Comparison of the glasgow-blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 23-30

  Yaka, Elif ^a   Yilmaz, Serkan ^a   Özgür Doʇan, Nurettin ^a   Pekdemir, Murat ^a  

^a KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AIMS65 SCORE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GLASGOW BLATCHFORD SCORE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING; AGE; BLOOD PRESSURE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UREA NITROGEN BLOOD LEVEL;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD UREA NITROGEN; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84920830676     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12554     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Meltzer AC, Burnett S, Pinchbeck C, et al. Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores to identify which emergency department patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis. J Emerg Med 2013; 44: 1083-7.
2. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC,. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316-21.
3. Masaoka T, Suzuki H, Hori S, Aikawa N, Hibi T,. Blatchford scoring system is a useful scoring system for detecting patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need endoscopic intervention. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 1404-8.
4. Lee JG, Turnipseed S, Romano PS, et al. Endoscopy-based triage significantly reduces hospitalization rates and costs of treating upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 755-61.
5. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 101-13.
6. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M,. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356: 1318-21.
7. Saeed ZA, Winchester CB, Michaletz PA, Woods KL, Graham DY,. A scoring system to predict rebleeding after endoscopic therapy of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with a comparison of heat probe and ethanol injection. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1842-9.
8. Almela P, Benages A, Peirõ S, et al. A risk score system for identification of patients with upper-GI bleeding suitable for outpatient management. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 772-81.
9. Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS,. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1215-24.
10. Stanley AJ,. Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 2739-44.
11. Schiefer M, Aquarius M, Leffers P, et al. Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 382-7.
12. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 2009; 373: 42-7.
13. Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O, et al. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 470-5.
14. Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T,. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31: 94-9.
15. Stephens JR, Hare NC, Warshow U, et al. Management of minor upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community using the Glasgow Blatchford Score. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 1340-6.
16. Flauhault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G,. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 859-62.
17. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45.
18. Pang SH, Ching JY, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Graham DY, Chan FK,. Comparing the Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in predicting the need for endoscopic therapy in patients with upper GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1134-40.
19. Chandra S, Hess EP, Agarwal D, et al. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30: 673-9.
20. Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT,. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25: 774-9.
21. Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, et al. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 551-7.
22. Nakamura S, Matsumoto T, Sugimori H, Esaki M, Kitazono T, Hashizume M,. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 369-76.
23. Chandra S,. AIMS65 score predicts short-term mortality but not the need for intervention in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 381-2.
24. Abougergi MS, Saltzman JR,. Response to "AIMS65 score predicts short-term mortality but not the need for intervention in acute upper GI bleeding". Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 382-3.
25. Barkun A, Bardou M,. Marshall JK; Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 843-57.
26. Köksal Ö, Özeren G, Özdembox drawings light down and leftr F, Armaʇan E, Aydin Ş, Ayyildiz T,. Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 448-55.
27. Masaoka T, Suzuki H,. Does the AIMS65, a new risk score for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, work in Japan? Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 331-2.