The impact of different aetiologies on the cognitive performance of frontal patients

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 68, Issue , 2015, Pages 21-30

  Cipolotti, Lisa ^a,b   Healy, Colm ^a   Chan, Edgar ^a   Bolsover, Fay ^a   Lecce, Francesca ^a,c   White, Mark ^a   Spanò, Barbara ^d   Shallice, Tim ^c,e   Bozzali, Marco ^d  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^e SISSA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aetiology; Cognitive performance; Executive functions; Frontal lesions; Stroke; Tumour

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BRAIN ATROPHY; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN TUMOR; CANCER SURGERY; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENINGIOMA; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; WHITE MATTER; ADULT; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MENINGIOMA; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84920895611     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert M.S., Kaplan E. Organic implications of neuropsychological deficits in the elderly. New Directions in Memory and Aging 1980, 403-432.
2. Anderson S.W., Damasio H., Tranel D. Neuropsychological impairments associated with lesions caused by tumour or stroke. Arch. Neurol. 1990, 47(4):397-405.
3. Ardila A., Rosselli M. Neuropsychological characteristics of normal aging. Dev. Neuropsychol. 1989, 5(4):307-320.
4. Behin A., Hoang-Xuan K., Carpentier A.F., Delattre J.Y. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet 2003, 361(9354):323-331.
5. Benton A.L. Differential behavioural effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 1968, 6(1):53-60.
6. Brambati S.M., Myers D., Wilson A., Rankin K.P., Allison S.C., Rosen H.J., Gorno-Tempini M.L. The anatomy of category-specific object naming in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2006, 18(10):1644-1653.
7. Campanella F., D'Agostini S., Skrap M., Shallice T. Naming manipulable objects: anatomy of a category specific effect in left temporal tumours. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(6):1583-1597.
8. Daigneault S., Braün C.M., Whitaker H.A. An empirical test of two opposing theoretical models of prefrontal function. Brain Cogn. 1992, 19(1):48-71.
9. de Leeuw F.E., de Groot J.C., Achten E., Oudkerk M., Ramos L.M., Heijboer R., Hofman A., Jolles J., van Gijn J., Breteler M.M. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001, 70(1):9-14.
10. Demakis G.J. Frontal lobe damage and tests of executive processing: a meta-analysis of the category test, stroop test, and trail-making test. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2004, 26(3):441-450.
11. Dempster F.N. The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Dev. Rev. 1992, 12(1):45-75.
12. Duffau H. Re: clinical neuroanatomy: [discussion forum]. Cortex 2011, 47(8):1016-1017.
13. Duvernoy H.M., Cabanis E.A., Bourgouin P. The Human Brain: Surface, Three-dimensional Sectional Anatomy and MRI 1991, Springer Verlag, Wien.
14. * Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39(2):175-191.
15. Fazekas F., Chawluk J.B., Alavi A., Hurtig H.I., Zimmerman R.A. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987, 149(2):351-356.
16. Hahn C.A., Dunn R.H., Logue P.E., King J.H., Edwards C.L., Halperin E.C. Prospective study of neuropsychological testing and quality-of-life assessment of adults with primary malignant brain tumours. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003, 55(4):992-999.
17. Hom J., Reitan R.M. Neuropsychological correlates of rapidly vs. slowly growing intrinsic cerebral neoplasms. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1984, 6(3):309-324.
18. Jääskeläinen J., Servo A., Haltia M., Wahlström T., Valtonen S. Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: radiology, surgery, radiotherapy, and outcome in 21 patients. Surg. Neurol. 1985, 23(3):227-236.
19. Karnath H.O., Steinbach J.P. Do brain tumours allow valid conclusions on the localisation of human brain functions? - Objections. Cortex 2011, 47(8):1004-1006.
20. Kim C.K., Lee S.H., Kim B.J., Ryu W.S., Yoon B.W. Age-independent association of pulse pressure with cerebral white matter lesions in asymptomatic elderly individuals. J. Hypertens. 2011, 29(2):325-329.
21. Kleihues, P., Burger, P.C., Aldape, K., Brat, D.J., Biernat, W., Bigner, D.D., Cevenee, W.K., 2007. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.
22. Krainik A., Lehericy S., Duffau H., Capelle L., Chainay H., Cornu P., Marsault C. Postoperative speech disorder after medial frontal surgery: role of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 2003, 60(4):587-594.
