A theorist's view of experiments

European Economic Review

Volumn 45, Issue 4-6, 2001, Pages 615-628

  Rubinstein, Ariel ^a,b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic modeling; Economic theory; Experimental economics; Hyperbollic discounting

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORY; ECONOMICS; MODELING;

EID: 0035015702     PISSN: 00142921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00104-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ainsley, G., Haslam, N., 1992. Hyperbolic discounting. In: Loewenstein, G., Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over Time. Russell Sage Foundation.
2. Backhouse R. If mathematics is informal, then perhaps we should accept that economics must be informal too? The Economic Journal. 108:1998;1848-1858.
3. Brocas, I., Carrilo, J., 1999. Entry mistakes, entrepreneurial boldness and optimism. Mimeo.
4. Laibson, D., 1996. Hyperbolic discount functions, undersaving, and savings plans. Working paper No. 5635, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
5. Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112:1997;443-477.
6. Leland, J., 1993. Similarity judgments, violations of stationarity, and reflection effects in intertemporal choice. Mimeo.
7. Luce R.D. Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica. 24:1956;178-191.
8. Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica. 18:1950;155-162.
9. Phelps E.S., Pollak R.A. On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies. 35:1968;201-208.
10. Rubinstein A. Similarity and decision-making under risk. Journal of Economic Theory. 46:1988;145-153.
11. Rubinstein, A., 1999. Experience from a course in game theory: Pre- and post-class problem sets as a didactic device. Games and Economic Behavior 28, 155-170. (Second edition is posted in http: //www.princeton.edu/~ariel/99/ gt100.html).
12. Rubinstein A. Economics and Language. 2000;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Rubinstein, A., 2000b. Is it "Economics and Psychology"? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Mimeo.
14. Rubinstein A., Safra Z., Thomson W. On the interpretation of the Nash bargaining solution. Econometrica. 60:1992;1171-1186.
15. Thaler R. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters. 8:1981;201-207.
16. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review. 84:1977;327-352.