Four Concepts of Validity: Reflections on Inclusive and Exclusive Positivism

The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Waluchow, Wil ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Inclusive exclusive debate; Ken Himma; Law; Legal systems; Matthew Kramer; Positivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920751351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343298.003.0005     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. H.L.A. HART, THE CONCEPT OF LAW 203-04 (Penelope A. Bulloch & Joseph Raz eds., 2d ed. 1994).
2. See, e.g., W.J. WALUCHOW, INCLUSIVE LEGAL POSITIVISM (1994);
3. JULES COLEMAN, THE PRACTICE OF PRINCIPLE (2001);
4. MATTHEW KRAMER, WHERE LAW AND MORALITY MEET (2004).
5. See, e.g., JOSEPH RAZ, THE AUTHORITY OF LAW (1979);
6. Leslie Green, Legal Positivism, in THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY (Edward N. Zalta ed., Spring 2003), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2003/entries/legal-positivism/;
7. Scott Shapiro, On Hart's Way Out, 4 LEGAL THEORY 469 (1998)
8. Law, Morality and the Guidance of Conduct, 6 LEGAL THEORY 127 (2000);
9. ANDREI MARMOR, POSITIVE LAW AND OBJECTIVE VALUES (2001);
10. Michael Guidice, Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges, 15 CAN. J. L. & JURISPRUDENCE 69 (2002)
11. The Regular Practice of Morality in Law, 21 RATIO JURIS 94 (2008).
12. See JOSEPH RAZ, The Inner Logic of the Law, in ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN: ESSAYS IN THE MORALITY OF LAW AND POLITICS 242 (rev. ed. 1996).
13. This is precisely how the Canadian paramountcy doctrine operates. See PETER HOGG, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF CANADA 113-14 (2d ed. 1985).
14. See Leslie Green, Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals, 83 N.Y.U.L. REV. 1035 (2008).
15. H.L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, reprinted in ESSAYS IN JURISPRUDENCE AND PHILOSOPHY 48, 59 (1983).