Effective connectivity during feature-based attentional capture: Evidence against the attentional reorienting hypothesis of TPJ

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3131-3141

  Diquattro, Nicholas E ^a   Sawaki, Risa ^b   Geng, Joy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Dynamic causal modeling; Effective connectivity; FMRI; TPJ

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL REORIENTING; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN LEVEL; CAUSAL MODELING; DORSAL ATTENTION NETWORK; DYNAMIC CAUSAL MODELING; EYE POSITION; EYE TRACKING; FEATURE BASED ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE; FEMALE; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; PARIETAL LOBE; PRECUNEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; TEMPORAL LOBE; TEMPOROPARIETAL JUNCTION; VENTRAL ATTENTION NETWORK; VISUAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; ORIENTATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920754586     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht172     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Andersson JL, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K. 2001. Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. NeuroImage. 13:903-919.
2. Anticevic A, Repovs G, Shulman GL, Barch DM. 2010. When less is more: TPJ and default network deactivation during encoding predicts working memory performance. NeuroImage. 49:2638-2648.
3. Astafiev SV, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. 2006. Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo-parietal junction are independent of response selection. Eur J Neurosci. 23:591-596.
4. Azizian A, Freitas AL, Watson TD, Squires NK. 2006. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biol Psychol. 71:278-288.
5. Bledowski C, Prvulovic D, Goebel R, Zanella FE, Linden D E J. 2004. Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study. NeuroImage. 22:530-540.
6. Buschman TJ, Miller EK. 2009. Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations. Neuron. 63:386-396.
7. Buschman TJ, Miller EK. 2007. Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science. 315:1860-1862.
8. Cabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Moscovitch M. 2012. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn Sci. 16:338-352.
9. Caspers S, Geyer S, Schleicher A, Mohlberg H, Amunts K, Zilles K. 2006. The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. NeuroImage. 33:430-448.
10. Chambers CD, Payne JM, Stokes MG, Mattingley JB. 2004. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention. Nat Neurosci. 7:217-218.
11. Chang C-F, Hsu T-Y, Tseng P, Liang W-K, Tzeng O J L, Hung DL, Juan C-H. 2013. Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting. Hum Brain Mapp. 34:869-877.
12. Constantinidis C, Steinmetz MA. 2001. Neuronal responses in area 7a to multiple-stimulus displays: I. Neurons encode the location of the salient stimulus. Cereb Cortex. 11:592-597.
13. Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL. 2008. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron. 58:306-324.
14. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulusdriven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:201-215.
15. Daunizeau J, David O, Stephan KE. 2011. Dynamic causal modelling: a critical review of the biophysical and statistical foundations. Neuro-Image. 58:312-322.
16. David O. 2011. fMRI connectivity, meaning and empiricism comments on: Roebroeck et al. The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage. 58:306-309.
17. David O, Guillemain I, Saillet S, Reyt S, Deransart C, Segebarth C, Depaulis A. 2008. Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biol. 6:2683-2697.
18. Decety J, Lamm C. 2007. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist. 13:580-593.
19. Di Quattro NE, Geng JJ. 2011. Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks. J Neurosci. 31:18026-18035.
20. Donchin E. 1981. Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology. 18:493-513.
21. Doricchi F, Macci E, Silvetti M, Macaluso E. 2010. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task. Cereb Cortex. 20:1574-1585.
22. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. 2002. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J Neurophysiol. 87:615-620.
23. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. 2000. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci. 3:277-283.
24. Ellison A, Schindler I, Pattison LL, Milner AD. 2004. An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain. 127:2307-2315.
25. Ferrara M, De Gennaro M F L, Bertini M. 2000. Voluntary oculomotor performance upon awakening after total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 23:801-811.
26. Folk CL, Leber AB, Egeth HE. 2002. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Percept Psychophys. 64:741-753.
27. Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC. 1992. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 18:1030-1044.
28. Friston K, Ashburner J, Frith C. 1995. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp. 189:165-189.
29. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. 2003. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage. 19:1273-1302.
30. Geng JJ, Eger E, Ruff CC, Kristjansson A, Rotshtein P, Driver J, Kristjánsson A. 2006. On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes. J Neurophysiol. 96:2601-2612.
