Choice over Time

The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice

Volumn 9780199290420, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Manzini, Paola ^a   Mariotti, Marco ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discounting models; Experimental evidence; Hard annomalies; Hyperbolic discounting; Soft anomalies; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920751827     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. AINSLIE, G. (1975). Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulsive Control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463-96.
2. ANDERSEN, S., HARRISON, G. W., LAU, M. I., and RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (2007). Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences. Mimeo, University of Central Florida.
3. BENOIT, JEAN-PIERRE, and OK, EFE A. (2007). Delay Aversion. Theoretical Economics, Society for Economic Theory, 2/1, 71-113.
4. BENZION, U., RAPOPORTA., and YAGIL, J. (1989). Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions: An Experimental Study. Management Science, 35, 270-84.
5. CHAPMAN, G. (1996). Expectations and Preferences for Sequences of Health and Money. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 59-75.
6. COLLER, M., and WILLIAMS, M. B. (1999). Eliciting Individual Discount Rates. Experimental Economics, 2, 107-27.
7. CUBITT, R., and READ, D. (2007). Can Intertemporal Choice Experiments Elicit Time Preferences for Consumption. Experimental Economics, online at http://www. springerlink.com/content/v47u1v31w5306870/.
8. CUMMINGS, R., HARRISON, G. W., and RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (1995). Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is a Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible?. American Economic Review, 85, 260-6.
9. ELSTER, J., and LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1992). Choice over Time. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10. FISHBURN, P. J., and EDWARDS, W. (1997). Discount Neutral Utility Models for Denumerable Time Streams. Theory and Decision, 43, 139-66.
11. FISHBURN, P. J., and Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time Preference. International Economic Review, 23, 677-94.
12. FREDERICK, S., G. LOEWENSTEIN, G., and O'DONOGHUE, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preferences: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
13. GARRATT, R., WALKER, M., and WOODERS, J. (2007). Behavior in Second-Price Auctions by Highly Experienced eBay Buyers and Sellers. Mimeo, University of California, Santa Barbara.
14. GIGLIOTTI, G., and SOPHER, B. (1997). Violations of Present Value Maximization in Income Choice. Theory and Decision, 43, 45-69.
15. GUYSE, J., KELLER, L., and EPPLE, T. (2002). Valuing Environmental Outcomes: Preferences for Constant or Improving Sequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 253-77.
16. HARRISON, G. W. (1992). Theory and Misbehavior of First Price Auctions: Reply. American Economic Review, 82, 1426-43.
17. HARRISON, G. W., and Lau, M. (2005). Is the Evidence for Hyperbolic Discounting in Humans Just an Experimental Artefact?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 657.
18. HARRISON, G. W., and List, J. A. (2004). Field Experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009-55.
19. LAU, M., and WILLIAMS, M. B. (2002). Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. American Economic Review, 92, 1606-17.
20. HERTWIG, R., and ORTMANN, A. (2001). Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?. Behavioral Brain Science, 24, 383-451.
21. KAHNEMAN, D., and TVERSKY, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 363-91.
22. LAIBSON, D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443-77.
23. LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1987). Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666-84.
24. LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1988). Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice. Management Science, 34, 200-14.
25. LOEWENSTEIN, G., and Prelec, D. (1991). Decision Making over Time and under Uncertainty: A Common Approach. Management Science, 37, 770-86.
26. LOEWENSTEIN, G., and Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and Interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573-97.
27. LOEWENSTEIN, G., and Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91-108.
28. LOEWENSTEIN, G. and Sicherman, N. (1991). Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles?. Journal of Labour Economics, 9, 67-84.
29. LOEWENSTEIN, G. and Thaler, R. (1989). Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 181-93.
30. MANZINI, P., and MARIOTTI, M. (2006). A Vague Theory of Choice over Time. Advances in Theoretical Economics, 6/1, article 6.
