Towards a legitimate compromise?: An exploration of integrated reporting in the Netherlands

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1157-1189

  van Bommel, Koen ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Integrated reporting; Justification; Legitimacy; Sociology of worth; Sustainability reporting; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920821300     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1309     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams, C.A. and Kuasirikun, N. (2000), “A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 53-79.
2. Aerts, W. and Cormier, D. (2009), “Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
3. Annisette, M. and Richardson, A.J. (2011), “Justification and accounting: applying sociology of worth to accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 229-249.
4. Bebbington, J. (1997), “Engagement, education and sustainability: a review essay on environmental accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 365-381.
5. Bebbington, J., Higgins, C. and Frame, B. (2009), “Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 588-625.
6. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. and Moneva-Abadıa, J.M. (2008), “Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 371-374.
7. Boltanski, L. (1990), L’amour et la Justice comme Compe´tences, Me´tailie´, Paris.
8. Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2005), The New Spirit of Capitalism, Verso, London.
9. Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. (1999), “The sociology of critical capacity”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 359-377.
10. Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. (2006), On Justification: Economies ofWorth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
11. Brown, H.S., de Jong, M. and Lessidrenska, T. (2009), “The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as a case of institutional entrepreneurship”, Environmental Politics, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 182-200.
12. Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007), Business Research Methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Cho, C.H. and Patten, D.M. (2007), “The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: a research note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 639-647.
14. Cloutier, C. and Langley, A. (2013), “The logic of institutional logics: insights from French pragmatist sociology”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 360-380.
15. Cooper, S.M. and Owen, D.L. (2007), “Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 649-667.
16. Deegan, C. (2002), “Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures –a theoretical foundation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282-311.
17. Deegan, C. (2007), “Organisational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting”, in Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O’Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 127-149.
18. Deegan, C. and Blomquist, C. (2006), “Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: an exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 343-372.
19. Deegan, C., Rankin, M. and Tobin, J. (2002), “An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: a test of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 312-343.
20. Denis, J.L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), “Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames”, Human Relations, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 179-215.
21. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 147-160.
22. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975), “Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior”, The Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 122-136.
23. Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-550.
24. Etzion, D. and Ferraro, F. (2010), “The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting”, Organization Science, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 1092-1107.
25. Gond, J.P. and Leca, B. (2012), “Theorizing change in a pluralistic institutional context: what can economies of worth and new-institutionalism learn from each other?”, presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Boston, MA.
26. Gray, R. (2006), “Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 793-819.
27. Guerreiro, M.S., Rodrigues, L.L. and Craig, R. (2012), “Voluntary adoption of international financial reporting standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal–institutional logics and strategic responses”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 482-499.
28. Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Habermas, J. (1998), “Three normative models of democracy”, in Habermas, J. (Ed.), The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 239-252.
30. Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D.W. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Hoffman, A.J. (1999), “Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 351-371.
32. Huault, I. and Rainelli-Weiss, H. (2011), “A market for weather risk? Conflicting metrics, attempts at compromise, and limits to commensuration”, Organization Studies, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 1395-1419.
33. Hubbard, G. (2009), Unsustainable Reporting, Presented at the CR Debates, London.
34. IIRC (2013), The International/IRS Framework, The International Integrated Reporting Council, London.
35. Jacobides, M.G. (2005), “Industry change through vertical disintegration: how and why markets emerged in mortgage banking”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 465-498.
36. Jagd, S. (2011), “Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 343-359.
37. Jennings, P.D. and Zandbergen, P.A. (1995), “Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 1015-1052.
38. Kaplan, S. and Murray, F. (2010), “Entrepreneurship and the construction of value in biotechnology”, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 29, pp. 107-147.
39. Kolk, A. (2004a), “A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance”, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 51-64.
40. Kolk, A. (2004b), “More than words? – an analysis of sustainability reports”, New Academy Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 59-75.
41. Kolk, A. (2005), “Environmental reporting by multinationals from the triad: convergence or divergence?”, Management International Review, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 145-166.
42. KPMG (2002), KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002, KPMG, De Meern.
43. KPMG (2011), KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2011, KPMG, Amsterdam.
44. KPMG (2013), KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013, KPMG, Amsterdam.
45. Laine, M. (2009), “Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?: a longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1029-1054.
