Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 40, Issue , 2015, Pages 78-94

  Cho, Charles H ^a   Laine, Matias ^b   Roberts, Robin W ^c   Rodrigue, Michelle ^d  

^a ESSEC BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920767963     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abrahamson E., Baumard P. What lies behind organizational façades and how organizational façades lie: An untold story of organizational decision making. The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making 2008, 437-452. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G. Gerard, P. Hodgkinson, W.H. Starbuck (Eds.).
2. Adams C.A. The ethical, social and environmental reporting performance-portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2004, 17(5):731-757.
3. Adams C., Narayanan V. The 'standardization' of sustainability reporting. Sustainability accounting and accountability 2007, 70-85. Routledge, New York. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, B. O'Dwyer (Eds.).
4. Aras G., Crowther D. Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity?. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 87(S1):279-288.
5. Archel P., Husillos J., Larrinaga C., Spence C. Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2009, 22(8):1284-1307.
6. Archel P., Husillos J., Spence C. The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2011, 36:327-343.
7. Atlas.ti (2004). Atlas.ti 5.0 user's guide and reference. Berlin: Thomas Muhr Scientific Software Development.
8. Ballou B., Heitger D.L., Landes C.E. The future of corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Accountancy 2006, 200(6):65-74.
9. Bansal P., Hoffman A.J. The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Barnett M.L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(3):794-816.
11. Bebbington J., Larrinaga C. Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2014, 39(6):395-413.
12. Bebbington J., Larrinaga C., Moneva J.M. Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(3):337-361.
13. Bebbington J., Unerman J., O'Dwyer B. Sustainability accounting and accountability 2014, Routledge, Abingdon.
14. Boiral O. Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2013, 26(7):1036-1071.
15. Brunsson N. The organization of hypocrisy. Talk, decisions and actions in organizations 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
16. Brunsson N. Deciding for responsibility and legitimation: Alternative interpretations of organizational decision-making. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1990, 15(1/2):47-59.
17. Brunsson N. Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1993, 18(6):489-506.
18. Brunsson N. The organization of hypocrisy 2002, Abstrakt Liber Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo, Second edition with a new introduction.
19. Brunsson N. The consequences of decision-making 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Bryman A., Bell E. Business research methods 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Campbell J.L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(3):946-967.
22. Chen J.C., Roberts R.W. Towards a more integrated understanding of the organization-society relationship: Implications for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 97(4):651-665.
23. Chevron (2003a). Annual report.
24. Chevron (2003b). Corporate responsibility report. http://www.corporateregister.com.
25. Chevron (2004a). Annual report.
26. Chevron (2004b). Corporate responsibility report. http://www.corporateregister.com.
27. Chevron (2004c). Corporate responsibility strategy. Under 16.04.04. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php.
28. Chevron (2005a). Annual report.
29. Chevron (2005b). Current speeches: Statement to the joint hearing of senate energy and natural resources committee and the senate commerce, science and transportation committee. Under 18.12.05. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php.
30. Chevron (2005c). Current speeches: U.S. energy policy: A declaration of interdependence. Under 18.02.05. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php.
31. Chevron (2005d). Proxy statement.
32. Cho C.H. Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total S.A'.s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review 2009, 18(1):33-62.
33. Cho C.H., Freedman M., Patten D.M. Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2012, 25(3):486-507.
34. Cho C.H., Michelon G., Patten D.M. Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest 2012, 12:16-37.
35. Cho C.H., Roberts R.W., Patten D.M. The language of U.S. corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2010, 35(4):431-443.
36. Christensen L.T., Morsing M., Thyssen O. CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 2013, 20(3):372-393.
37. Clarkson P.M., Li Y., Richardson G.D., Vasvari F.P. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2008, 33(4-5):303-327.
38. Collison D.J. Corporate propaganda: Its implications for accounting and accountability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2003, 16(5):853-886.
39. ConocoPhillips (2003). Our commitment to sustainable development. http://www.corporateregister.com.
40. ConocoPhillips (2004a). Annual report.
41. ConocoPhillips (2004b). Sustainable development report. http://www.corporateregister.com.
42. ConocoPhillips (2005a). Annual report.
43. ConocoPhillips (2005b). Sustainable development 2005 performance metrics. Under 20.03.06. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php.
44. ConocoPhillips (2006). Alaska charter and sustainable development 2006 report. Under 20.03.06. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php.