31. Geng J, Mangun G. 2009. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience. J Cogn Neurosci. 21:1584-1601.
32. Geng JJ, Mangun GR. 2011. Right temporoparietal junction activation by a salient contextual cue facilitates target discrimination. Neuro-Image. 54:594-601.
33. Gillebert CR, Mantini D, Peeters R, Dupont P, Vandenberghe R. 2012. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of attentional selection and reorienting in parietal cortex. NeuroImage. 67:257-272.
34. Gottlieb J. 2007. From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron. 53:9-16.
35. Grefkes C, Fink GR. 2005. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J Anat. 207:3-17.
36. Gregoriou GG, Gotts SJ, Zhou H, Desimone R. 2009. High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science. 324:1207-1210.
37. Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR. 2000. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci. 3:284-291.
38. Hung J, Driver J, Walsh V. 2011. Visual selection and the human frontal eye fields: effects of frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on partial report analyzed by Bundesen's theory of visual attention. J Neurosci. 31:15904-15913.
39. Husain M, Nachev P. 2007. Space and the parietal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 11:30-36.
40. Ikkai A, Curtis CE. 2008. Cortical activity time locked to the shift and maintenance of spatial attention. Cereb Cortex. 18:1384-1394.
41. Indovina I, Macaluso E. 2007. Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention. Cereb Cortex. 17:1701-1711.
42. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. 2000. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci. 23:315-341.
43. Kincade JM, Abrams Ra, Astafiev SV, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. 2005. An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 25:4593-4604.
44. Knight RT, Scabini D. 1998. Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. J Clin Neurophysiol. 15:3-13.
45. Knight RT, Scabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth CC. 1989. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res. 502:109-116.
46. Lavie N, De Fockert J. 2005. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychon Bull Rev. 12:669-674.
47. Luck SJ. 2005. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. 1st ed. Cambridge (): MIT Press.
48. Macaluso E, Frith CD, Driver J. 2002. Supramodal effects of covert spatial orienting triggered by visual or tactile events. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:389-401.
49. Manginelli AA, Baumgartner F, Pollmann S. 2012. Dorsal and ventral working memory-related brain areas support distinct processes in contextual cueing. NeuroImage. 67:363-374.
50. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ishai A. 2004. Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. Cereb Cortex. 14:1256-1265.
51. Meister IG, Wienemann M, Buelte D, Grünewald C, Sparing R, Dambeck N, Boroojerdi B. 2006. Hemiextinction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuroscience. 142:119-123.
52. Menon V, Ford JM, Lim KO, Glover GH, Pfefferbaum A. 1997. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport. 8:3029-3037.
53. Mitchell JP. 2008. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb Cortex. 18:262-271.
54. Moore T, Armstrong KM. 2003. Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature. 421:370-373.
55. Moore T, Fallah M. 2004. Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. J Neurophysiol. 91:152-162.
56. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C, Husain M. 2003. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 126:1986-1997.
57. Murta T, Leal A, Garrido MI, Figueiredo P. 2012. Dynamic causal modelling of epileptic seizure propagation pathways: a combined EEG-fMRI study. NeuroImage. 62:1634-1642.
58. Natale E, Marzi CA, Macaluso E. 2010. Right temporal-parietal junction engagement during spatial reorienting does not depend on strategic attention control. Neuropsychologia. 48:1160-1164.
59. Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. 2005. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull. 131:510-532.
60. Noppeney U, Josephs O, Hocking J, Price CJ, Friston KJ. 2007. The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cereb Cortex. 18:598-609.
61. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
62. Orban GA, Claeys K, Nelissen K, Smans R, Sunaert S, Todd JT, Wardak C, Durand J-B, Vanduffel W. 2006. Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia. 44:2647-2667.
63. O'Shea J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V. 2004. Timing of target discrimination in human frontal eye fields. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:1060-1067.
64. Paus T. 1996. Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: a selective review. Neuropsychologia. 34:475-483.
65. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, Leff AP. 2010. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 6:e1000709.
66. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ. 2004. Comparing dynamic causal models. NeuroImage. 22:1157-1172.
67. Polich J. 2007. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 118:2128-2148.
68. Ristic J, Giesbrecht B. 2011. Electrophysiological evidence for spatiotemporal flexibility in the ventrolateral attention network. PloS One. 6:e24436.
69. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R. 2011. The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage. 58:296-302.
70. Ronconi L, Basso D, Gori S, Facoetti A. 2014. TMS on right frontal eye fields induces an inflexible focus of attention. Cereb Cortex. 24:396-402.
71. Ruff CC, Bestmann S, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Josephs O, Weiskopf N, Deichmann R, Driver J. 2008. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 18:817-827.
72. Rushworth M F S, Behrens T E J, Johansen-Berg H. 2006. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 16:1418-1430.
73. Sawaki R, Geng JJ, Luck SJ. 2012. A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. J Neurosci. 32:10725-10736.
74. Sawaki R, Katayama J. 2006. Stimulus context determines whether nontarget stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clin Neurophysiol. 117:2532-2539.
75. Schindler I, Ellison A, Milner AD. 2008. Contralateral visual search deficits following TMS. J Neuropsychol. 2:501-508.
76. Serences JT, Shomstein S, Leber AB, Golay X, Egeth HE, Yantis S. 2005. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol Sci. 16:114-122.
77. Shomstein S. 2012. Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: top-down and bottom-up attentional control. Front Integr Neurosci. 6:38.
78. Shulman GL, Astafiev SV, Franke D, Pope D L W, Snyder AZ, McAvoy MP, Corbetta M. 2009. Interaction of stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal frontoparietal and basal ganglia-cortical networks. J Neurosci. 29:4392-4407.
79. Shulman GL, Astafiev SV, McAvoy MP, D'Avossa G, Corbetta M. 2007. Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. Cereb Cortex. 17:2625-2633.
80. Shulman GL, McAvoy MP, Cowan MC, Astafiev SV, Tansy AP, D'Avossa G, Corbetta M. 2003. Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. J Neurophysiol. 90:3384-3397.
81. Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, Friston KJ. 2006. Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 59:929-939.
82. Stephan KE, Harrison LM, Penny WD, Friston KJ. 2004. Biophysical models of fMRI responses. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 14:629-635.
83. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Moran RJ, Den Ouden H E M, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ. 2010. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage. 49:3099-3109.
84. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell'Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, Murphy D G M, Catani M. 2011. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci. 14:1245-1246.
85. Thompson KG, Bichot NP, Schall JD. 1997. Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. J Neurophysiol. 77:1046-1050.
86. Thompson KG, Biscoe KL, Sato TR. 2005. Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field. J Neurosci. 25:9479-9487.
87. Tsakiris M, Costantini M, Haggard P. 2008. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body. Neuropsychologia. 46:3014-3018.
88. Uddin LQ, Supekar K, Amin H, Rykhlevskaia E, Nguyen DA, Greicius MD, Menon V. 2010. Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity. Cereb Cortex. 20:2636-2646.
89. Valdes-Sosa PA, Roebroeck A, Daunizeau J, Friston K. 2011. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. Neuro-Image. 58:339-361.
90. Vossel S, Weidner R, Driver J, Friston KJ, Fink GR. 2012. Deconstructing the architecture of dorsal and ventral attention systems with dynamic causal modeling. J Neurosci. 32:10637-10648.
91. Vossel S, Weidner R, Thiel CM, Fink GR. 2009. What is "odd" in Posner's location-cueing paradigm? Neural responses to unexpected location and feature changes compared. J Cogn Neurosci. 21:30-41.
92. Wardak C, Ben Hamed S, Olivier E, Duhamel J-R. 2012. Differential effects of parietal and frontal inactivations on reaction times distributions in a visual search task. Front Integ Neurosci. 6:39.
93. Watson TD, Azizian A, Berry S, Squires NK. 2005. Event-related potentials as an index of similarity between words and pictures. Psychophysiology. 42:361-368.
94. Yamaguchi S, Knight RT. 1991. Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. J Neurosci. 11:2039-2054.
95. Yantis S, Jonides J. 1990. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 16:121-134.
96. Zhou H, Desimone R. 2011. Feature-based attention in the frontal eye field and area V4 during visual search. Neuron. 70:1205-1217.
97. Zhou H-H, Thompson KG. 2009. Cognitively directed spatial selection in the frontal eye field in anticipation of visual stimuli to be discriminated. Vis Res. 49:1205-1215.