46. Lambooy, T.E. (2010), “Corporate social responsibility: legal and semi-legal frameworks supporting CSR developments 2000-2010 and case studies”, doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden.
47. Lamont, M. and The´venot, L. (2000), Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Lander, M.W., Koene, B.A.S. and Linssen, S.N. (2013), “Committed to professionalism: organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 130-148.
49. Larrinaga-Gonz_alez, C. (2007), “Sustainability reporting: insights from neo-institutional theory”, in Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O’Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London, pp. 150-167.
50. Levy, D.L., Brown, H.S. and De Jong, M. (2010), “The contested politics of corporate governance: the case of the global reporting initiative”, Business & Society, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 88-115.
51. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
52. McInerney, P.B. (2008), “Showdown at kykuit: field-configuring events as loci for conventionalizing accounts”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1089-1116.
53. Malhotra, N. and Birks, D. (2003),Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, London.
54. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 340-363.
55. Milne, M.J. and Patten, D.M. (2002), “Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 372-405.
56. Milne, M.J., Tregidga, H. and Walton, S. (2009), “Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 1211-1257.
57. Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. (1998), “Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 265-282.
58. O’Donovan, G. (2002), “Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 344-371.
59. O’Dwyer, B. (2002), “Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: an Irish story”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 406-436.
60. O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D.L. and Unerman, J. (2011), “Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 31-52.
61. Orij, R. (2010), “Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 868-889.
62. Owen, D.L. (2008), “Chronicles of wasted time?: a personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 240-267.
63. Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A. (2006), “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 71-88.
64. Patriotta, G., Gond, J.P. and Schultz, F. (2011), “Maintaining legitimacy: controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 1804-1836.
65. Patten, D.M. (2002), “The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 763-773.
66. Peirce, C.S. (1978), “Pragmatism and abduction”, in Hartshorn, C. and Weiss, P. (Eds), Collected Papers, Vol. 5, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 180-212.
67. Power, M. (1991), “Auditing and environmental expertise: between protest and professionalisation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 30-42.
68. Power, M. (1994), The Audit Explosion, Demos, London.
69. PwC (2012), “Integrated Reporting: Dutch top 40 (AEXþ) companies are moving ahead”, available at: www.pwc.nl/nl/assets/documents/pwc-integrated-reporting-aex.pdf (accessed 11 February 2013).
70. Ramirez, C. (2013), “ ‘We are being pilloried for something, we did not even know we had done wrong!’ Quality control and orders of worth in the British audit profession”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 845-869.
71. Reinecke, J. (2010), “Beyond a subjective theory of value and towards a ‘fair price’: an organizational perspective on Fairtrade minimum price setting”, Organization, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 563-581.
72. Reinecke, J., Spicer, A. and Van Bommel, K. (2012), “Negotiating legitimacy in situations of moral Multiplexity”, presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.
73. Roberts, R.W. (1992), “Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 595-612.
74. Scherer, A. and Palazzo, G. (2007), “Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 1096-1120.
75. Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G. (2011), “The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 899-931.
76. Scott, W.R. (2008), Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
77. Smith, J., Haniffa, R. and Fairbrass, J. (2011), “A conceptual framework for investigating ‘capture’ in corporate sustainability reporting assurance”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 99 No. 3, pp. 425-439.
78. Spence, C. (2007), “Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 855-882.
79. Spicer, A. and Sewell, G. (2010), “From national service to global player: transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 913-943.
80. Stark, D. (2009), The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
81. Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
82. Suchman, M.C. (1995), “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 571-610.
83. Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005), “Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 35-67.
84. Thevenot, L., Moody, M. and Lafaye, C. (2000), “Forms of valuing nature: arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes”, in Lamont, M. and Thevenot, L. (Eds), Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 229-272.
85. Tregidga, H. and Milne, M.J. (2006), “From sustainable management to sustainable development: a longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 219-241.
86. UNEP and KPMG (2006), Carrots and Sticks for Starters, UNEP and KPMG, Paris.
87. Yin, R. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
88. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Report for the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.