Kognitive Ansätze zur Vorhersage der Gruppenleistung: Distraktion, Kompensation und Akzentuierung

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 107-128

  Reimer, Torsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Group problem solving; Information processing; Memory strategies; Process losses; Tower of Hanoi

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346971821     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//0044-3514.32.2.107     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anzai, Y. & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124-140.
2. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
3. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S. & Thomas III, R. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176-1189.
4. Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical basis for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 4, 249-279.
5. Dashiell, J. F. (1935). Experimental studies of the influence of social situations on the behavior of individual human adults. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1097-1158). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
6. Diehl, M. & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
7. Dutke, S. & Reimer, T. (2000). Evaluation of two types of online help for application software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 307-315.
8. Frederiksen, J. & White, B. (1989). An approach to training based upon principled task decomposition. Acta Psychologica, 71, 89-146.
9. Gediga, G. & Schöttke, H. (1985). Zur Schätzung der automatischen, lokalen und globalen Anteile der Informationsverarbeitung beim Problemlösen. Arbeitsberichte «Psychologische Methoden», Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Osnabrück, Heft 12.
10. Genter, D. & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.) (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Gersick, C. J. G. & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
12. Hinsz, V. B. & Davis, J. H. (1984). Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization, and choice shifts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 260-268.
13. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
14. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
15. Hoppe, R. A. (1962). Memorizing by individuals and groups: A test of the pooling-of-ability model. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 64-67.
16. Hussy, W. (1993). Denken und Problemlösen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
17. Karat, J. (1982). A model of problem solving with incomplete constraint knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 538-559.
18. Kerr, N. L. & Bruun, S. E. (1982). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
19. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J. & Kramer, G. P. (1996). «When are N heads better (or worse) than one?»: Biased judgment in individuals and groups. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 105-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Klauer, K. C. (1993). Belastung und Entlastung beim Problemlösen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
21. Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. Advances in Man-Machine System Research, 5, 47-92.
22. Kotovsky, K. & Fallside, D. (1989). Representation and transfer in problem solving. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing (pp. 69-108). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R. & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
24. Latané, B., Williams, K. & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
25. Lienert, G. A. (1962). Über die Anwendung von Variablen-Transformationen in der Psychologie. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 4, 145-181.
26. Lorge, I. & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of Eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 20, 139-148.
27. Lorge, I. & Solomon, H. (1962). Group and individual behavior in free recall verbal learning. In J. H. Criswell, H. Solomon & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical models in small group process. California: Stanford University Press.
28. Malone, T. W. & Crowstone, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119.
29. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E. & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 834-839.
30. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L. & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31. Moreland, R. L. & Levine, J. M. (1992). Problem identification by groups. In S. Worchel, W. Wood & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 17-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Nemiroff, P. M. & King, D.C. (1975). Group decisionmaking performance as influenced by consensus and self-orientation. Human Relations, 28, 1-21.
33. Perlmutter, H. V. & de Montmollin, G. (1952). Group learning of nonsense syllables. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 762-769.
34. Reimer, T. (2001). Attributions for poor group performance as a predictor of perspective-taking and subsequent group achievement: A process model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 31-47.
35. Reimer, T., Neuser, A. & Schmitt, C. (1997). Unter welchen Bedingungen erhöht die Kommunikation unter den Gruppenmitgliedern die Koordinationsleistung in einer Kleingruppe? Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 3, 495-518.
36. Rouse, W. B. & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.
37. Ruiz, D. & Newell, A. (1993). Tower-noticing triggers strategy-change in the Tower of Hanoi: A Soar model. In P. S. Rosenbloom, J. E. Laird & A. Newell (Eds.), The Soar papers. Research on integrated intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 934-941). Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Ryack, B. L. (1965). A comparison of individual and group learning of nonsense syllables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 296-299.
39. Salazar, J. (1995). Understanding the synergistic effects of communication in small groups. Small Group Research, 26, 169-199.
40. Simon, H. A. (1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 268-288.
41. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42. Stasson, M. E. & Bradshaw, S. D. (1995). Explanations of individual-group performance differences. Small Group Research, 26, 296-308.
43. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
44. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M. & Abakoumkin, G. (1996). Social compensation and the Köhler effect: Toward a theoretical explanation of motivation gains in group productivity. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (Vol. 2, pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Sydow, H. (1980). Mathematische Modellierung der Strukturrepräsentation und der Strukturerzeugung in Denkprozessen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 188, 166-197.
46. Szymanski, K. & Harkins, S. (1987). Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 981-897.
47. Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J. & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 81-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B. & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289-300.
49. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theory of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Welsh, M., Cicerello, A., Cueno, K. & Brennan, M. (1995). Error and temporal patterns in Tower of Hanoi performance: Cognitive mechanisms and individual differences. Journal of General Psychology, 122 (1), 69-81.
51. Wiesner, B. & Hacker, W. (1994). Mentale Handlungsvorbereitung: Studie zu Leistungseinfluß und personalen dingungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 41 (4), 649-677.
52. Wilke, H. & van Knippenberg, A. (1996). Gruppenleistung. In H. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone & G. M. Stephenson, Sozialpsychologie. Eine Einführung (S. 455-502). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
53. Witte, E. H. (1979). Das Verhalten in Gruppensituationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
54. Witte, E. H. & Sack, P.-M. (1999). Die Entwicklung der Gruppenmoderation PROMOD zur Lösung komplexer Probleme in Projektteams. Psychologische Beiträge, 41, 113-213.
55. Wittenbaum, G. M. & Stasser, G. (1998). The reevaluation of information during group discussion. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1(1), 21-34.
56. Wittenbaum, G. M., Stasser, G. & Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 129-152.
57. Yuker, H. E. (1955). Group atmosphere and memory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 17-23.