Bacterial phylogenetic reconstruction from whole genomes is robust to recombination but demographic inference is not

mBio

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Hedge, Jessica ^a   Wilson, Daniel J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; BACTERIUM; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BACTERIA; GENOME, BACTERIAL; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84920913762     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02158-14     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Didelot X, Bowden R, Wilson DJ, Peto TEA, Crook DW. 2012. Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:601–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3226.
2. Smith JM, Smith NH, O’Rourke M, Spratt BG. 1993. How clonal are bacteria? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90:4384–4388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384.
3. Schierup MH, Hein J. 2000. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 156:879–891.
4. Anisimova M, Nielsen R, Yang Z. 2003. Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites. Genetics 164:1229–1236.
5. Shriner D, Nickle DC, Jensen MA, Mullins JI. 2003. Potential impact of recombination on sitewise approaches for detecting positive natural selection. Genet. Res. 81:115–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672303006128.
6. Posada D, Crandall KA. 2002. The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J. Mol. Evol. 54:396–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-001-0034-9.
7. Rannala B, Yang Z. 2008. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9:217–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164407.
8. Wilson DJ. 2012. Insights from genomics into bacterial pathogen populations. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002874.
9. McVean GAT, Cardin NJ. 2005. Approximating the coalescent with recombination. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360:1387–1393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1673.
10. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:254–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030.
11. Bloomquist EW, Suchard MA. 2010. Unifying vertical and nonvertical evolution: a stochastic ARG-based framework. Syst. Biol. 59:27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp076.
12. Didelot X, Lawson D, Darling A, Falush D. 2010. Inference of homologous recombination in bacteria using whole-genome sequences. Genetics 186:1435–1449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.120121.
13. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J. 2000. Maximum likelihood estimation of recombination rates from population data. Genetics 156: 1393–1401.
14. Fearnhead P, Donnelly P. 2001. Estimating recombination rates from population genetic data. Genetics 159:1299–1318.
15. Milkman R, Bridges MM. 1990. Molecular evolution of the Escherichia coli chromosome. III. Clonal frames. Genetics 126:-505–527.
16. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56:17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150601146041.
17. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425.
18. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. A series of books in biology. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco, CA.
19. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01734359.
20. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214.
21. Slatkin M, Hudson RR. 1991. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 129:555–562.
22. Morelli G, Song Y, Mazzoni CJ, Eppinger M, Roumagnac P, Wagner DM, Feldkamp M, Kusecek B, Vogler AJ, Li Y, Cui Y, Thomson NR, Jombart T, Leblois R, Lichtner P, Rahalison L, Petersen JM, Balloux F, Keim P, Wirth T, Ravel J, Yang R, Carniel E, Achtman M. 2010. Yersinia pestis genome sequencing identifies patterns of global phylogenetic diversity. Nat. Genet. 42:1140–1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.705.
23. Dress AWM, Flamm C, Fritzsch G, Grünewald S, Kruspe M, Prohaska SJ, Stadler PF. 2008. Noisy: identification of problematic columns in multiple sequence alignments. Algor. Mol. Biol. 3:7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-3-7.
24. Hornstra HM, Priestley RA, Georgia SM, Kachur S, Birdsell DN, Hilsabeck R, Gates LT, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA, Kersh GJ, Keim P, Massung RF, Pearson T. 2011. Rapid typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS One 6:e26201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026201.
25. Maynard Smith J, Smith NH. 1998. Detecting recombination from gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:590–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025960.