Depth cues changes circle size judgment measured by psychophysical scaling

Open Psychology Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 45-49

  Costa, Marcelo Fernandes ^a   Nagy, Balázs Vince ^a   Magalhães, Adsson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Depth perception; Magnitude estimation; P psychophysical scaling; Size judgment; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920871092     PISSN: 18743501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1874350101407010045     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brenner E,Van Damme WJ. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Res 1999; 39: 975-86.
2. Kaufman L, Kaufman JH, Noble R, Edlund S, Bai S, King T. Perceptual distance and the constancy of size and stereoscopic depth. Spat Vis 2006; 19: 439-57.
3. Baird JC, Wagner M, Fuld K. A simple but powerful theory of the moon illusion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990; 16: 675-7.
4. Arnold DH, Birt A, Wallis TS. Perceived size and spatial coding. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 5954-8.
5. Bennett DJ, Warren W. Size scaling: retinal or environmental frame of reference? Percept Psychophys 2002; 64: 462-77.
6. Bertamini M, Yang TL, Proffitt DR. Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level. Percept Psychophys 1998; 60: 673-82.
7. Beverley KI, Regan D. Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth. Vision Res 1983; 23: 1387-99.
8. MakinoY, Yano M. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Vision Res 2006; 46: 91-105.
9. Stevens SS. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. Am J Psychol 1956; 69: 1-25.
10. Stevens SS. Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. J Exp Psychol 1959; 57: 201-9.
11. Stevens SS, Harris JR. The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. J Exp Psychol 1962; 64: 489-94.
12. Taya S, Miura K. Shrinkage in the apparent size of cylindrical objects. Perception 2007; 36: 3-16.
13. Backus BT, Banks MS. Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 1999; 28: 217-42.
14. Torro-Alves N, Ferreira AD, Bernardino LG, Fukusima SS. Effects of Perspective on the Amplification of Object Sizes that Intercept the Horizon Line. Psicologia-Reflexao e Critica 2012; 25: 182-7.
15. Farran EK, WhitakerA, Patel N. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments. Atten Percept Psychophys 2009; 71: 207-14.
16. Joseph JS, Victor JD, Optican LM. Scaling effects in the perception of higher-order spatial correlations. Vision Res 1997; 37: 3097-7.
17. Wolf Y, Algom D. Perceptual and memorial constructs in children's judgments of quantity: a law of across-representation invariance. J Exp Psychol Gen 1987; 116: 381-97.
18. Haber RN, Levin CA. The independence of size perception and distance perception. Percept Psychophys 2001; 63: 1140-52.
19. YamauchiY, Uchikawa K. Depth information affects judgment of the surface-color mode appearance. J Vis 2005; 5: 515-24.
20. Werner JS, Pinna B, Spillmann L. Illusory color & the brain:novel illusions suggest that the brain does not separate perception of color from perception of form and depth. Sci Am 2007; 296: 90-95.