Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: Prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 369-376

  Nakamura, Shotaro ^a,b   Matsumoto, Takayuki ^b   Sugimori, Hiroshi ^c   Esaki, Motohiro ^b   Kitazono, Takanari ^b   Hashizume, Makoto ^a,c  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

AIMS65; emergency endoscopy; gastrointestinal bleeding; hemostasis; prognosis

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ALBUMIN; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; HEMOGLOBIN; HISTAMINE H2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; AIMS65 SCORE; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHILD; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY ENDOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MENTAL HEALTH; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VERY ELDERLY; ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; JAPAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTASIS, ENDOSCOPIC; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; JAPAN; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899058062     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/den.12187     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC,. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316-321.
2. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M,. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356: 1318-1321.
3. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, etal. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: Multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 2009; 373: 42-47.
4. Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS,. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74: 1215-1224.
5. Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, etal. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 551-557.
6. Masaoka T, Suzuki H, Hori S, Aikawa N, Hibi T,. Blatchford scoring system is a useful scoring system for detecting patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need endoscopic intervention. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007; 22: 1404-1408.
7. Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT,. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2007; 25: 774-779.
8. Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O, etal. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011; 34: 470-475.
9. Laursen SB, Hansen JM, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB,. The Glasgow Blatchford score is the most accurate assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 10: 1130-1135.
10. Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T,. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013; 31: 94-99.
11. Wang CH, Chen YW, Young YR, Yang CJ, Chen IC,. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013; 31: 775-778.
12. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, etal. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 78: 576-583.
13. Marek TA,. Gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 971-977.
14. Gayer C, Chino A, Lucas C, etal. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 1,112 patients admitted to an urban emergency medical center. Surgery 2009; 146: 600-606.
15. Laine L, Shah A,. Randomized trial of urgent vs. elective colonoscopy in patients hospitalized with lower GI bleeding. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2636-2641.
16. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, etal. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009; 150: 849-857.
17. Rabeneck L, Saskin R, Paszat LF,. Onset and clinical course of bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy: A population-based study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 73: 520-523.
18. Higashiyama M, Oka S, Tanaka S, etal. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasm. Dig. Endosc. 2011; 23: 290-295.
19. Kaltenbach T, Watson R, Shah J, etal. Colonoscopy with clipping is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular bleeding. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 10: 131-137.
20. Ishii N, Setoyama T, Deshpande GA, etal. Endoscopic band ligation for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: 382-387.
21. Fujishiro M, Abe N, Endo M, etal. Retrospective multicenter study concerning electrocautery forceps with soft coagulation for non-malignant gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding in Japan. Dig. Endosc. 2010; 22: S15-18.