31. MANZINI, P., and MARIOTTI, M. (2007). Sequentially Rationalizable Choice. American Economic Review, 97, 1824-39.
32. MANZINI, P., and MARIOTTI, M., and Mittone, L. (2006). Choosing Monetary Sequences: Theory and Experimental Evidence. CEEL WP 1-06 and IZA DP no. 2129.
33. MANZINI, P., and MARIOTTI, M., and Mittone, L. (2007). The Elicitation of Time Preferences. Research report for ESRC grant RES-000-22-1636, mimeo.
34. NOOR, J. (2007). Hyperbolic Discounting and the Standard Model. Mimeo, Boston University.
35. NOUSSAIR, C., ROIBIN, S., and RUFFIEUX, B. (2004). Revealing Consumers' Willingness to Pay: A Comparison of the BDM Mechanism and the Vickrey Auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 725-41.
36. OK, EFE A., and MASATLIOGLU, Y. (2003). A General Theory of Time Preferences. Mimeo, Department of Economics, New York University.
37. OK, EFE A., and MASATLIOGLU, Y. (2007). A Theory of (Relative) Discounting. Journal of Economic Theory, 137/1, 214-45.
38. ORTMANN, A., and HERTWIG, R. (2005). Monetary Incentives: Usually Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient?. CERGE-EI Working Paper no. 307.
39. PENDER, J. (1996). Discount Rates and Credit Markets: Theory and Evidence from Rural India. Journal of Development Economics, 50, 257-96.
40. PHELPS, E., and POLLACK, R. (1968). On Second Best National Savings and Game-Equilibrium Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 201-8.
41. PIGOU, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
42. PLOTT, C., and ZEILER, K. (2005). The Willingness to Pay/Willingness to Accept Gap, the Endowment Effect, Subject Misconceptions and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations. American Economic Review, 95, 530-45.
43. READ, D. (2001). Is Time-Discounting Hyperbolic or Subadditive?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 5-32.
44. READ, D. (2005). Monetary Incentives, What are they Good For?. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 265-7.
45. READ, D., and Powell, M. (2002). Reasons for Sequence Preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 433-60.
46. ROELOFSMA, P. H., and READ, D. (2000). Intransitive Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 161-77.
47. RUBINSTEIN, A. (1988). Similarity and Decision Making under Risk (Is there a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?). Journal of Economic Theory, 46, 145-53.
48. RUBINSTEIN, A. (2001). A Theorist's View of Experiments. European Economic Review, 45, 615-28.
49. RUBINSTEIN, A. (2003). Is it Economics and Psychology? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting. International Economic Review, 44, 1207-16.
50. RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (1998). Home-Grown Values and Incentive Compatible Auction Design. International Journal of Game Theory, 27, 427-41.
51. SAMUELSON, P. (1937). A Note On the Measurement of Utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155-61.
52. SAYMAN, S., AND ÖNCÜLER, A. (2006). Reverse Time Inconsistency. Mimeo, INSEAD.
53. SCHOLTEN, M., and READ, D. (2006). Discounting by Intervals: A Generalized Model of Intertemporal Choice. Management Science, 52, 1424-36.
54. SHELLEY, M. (1993). Outcome Signs, Question Frames and Discount Rates. Management Science, 39, 806-15.
55. STROTZ, R. H. (1956). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 165-80.
56. THALER, R. (1981). Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-7.
57. TVERSKY, A. (1969). Intransitivity of Preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
58. TVERSKY, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211, 453-8.
59. TVERSKY, A., and Koehler, D. (1994). Support Theory: Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability Theory. Psychological Review, 101, 547-67.
60. TVERSKY, A., Sattath, S., and Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent Weighting in Judgement and Choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-84.
61. TVERSKY, A., Slovic, P., and Kahneman, D. (1990). The Causes of Preference Reversal. American Economic Review, 80, 204-17.
62. WARNER, J. T., and PLEETER, S. (2001). The Personal Discount Rate: Evidence from Military Downsizing Programs. American Economic Review, 91, 33-53.