Use of valtrac™-secured intracolonic bypass in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 93, Issue 29, 2014, Pages e224-

  Ye, Feng ^a   Chen, Dong ^a   Wang, Danyang ^a   Lin, Jianjiang ^a   Zheng, Shusen ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS DEHISCENCE; ANASTOMOSIS RING; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DERMATITIS; DEVICE SAFETY; DIGESTIVE SURGICAL DEVICE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOOP ILEOSTOMY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM ANASTOMOSIS; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STOMA; STOMA BLEEDING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VALTRAC RING; VALTRAC SECURED INTRACOLONIC BYPASS; WOUND INFECTION; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ECONOMICS; HOSPITAL COST; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84920771894     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000224     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718-1726.
2. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, et al. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2633-2640.
3. Boutros M, Hippalgaonkar N, Silva E, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better shortterm outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:679-688.
4. Balik E, Asoglu O, Saglam S, et al. Effects of surgical laparoscopic experience on the short-term postoperative outcome of rectal cancer: results of a high volume single center institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:93-99.
5. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg. 2005;241:9-13.
6. Matthienssen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:426-429.
7. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211-216.
8. Brannagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021-1026.
9. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg. 2013;257:665-671.
10. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. 2011;254:941-946.
11. Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1530-1535.
12. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1211-1215.
13. Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1047-1053.
14. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:642-649.
15. Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202:259-264.
16. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1261-1266.
17. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:902-908.
18. Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:52-60.
19. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, et al. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:207-214.
20. Tschmelitsch J, Wykypiel H, Prommegger R, et al. Colostomy vs. tube cecostomy for protection of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1385-1388.
21. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, et al. Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:951-955.
22. Ravo B, Ger R. Intracolonic bypass by an intraluminal tube: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:360-365.
23. Yoon WH, Song IS, Chang ES. Intraluminal bypass technique using a condom for protection of coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1046-1047.
24. Ye F, Wang D, Xu X, et al. Use of intracolonic bypass secured by a biodegradable anastomotic ring to protect the low rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:109-115.
25. Shiomi A, Ito M, Saito N, et al. Diverting stoma in rectal cancer surgery. A retrospective study of 329 patients from Japanese cancer centers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:79-87.
26. Yoo SB, Jeong SY, Lim SB, et al. Left-sided ileostomy at specimen extraction site in laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:22-25.
27. Chang D, Zhang Y, Dang C, et al. Prevention of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancers. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:477-481.
28. Ghitulescu GA, Morin N, Jetty P, et al. Revisiting the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe in colonic surgery? Can J Surg. 2003;46:92-98.
29. De Fina S, Franciosi C, Codecasa G, et al. The use of the biofragmentable ring (BAR-Valtrac) in colon surgery. Minerva Chir. 2000;55:133-137.
30. Wang SM, Lai IR, Liang JT, et al. Colorectal surgery using a biofragmentable anastomotic ring. J Formos Med Assoc. 1996;95:798-801.
31. Ye F, Lin JJ. Clinical application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring for intestinal anastomosis. J Zhejiang Univ Med Sci. 2006;35:668-672.
32. Morks AN, Havenga K, Ploeg RJ. Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4461-4469.
33. Ji C, Guo X, Li Z. Advantages of the experimental animal hollow organ mechanical testing system for the rat colon rupture pressure test. Int J Surg. 2013;11:1110-1113.
34. Peng J, Lu J, Xu Y, et al. Standardized pelvic drainage of anastomotic leaks following anterior resection without diversional stomas. Am J Surg. 2010;199:753-758.