Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: The Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 257, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 665-671

  Park, Jun Seok ^a   Choi, Gyu Seog ^a   Kim, Seon Hahn ^b   Kim, Hyeong Rok ^c   Kim, Nam Kyu ^d   Lee, Kang Young ^d   Kang, Sung Bum ^e   Kim, Ji Yeon ^f   Lee, Kil Yeon ^g   Kim, Byung Chun ^h   Bae, Byung Noe ⁱ   Son, Gyung Mo ^j   Lee, Sun Il ^k   Kang, Hyun ^l  

^a Kyungpook National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School   (South Korea)

^d Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^f Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^g Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^h Hallym University Medical Center   (South Korea)

ⁱ Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^j Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^k Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^l Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

more..

Author keywords

anastomotic leakage; laparoscopic surgery; rectal cancer; risk factor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; KOREA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84875227738     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b8ed9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211-216.
2. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, et al. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1224-1226.
3. Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM, et al. Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Ann Surg. 1999;230:544-552; discussion 544-552.
4. LawWI, Chu KW, Ho JW, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92-96.
5. Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: Facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today. 2009;39:183-188.
6. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021-1026.
7. Merkel S,Wang WY, Schmidt O, et al. Locoregional recurrence in patientswith anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:154-160.
8. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:255-259.
9. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopicassisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061-3068.
10. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the cost study group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655-662; discussion 654-662.
11. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477-484.
12. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1211-1215
13. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-termoutcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637-645.
14. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009;250:54-61.
15. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:982-989.
16. Poon JT, Law WL. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3038-3047.
17. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:642-649.
18. Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:694-701.
19. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: the impact of fibrin glue. Am J Surg. 2010;199:435-441.
20. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Laparoscopic resection of extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a comparative analysis with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1818-1824.
21. Kim SH, Park IJ, Joh YG, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal disease locations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:844-851.
22. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, et al. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246: 207-214.
23. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, et al. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:462-472.
24. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:52-60.
25. ItoM, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, et al. Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:703-707.
26. Kapiteijn E, Kranenbarg EK, Steup WH, et al. Totalmesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer. Prospective randomised trial with standard operative and histopathological techniques. Dutch colorectal cancer group. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:410-420.
27. Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ, et al. Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:817-825.
28. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1137-1142.
29. Machado M, Hallbook O, Goldman S, et al. Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:940-945.
30. Bailey CM, Wheeler JM, Birks M, et al. The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:331-334.
31. McArdle CS, Hole DJ. Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:610-617.
32. Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 1999;230:404-411; discussion 403-411.