Positive and negative transfer effects in groups

The Routines of Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 175-192

  Reimer, Torsten ^a   Bornstein, Anne Louise ^b   Opwis, Klaus ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920794978     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611826     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Argote, L., Devadas, R., & Melone, N. (1990). The base-rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 296-310.
2. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
3. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 84, 25-53.
4. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Hoehle, C. (2002). Explaining routinized decision making: A review of theories and models. Theory & Psychology, 12, 453-488.
5. Brand, S., Reimer, T., & Opwis, K. (2003). Effects of metacognitive thinking and knowledge acquisition in dyads on individual problem solving and transfer performance. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 251-261.
6. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
7. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
8. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
9. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
12. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
13. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
14. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
15. Laughlin, P. R., & Sweeney, J. D. (1977). Individual-to-group and group-to-individual transfer in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3,246-254.
16. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving—the effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), 95.
17. Malone, T. W., & Crowstone, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119.
18. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 834-839.
19. Nagao, D. H., Tindale, R. S., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1985). Individual andgroup biases in information processing. Paper presented at the 93rd annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
20. Reimer, T. (2001a). Kognitive Ansätze zur Vorhersage der Gruppenleistung: Distraktion, Kompensation und Akzentuierung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32(2), 107-128.
21. Reimer, T. (2001b). Attributions for poor group performance as a predictor of perspective-taking and subsequent group achievement: A process model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 31-47.
22. Reimer, T. (2002). Negativer Lerntransfer in Gruppen. Paper presented at the 43rd meeting of the German Association of Psychology, Berlin.
23. Reimer, T., & Hoffrage, U. (2003). Information aggregation in groups: The approach of simple group heuristics (SIGH). In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 982-987). Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
24. Reimer, T., & Katsikopoulos, K. (in press). The use of recognition in group decision-making. Cognitive Science.
25. Reimer, T., Neuser, A., & Schmitt, C. (1997). Unter welchen Bedingungen erhöht die Kommunikation unter den Gruppenmitgliedern die Koordinationsleistung in einer Kleingruppe? Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 3, 495-518.
26. Reimer, T., Opwis, K., & Bornstein, A.-L. (2002). Routine problem solving in groups. In W. Gray &Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 780-785). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Ross, B. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
28. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representation in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
29. Simon, H. A. (1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 268-288.
30. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31. Stasson, M. E., & Bradshaw, S. D. (1995). Explanations of individual-group performance differences. Small Group Research, 26(2), 296-308.
32. VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 526-579). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 513-539.