Dorsal and ventral working memory-related brain areas support distinct processes in contextual cueing

NeuroImage

Volumn 67, Issue , 2013, Pages 363-374

  Manginelli, Angela A ^a   Baumgartner, Florian ^a   Pollmann, Stefan ^a,b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contextual cueing; Implicit learning; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CONTEXTUAL CUEING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLICIT MEMORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPOROPARIETAL JUNCTION; VENTRAL VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY; VOLUNTEER; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871502996     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Awh E., Jonides J., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24(3):780-790.
2. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10(4):433-436.
3. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 1990, 97(4):523-547.
4. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9(8):613-625.
5. Cabeza R., Mazuz Y.S., Stokes J., Kragel J.E., Woldorff M.G., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. Overlapping parietal activity in memory and perception: evidence for the attention to memory model. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(11):3209-3217.
6. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn. Psychol. 1998, 36:28-71.
7. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(9):844-847.
8. Ciaramelli E., Grady C.L., Moscovitch M. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1828-1851.
9. Corbetta M., Akbudak E., Conturo T.E., Snyder A.Z., Ollinger J.M., Drury H.A., Linenweber M.R., Petersen S.E., Raichle M.E., Van Essen D.C., Shulman G.L. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 1998, 21(4):761-773.
10. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Ollinger J.M., McAvoy M.P., Shulman G.L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(3):292-297.
11. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Shulman G.L. Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14(3):508-523.
12. Courtney S.M., Ungerleider L.G., Keil K., Haxby J.V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 1997, 386:608-611.
13. Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:87-114.
14. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96(3):433-458.
15. Forman S.D., Cohen J.D., Fitzgerald M., Eddy W.F., Mintun M.A., Noll D.C. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI: use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 33:636-647.
16. Friedrich F.J., Egly R., Rafal R.D., Beck D. Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology 1998, 12:193-207.
17. Geringswald F., Baumgartner F., Pollmann S. Simulated loss of foveal vision eliminates visual search advantage in repeated displays. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:134.
18. Geyer T., Zhuanghua S., Müller H.J. Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36(3):515-532.
19. Giesbrecht B., Sy J.L., Guerin S.A. Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context. Vision Res. 2012, 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.006.
20. Gillebert C.R., Dyrholm M., Vangkilde S., Kyllingsbæk S., Peeters R., Vandenberghe R. Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: parietal interactions. Neuroimage 2012, 62(3):1551-1562.
21. Greene A.J., Gross W.L., Elsinger C.L., Rao S.M. Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learn. Mem. 2007, 14(8):548-553.
22. Griffin I.C., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(8):1176-1194.
23. Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:523-532.
24. Hopf J.M., Luck S.J., Girelli M., Hagner T., Mangun G.R., Scheich H., Heinze H.J. Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10(12):1233-1241.
25. Jiang Y., Leung A.W. Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2005, 12(1):100-106.
26. Johnson J.S., Woodman G.F., Braun E., Luck S.J. Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2007, 14(5):834-839.
27. Keane M.M., Gabrieli J.D., Mapstone H.C., Johnson K.A., Corkin S. Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions. Brain 1995, 118(Pt. 5):1129-1148.
28. Kriegeskorte N., Goebel R. An efficient algorithm for topologically correct segmentation of the cortical sheet in anatomical MR volumes. Neuroimage 2001, 14:329-346.
29. Kuo B.-C., Rao A., Lepsien J., Nobre A.C. Searching for targets within the spatial layout of visual short-term memory. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(25):8032-8038.
30. Lepsien J., Griffin I.C., Devlin J.T., Nobre A.C. Directing spatial attention in mental representations: interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load. Neuroimage 2005, 26(3):733-743.
31. Manginelli A.A., Pollmann S. Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search?. Psychol. Res. 2009, 73(2):212-221.
32. Manginelli A.A., Geringswald F., Pollmann S. Visual search facilitation in repeated displays depends on visuospatial working memory. Exp. Psychol. 2012, 59:47-54.
33. Manns J.R., Squire L.R. Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2001, 11(6):776-782.
34. Nelson S.M., Cohen A.L., Power J.D., Wig G.S., Miezin F.M., Wheeler M.E., Velanova K., Donaldson D.I., Phillips J.S., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex. Neuron 2010, 67:156-170.
35. Nichols T.E., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 2005, 25:653-660.
36. Olson I.R., Chun M.M., Allison T. Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. Brain 2001, 124(7):1417-1425.
37. Paller K.A., Wagner A.D. Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6(2):93-102.
38. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10(4):437-442.
39. Pessoa L., Gutierrez E., Bandettini P., Ungerleider L. Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance. Neuron 2002, 35(5):975-987.
40. Pollmann S., Manginelli A. Early implicit contextual change detection in anterior prefrontal cortex. Brain Res. 2009, 1263:87-92.
41. Preston A.R., Gabrieli J.D.E. Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(9):2192-2207.
42. Shannon B.J., Buckner R.L. Functional-anatomic correlates of memory retrieval that suggest nontraditional processing roles for multiple distinct regions within posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(45):10084-10092.
43. Shulman G.L., McAvoy M.P., Cowan M.C., Astafiev S.V., Tansy A.P., d'Avossa G., Corbetta M. Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. J Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:3384-3397.
44. Shulman G.L., Astafiev S.V., McAvoy M.P., d'Avossa G., Corbetta M. Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. Cerebral Cortex. 2007, 17:2625-2633.
45. Smyth A., Shanks D.R. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Mem. Cognit. 2008, 36:403-415.
46. Supèr H., Spekreijse H., Lamme V.A. A neural correlate of working memory in the monkey primary visual cortex. Science 2001, 293(5527):120-124.
47. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain 1988, Thieme, Stuttgart.
48. Todd J.J., Marois R. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 2004, 428(6984):751-754.
49. Treisman A.M. Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1988, 40:201-237.
50. Tseng Y.-C., Li C.-S.R. Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2004, 66(8):1363-1378.
51. Unsworth N., Engle R.W. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114:104-132.
52. Vandenberghe R., Molenberghs P., Gillebert C.R. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(6):1092-1103.
53. Vaughan J.T., Garwood M., Collins C.M., Liu W., DelaBarre L., Adriany G., Andersen P., Merkle H., Goebel R., Smith M.B., Smith M.B., Ugurbil K. 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:24-30.
54. Vickery T.J., Sussman R.S., Jiang Y.V. Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36(6):1358-1371.
55. Wager T.D., Smith E.E. Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3(4):255-274.
56. Wager T.D., Jonides J., Reading S. Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 2004, 22(4):1679-1693.
57. Wagner A.D., Shannon B.J., Kahn I., Buckner R.L. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(9):445-453.
58. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 1999, 23(4):747-764.
59. Xu Y., Chun M.M. Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 2006, 440(7080):91-95.
60. Yonelinas A.P., Hopfinger J.B., Buonocore M.H., Kroll N.E., Baynes K. Hippocampal, parahippocampal and occipital-temporal contributions to associative and item recognition memory: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2001, 12(2):359-363.
61. Yonelinas A.P., Otten L.J., Shaw K.N., Rugg M.D. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25(11):3002-3008.