23. MacPherson S.E., Bozzali M., Cipolotti L., Dolan R.J., Rees J.H., Shallice T. Effect of frontal lobe lesions on the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(13):3124-3132.
24. MacPherson S.E., Turner M.S., Bozzali M., Cipolotti L., Shallice T. Frontal subregions mediating Elevator Counting task performance. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(12):3679-3682.
25. McKenna P., Warrington E.K. Testing for nominal dysphasia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1980, 43(9):781-788.
26. Milker-Zabel, S., Debus, J., 2008. Meningioma. In M. H. Seegenschmiedt, HB. Makoski, KR. Trott and L. W. Brady (Eds.): Radiotherapy for Non-Malignant Disorders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 609-628.
27. Murphy P., Shallice T., Robinson G., MacPherson S.E., Turner M., Woollett K., Cipolotti L. Impairments in proverb interpretation following focal frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(11):2075-2086.
28. Nelson, H.E., 1982. National Adult Reading Test (NART): For the Assessment of Premorbid Intelligence in Patients with Dementia: Test Manual,NFER.
29. Perry, A., Louis, D., Scheithauer, B., Budka, H., von Deimling, A., 2007. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours.
30. Raven J.C. Advanced Progressive Matrices, Sets I and II. 1965, H.K. Lewis, London.
31. Raymont V., Greathouse A., Reding K., Lipsky R., Salazar A., Grafman J. Demographic, structural and genetic predictors of late cognitive decline after penetrating head injury. Brain 2008, 131(2):543-558.
32. Reitan, R.M. and Wolfson, D., 1985. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsycholgical Test Battery: Therapy and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychological Press; Tucson, AZ.
33. Robinson G., Shallice T., Bozzali M., Cipolotti L. The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests. Brain 2012, 135(7):2202-2214.
34. Roca M., Parr A., Thompson R., Woolgar A., Torralva T., Antoun N., Duncan J. Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Brain 2010, 133(1):234-247.
35. Scheibel R.S., Meyers C.A., Levin V.A. Cognitive dysfunction following surgery for intracerebral glioma: influence of histopathology, lesion location, and treatment. J. Neurooncol. 1996, 30(1):61-69.
36. Scheltens P., Pasquier F., Weerts J.G.E., Barkhof F., Leys D. Qualitative assessment of cerebral atrophy on MRI: inter-and intra-observer reproducibility in dementia and normal aging. Eur. Neurol. 1997, 37(2):95-99.
37. Senathi-Raja D., Ponsford J., Schönberger M. Impact of age on long-term cognitive function after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2010, 24(3):336.
38. Shallice T., Mussoni A., D'Agostino S., Skrap M. Right posterior cortical functions in a tumour patient series. Cortex 2010, 46(9):1178-1188.
39. Stuss D.T., Alexander M.P., Hamer L., Palumbo C., Dempster R., Binns M., Izukawa D. The effects of focal anterior and posterior brain lesions on verbal fluency. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 1998, 4(3):265-278.
40. Stuss D.T., Murphy K.J., Binns M.A., Alexander M.P. Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain 2003, 126(11):2363-2380.
41. Stuss D.T., Alexander M.P. Does damage to the frontal lobes produce impairment in memory?. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 14(2):84-88.
42. Talacchi A., Santini B., Savazzi S., Gerosa M. Cognitive effects of tumour and surgical treatment in glioma patients. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 103(3):541-549.
43. Trenerry M.R., Crosson B., DeBoe J., Leber W.R. Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test 1989, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
44. Turner M.S., Cipolotti L., Yousry T., Shallice T. Qualitatively different memory impairments across frontal lobe subgroups. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(7):1540-1552.
45. Upton D., Thompson P.J. Neuropsychological test performance in frontal-lobe epilepsy: the influence of aetiology, seizure type, seizure frequency and duration of disorder. Seizure 1997, 6(6):443-447.
46. Van Dellen E., Douw L., Hillebrand A., Ris-Hilgersom I.H., Schoonheim M.M., Baayen J.C., Reijneveld J.C. MEG network differences between low-and high-grade glioma related to epilepsy and cognition. PloS One 2012, 7(11):e50122.
47. Whelihan W.M., Lesher E.L. Neuropsychological changes in frontal functions with aging. Dev. Neuropsychol. 1985, 1(4):371-380.
48. Xiong Y.Y., Mok V. Age-related white matter changes. J. Aging Res. 2011, 2011:13-25.