Dynamic single-cell analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under process perturbation: Comparison of different methods for monitoring the intensity of population heterogeneity

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 314-323

  Delvigne, Frank ^a   Baert, Jonathan ^a   Gofflot, Sébastien ^a,b   Lejeune, Annick ^a   Telek, Samuel ^a   Johanson, Ted ^c   Lantz, Anna Eliasson ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b WALLOON AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Green fluorescent protein; Microbial stress; On line flow cytometry; Phenotypic heterogeneity; Scale down

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CLONE CELLS; CYTOLOGY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

FLUORESCENT REPORTER; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; INTER QUARTILE RANGES; MICROBIAL POPULATIONS; PHENOTYPIC HETEROGENEITY; POPULATION HETEROGENEITY; SCALE DOWN; SEGREGATION MECHANISM;

YEAST;

GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; PROPIDIUM IODIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL VIABILITY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84920914657     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4430     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Joux F and Lebaron P, Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level. Microbes Infect 2:1523-1535 (2000).
2. Hammes F, Berney M and Egli T, Cultivation-independent assessment of bacterial viability. Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol 124:123-150 (2011).
3. Diaz M, Herrero M, Garcia LA and Quiros C, Application of flow cytometry to industrial microbial bioprocesses. Biochem Eng J 48:385-407 (2010).
4. Patkar A, Vijayasankaran N, Urry DW and Srienc F, Flow cytometry as a useful tool for process development: rapid evaluation of expression systems. J Biotechnol 93:217-229 (2002).
5. Abu-Absi NR, Zamamiri A, Kacmar J, Balogh SJ and Srienc F, Automated flow cytometry for acquisition of time-dependent population data. Cytometry Part A 51A:87-96 (2003).
6. Van Nevel S, Koetzsch S, Weilenmann HU Boon N and Hammes F, Routine bacterial analysis with automated flow cytometry. J Microb Meth 94:73-76 (2013).
7. Arnoldini M, Heck T, Blanco-Fernández A and Hammes F, Monitoring of dynamic microbiological processes using real-time flow cytometry. Plos One 8:e80117 (2013).
8. Brognaux A, Han S, Sørensen SJ, Lebeau F, Thonart P and Delvigne F, A low-cost, multiplexable, automated flow cytometry procedure for the characterization of microbial stress dynamics in bioreactors. Microb Cell Factories 12:100 (2013).
9. Shi L, Günther S, Hübschmann T, Wick LY, Harms H and Müller S, Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. Cytometry Part A 71:592-598 (2007).
10. Davey HM and Hexley P, Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide. Environ Microbiol 13:163-171 (2011).
11. Delvigne F, Brognaux A, Francis F, Twizere JC, Gorret N, Sorensen SJ and Thonart P, Green fluorescent protein (GFP) leakage from microbial biosensors provides useful information for the estimation of the scale-down effect. Biotechnol J 6:968-978 (2011).
12. Brognaux A, Neubauer P, Twizere JC, Francis F, Gorret N, Thonart P and Delvigne F, Direct and indirect use of GFP whole cell biosensors for the assessment of bioprocess performances: design of milliliter scale-down bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog 29:48-59 (2012).
13. Delobel P, Pradal M, Blondin B and Tesniere C, A 'fragile cell' sub-population revealed during cytometric assessment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae viability in lipid-limited alcoholic fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol 55:338-344 (2012).
14. Davey HM, Life, death, and in-between: meanings and methods in microbiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5571-5576 (2011).
15. Carlquist M, Fernandes RL, Helmark S, Heins AL, Lundin L, Sørensen SJ. Gernaey KV and Lantz AE, Physiological heterogeneities in microbial populations and implications for physical stress tolerance. Microb Cell Factories 11:94 (2012).
16. Lencastre Fernandes RM, Nierychlo L, Lundin AE, Pedersen PE, PuentesTellez A, Dutta M, Carlquist A, Bolic D, Schäpper AC, Brunetti S, Helmark A-L, Heins AD, Jensen I, Nopens K, Rottwitt N, Szita JD, van Elsas PH, Nielsen J, Martinussen SJ, Sørensen AE, Lantz KV, Gernaey, Experimental methods and modeling techniques for description of cell population heterogeneity. Biotechnol Adv 29:575-599 (2011).
17. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA and Van Dijken JP, Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501-517 (1992).
18. BD Biosciences, Guidelines for journal authors using the BD Accuri C6, pp. http://static.bdbiosciences.com/documents/accuri/BD_Accuri_Journal_Guidelines_TechBulletin.pdf (2013).
19. Brognaux A, Han S, Sorensen SJ, Lebeau F, Thonart P and Delvigne F, A low-cost, multiplexable, automated flow cytometry procedure for the characterization of microbial stress dynamics in bioreactors. Microb Cell Factories 12:1475-2859 (2013).
20. Neubauer P and Junne S, Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:114-121 (2010).
21. Lara AR, Galindo E, Ramirez OT and Palomare, LA, Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors - understanding the effects of environmental gradients on cells. Mol Biotechnol 34:355-381 (2006).
22. Delvigne F, Lejeune A, Destain J and Thonart P, Modelling of the substrate heterogeneities experienced by a limited microbial population in scale-down and in large-scale bioreactors. Chem Eng J 120:157-167 (2006).
23. Takors R, Scale-up of microbial processes: impacts, tools and open questions. J Biotechnol 160:3-9 (2012).
24. Delvigne F, Lejeune A, Destain J and Thonart P, Stochastic models to study the impact of mixing on a fed-batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Prog 22:259-269 (2006).
25. Sumner E and Avery SV, Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 148:345-351 (2002).
26. Zakrzewska A, van Eikenhorst G, Burggraaff JE, Vis DJ, Hoefsloot H, Delneri D, Oliver SG, Brul S and Smits GJ, Genome-wide analysis of yeast stress survival and tolerance acquisition to analyze the central trade-off between growth rate and cellular robustness. Mol Biol Cell 22:4435-4446 (2011).
27. Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D andTeusink B, Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Mol Syst Biol 5:1-10 (2009).
28. Hewitt CJ and Nienow AW, The scale-up of microbial batch and fed-batch fermentation processes. Adv Appl Microbiol 62:105-135 (2007).
29. Reijenga KA, Bakker BM, van der Weijden CC and Westerhoff HV, Training of yeast cell dynamics. FEBS J 272:1616-1624 (2005).
30. Porro D, Vai M, Vanoni M, Alberghina L and Hatzis C, Analysis and modeling of growing budding yeast populations at the single cell level. Cytometry Part A 75:114-120 (2009).
31. Broger T, Odermatt RP, Huber P and, Sonnleitner B, Real-time on-line flow cytometry for bioprocess monitoring. J Biotechnol 154:240-247 (2011).