45. Contrafatto M. The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2014, 39(6):411-432.
46. Crane A., Matten D., Spence L.J. Corporate social responsibility. Readings and cases in a global context 2008, Routledge, London.
47. Deegan C., Blomquist C. Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2006, 31(4-5):343-372.
48. Dhaliwal D.S., Radhakrishnan S., Tsang A., Yang Y.G. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 2012, 87(3):723-759.
49. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford.
50. Gray R. The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2002, 27(7):687-708.
51. Gray R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability.and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2010, 35(1):47-62.
52. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):47-71.
53. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2014). IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report.
54. Jackson T. Prosperity without growth 2009, Earthscan, London.
55. Jupe R. An analysis of disclosures in corporate environmental reports. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 2007, 27(2):8-11.
56. la Cour A., Kromann J. Euphemisms and hypocrisy in corporate philanthropy. Business Ethics: A European Review 2011, 20(3):267-279.
57. Laine M. Towards sustaining status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987-2005. European Accounting Review 2010, 19(2):247-274.
58. Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24(4):691-710.
59. Lehman G. Disclosing new worlds: A role for social and environmental accounting and auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1999, 24(3):217-241.
60. Levy D.L. Environmental management as political sustainability. Organisation and Environment 1997, 10(2):126-147.
61. Lindblom, C. K. (1993). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Presented at the critical perspectives on accounting conference, New York.
62. Lipson M. Peacekeeping: Organized hypocrisy?. European Journal of International Relations 2007, 13(1):5-36.
63. Malsch B. Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2013, 38(2):149-168.
64. Merkl-Davies D.M., Brennan N.M. Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management?. Journal of Accounting Literature 2007, 26:116-194.
65. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83(2):440-463.
66. Milne M.J., Gray R. W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 2013, 118(1):13-29.
67. Milne M., Gray R. Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. Sustainability accounting and accountability 2007, 184-207. Routledge, New York. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, B. O'Dwyer (Eds.).
68. Milne M., Tregidga H., Walton S. Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2009, 22(8):1211-1257.
69. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22:853-886.
70. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(3):265-282.
71. Nystrom P.C., Strabuck W.H. Organizational façades. Academy of Management Proceedings 1984, 1:182-185.
72. Owen D.L. Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2008, 21(2):240-267.
73. O'Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):344-371.
74. O'Dwyer B. Qualitative data analysis: Illuminating a process for transforming a 'messy' but 'attractive' 'nuisance'. The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scene view of using qualitative research methods 2004, 391-407. Elsevier, London. C. Humphrey, B. Lee (Eds.).
75. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., Hession E. User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review 2005, 14(4):759-787.
76. Parker L.D. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2005, 18(6):842-860.
77. Patten D.M. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2002, 27(8):763-773.
78. Patten D.M. White tigers, zoos and sustainability reporting: A cynical reflection. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 2012, 32(1):17-25.
79. Prasad P., Elmes M. In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies 2005, 42(4):845-867.
80. Pulver S. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: An environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment 2007, 20(1):44-83.
81. Raworth K. A safe and just space for humanity 2012, Oxfam, Oxford.
82. Rockstrom J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson A., Chapin F.S., Lambin E.F., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461(7263):472-475.
83. Rodrigue M., Magnan M., Cho C.H. Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 2013, 114(1):107-129.
84. Simons T. Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science 2002, 13(1):18-35.
85. Spar D., LaMure L. The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review 2003, 45(3):78-101.
86. Spence C. Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2007, 20(6):855-882.
87. Spence C. Social accounting's emancipatory potential. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2009, 20(2):205-227.
88. Spence C., Husillos J., Correa-Ruiz C. Cargo cult science and the death of politics: A critical review of social and environmental accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2010, 21(1):76-89.
89. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-610.
90. THOMAS. (2009). The Library of Congress. http://thomas.loc.gov.
91. Tinker T., Neimark M. The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917-1976. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1987, 12(1):71-88.
92. Tregidga H., Milne M., Kearins K. (Re)presenting 'sustainable organizations'. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2014, 39(6):477-494.
93. Unerman J., Chapman C. Editorial: Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2014, 39(6):385-394.
94. Van Bommel K. Towards a legitimate compromise? An exploration of Integrated Reporting in the Netherlands. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2014, 27(7):1157-1189.
95. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and methods 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks.