeld JT. 2009 Comparative evidence for the evolution of sperm swimming speed by sperm competition and female sperm storage duration in passerine birds. Evolution 63, 2466-2473. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00725.x)
12. Liipold S, Linz GM, Birkhead TR. 2009 Sperm design and variation in the New World blackbirds (Icteridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 899-909. (doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0733-6)
13. Stockley P, Gage MJG, Parker GA, M0ller AP. 1997 Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149, 933-954. (doi:10.1086/286031)
14. Fitzpatrick JL, Montgomerie R, Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Kolm N, Balshine S. 2009 Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1128-1132. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0809990106)
15. Luipold S, Calhim S, Immler S, Birkhead TR. 2009 Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1175-1181. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1645)
16. Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dziuk PJ. 1974 Effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J. Reprod. Fertil. 39, 251-258. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0390251)
17. Parker GA. 1982 Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of the two sexes. J. Theor. Biol. 96, 281-294. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90225-9)
18. Boschetto C, Gasparini C, Pilastro A. 2011 Sperm number and velocity affect sperm competition success in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 813-821. (doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1085-y)
19. Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA. 2004 Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr. Biol. 14, 44-47. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.028)
20. Jamieson BGM. 2007 Avian spermatozoa: structure and phylogeny. In Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds, vol. 6A (ed. BGM Jamieson), pp. 349-511. Enfield, UK: Science Publishers.
21. Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR. 2009 Sperm morphological diversity. In Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective (eds TR Birkhead, DJ Hosken, S Pitnick), pp. 69-149. London, UK: Academic (Press).
22. Radwan J. 1996 Intraspecific variation in sperm competition success in the bulb mite: a role for sperm size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 855-859. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0126)
23. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW. 2007 Shorter sperm confer higher competitive fertilization success. Evolution 61, 816-824. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00084.x)
24. Immler S, Pitnick S, Parker GA, Durrant KL, Luepold S, Calhim S, Birkhead TR. 2011 Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5325-5330. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1009059108)
25. Cardullo RA, Baltz JM. 1991 Metabolic regulation in mammalian sperm-mitochondrial volume determines sperm length and flagellar beat frequency. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 19, 180-188. (doi:10.1002/cm.970190306)
26. Anderson MJ, Dixson AF. 2002 Sperm competition—motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature 416, 496. (doi:10.1038/416496a)
27. Vladic TV, Afzelius BA, Bronnikov GE. 2002 Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biol. Reprod. 66, 98-105. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod66.1.98)
28. Rowe M, Laskemoen T, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT. 2013 Evolution of sperm structure and energetics in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 2012-2616. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2616)
29. Burness G, Casselman SJ, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Moyes CD, Montgomerie R. 2004 Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 65-70. (doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0752-7)
30. Tourmente M, Rowe M, Mar Gonzalez-Barroso M, Rial E, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS. 2013 Postcopulatory sexual selection increases ATP content in rodent spermatozoa. Evolution 67, 1838-1846. (doi:10.1111/evo.12079)
31. Fitzpatrick JL, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Evans JP. 2010 Linking sperm length and velocity: the importance of intramale variation. Biol. Lett. 6, 797-799. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0231)
32. Gage MJG, MacFarlane C, Yeates S, Shackleton R, Parker GA. 2002 Relationships between sperm morphometry and sperm motility in the Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 61,1528-1539. (doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002.2171)
33. Humphries S, Evans JP, Simmons LW. 2008 Sperm competition: linking form to function. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 11. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-319)
34. Birkhead TR, Martinez JG, Burke T, Froman DP. 1999 Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1759-1764. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0843)
35. Froman D., Feltmann AJ, Rhoads ML, Kirby JD. 1999 Sperm mobility: a primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 61, 400-405. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod61.2.400)
36. LaMunyon CW, Ward S. 1998 Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1997-2002. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0531)
37. Laskemoen T, Kleven O, Foss0y F, Robertson RJ, Rudolfsen G, Lifjeld JT. 2010 Sperm quantity and quality effects on fertilization success in a highly promiscuous passerine, the tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 1473-1483. (doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0962-8)
38. Calhim S, Double MC, Margraf N, Birkhead TR, Cockburn A. 2011 Maintenance of sperm variation in a highly promiscuous wild bird. PLoS ONE 6, e28809. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028809)
39. Birkhead TR, Pellatt EJ, Brekke P, Yeates R, Castillo- Juarez H. 2005 Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Nature 434, 383-387. (doi:10.1038/nature03374)
40. Birkhead TR, Burke T, Zann R, Hunter FM, Krupa AP. 1990 Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 315-324. (doi:10.1007/BF00164002)
41. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F. 1995 Male phenotype and ejaculate quality in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 329-334. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0213)
42. Mossman J, Slate J, Humphries S, Birkhead TR. 2009 Sperm morphology and velocity are genetically co-determined in the zebra finch. Evolution 63, 2730-2737. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00753.x)
43. Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM. 1988 Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in the zebra finch. Nature 334, 60-62. (doi:10.1038/334060a0)
44. Bobr LW, Ogasawara FX, Lorenz FW. 1964 Distribution of spermatozoa in oviduct and fertility in domestic birds. 1. Residence sites of spermatozoa in fowl oviducts. J. Reprod. Fertil. 8, 39-47. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0080039)
45. Birkhead TR, Hunter FM. 1990 Number of sperm storage tubules in the zebra finch (Poephila guttata) and bengalese finch (Lonchura striata). Auk 107, 193-197.
46. Briskie JV, Montgomerie R. 1993 Patterns of sperm storage in relation to sperm competition in passerine birds. Condor 95, 442-454. (doi:10.2307/1369366)
47. Wishart GJ. 1987 Regulation of the length of the fertile period in the domestic fowl by numbers of oviducal spermatozoa, as reflected by those trapped in laid eggs. J. Reprod. Fertil. 80, 493 - 498. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0800493)
48. Lessells CM, Birkhead TR. 1990 Mechanisms of sperm competition in birds: mathematical models. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 325-337. (doi:10.1007/BF00164003)
49. Birkhead TR, Pellatt EJ, Fletcher F. 1993 Selection and utilization of spermatozoa in the reproductive tract of the female zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. J. Reprod. Fertil. 99, 593-600. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0. 0990593)
50. Colegrave N, Birkhead TR, Lessells CM. 1995 Sperm precedence in the zebra finch does not require any special mechanisms of sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259, 223-228. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 1995.0033)
51. Birkhead TR, Wishart GJ, Biggins JD. 1995 Sperm precedence in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261, 285-292. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0149)
52. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F. 1998 Sperm transport in the reproductive tract of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Reprod. Fertil. 114, 141-145. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1140141)
53. Immler S, Birkhead TR. 2005 A non-invasive method for obtaining spermatozoa from birds. Ibis 147, 827-830. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00456.x)
54. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012 NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671-675. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089)
55. Birkhead TR, Hunter FM, Pellatt JE. 1989 Sperm competition in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim. Behav. 38, 935-950. (doi:10.1016/S0003- 3472(89)80135-6)
56. Birkhead TR, Hall J, Schut E, Hemmings N. 2008 Unhatched eggs: methods for discriminating between infertility and early embryo mortality. Ibis 150, 508-517. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008. 00813.x)
57. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F. 1994 Numbers of spermatozoa attached to and penetrating the perivitelline layers of Japanese quail eggs. Auk 111, 997-1000. (doi:10.2307/4088834)
58. Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T. 1998 Multilocus and single-locus DNA fingerprinting. In Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach (ed. AR Hoelzel), pp. 287-336, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: IRL Press.
59. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007 Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. Notes 16, 1099. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03089.x)
60. R Development Core Team. 2012 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. See http://www.R-project.org/.
61. Bates DM, Maechler M, Bolker BM. 2012 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
62. Birkhead TR, Biggins JD. 1998 Sperm competition mechanisms in birds: models and data. Behav. Ecol. 9, 253-260. (doi:10.1093/beheco/9.3.253)
63. Pizzari T, Worley K, Burke T, Froman DP. 2008 Sperm competition dynamics: ejaculate fertilising efficiency changes differentially with time. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 332. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-332)
64. Froman D., McLean DJ. 1996 Objective measurement of sperm motility based upon sperm penetration of Accudenz®. Poult. Sci. 75, 776-784. (doi:10.3382/ps.0750776)
65. Froman D. 2003 Deduction of a model for sperm storage in the oviduct of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 69, 248-253. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.013482)
66. Allen TE, Grigg GW. 1957 Sperm transport in the fowl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 788-799. (doi:10.1071/AR9570788)
67. Rosengrave P, Gemmell NJ, Metcalf V, McBride K, Montgomerie R. 2008 A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1179-1185. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arn089)
68. Otronen M, Reguera P, Ward PI. 1997 Sperm storage in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria: identifying the sperm of competing males in separate female spermathecae. Ethology 103, 844-854. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00125.x)
69. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T. 1999 Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283, 217-220. (doi:10.1126/science.283. 5399.217)
70. Miller GT, Pitnick S. 2002 Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298, 1230-1233. (doi:10.1126/science.1076968)
71. Birkhead TR, Chaline N, Biggins JD, Burke T, Pizzari T. 2004 Nontransitivity of paternity in a bird. Evolution 58, 416-420. (doi:10.1554/03-488)