From moral outrage to social protest: The role of psychological standing

The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 103-124

  Miller, Dale T ^a   Effron, Daniel A ^a   Zak, Sonya V ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920658704     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837658     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Bissenger, B. (1997). A prayer for the city. New York: Random House.
2. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.
3. Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22, 280–296.
4. Dixon, K. A., Storen, D., & Van Horn, C. E. (2002). A workplace divided: How Americans view discrimination and race on the job. New Brunswick: State University of New Jersey, Rutgers, John J. Heldrich Center for Workplace Development.
5. Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Who is entitled to advocate: The effects of moralizing an issue on psychological standing. Unpublished manuscript.
6. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
7. Goss, K. A. (2003). Disarmed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Green, D. P., & Cowden, J. A. (1992). Who protests: Self-interest and White opposition to busing? Journal of Politics, 54, 471–496.
9. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365–383.
11. Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). You can criticize because you care: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 499–518.
12. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law and Social Inquiry, 31, 801–830.
14. Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
15. Kuran, T. (1997). Private truths, public lies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper.
17. MADD’s first male president to honor area police. (2005, October 17). Oakland Tribune. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_/ai_n15804170
18. McAdams, R. H. (1997). The origin, development, and regulation of norms. Michigan Law Review, 96(2), 338–433.
19. Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 223–244). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20. Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060.
21. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553.
22. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). The power of the myth of self-interest. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 25–48). New York: Plenum.
23. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62.
24. Miller, D. T., Ratner, R. K., & Zhao, M. (2008). Vested interest and advocacy effectiveness: The benefits of psychological standing. Unpublished manuscript.
25. Miller, D. T., & Zak, S. V. (2008). Disliking those who shame us into behaving well. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Olson, J. M., & Hafer, C. L. (2001). Tolerance of personal deprivation. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 157–175). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Randall, K. C. (1988). Universal jurisdiction under international law. Texas Law Review, 66, 785–841.
28. Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5–16.
29. Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 28–45.
30. Samuelson, R. (2007, November 15–21). Under her skin. Washington City Paper, 27(46).
31. Sears, D. O., Hensler, C. P., & Speer, L. K. (1979). Whites’ oppositions to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics? American Political Science Review, 73, 369–384.
32. Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 210–221.
33. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895–917.
34. Solomon, R. C. (1990). A passion for justice: Emotions and the origins of the social contract. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35. Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Elder, T. J., & Tarrant, M. (2008). Social identity and social convention in responses to criticisms of groups. In Y. Kashima & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance and transformation of stereotypes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Sutton, R. M., Elder, T. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 563–575.
37. Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., & Lind, A. E. (1999). Two psychologies of conflict resolution: Differing antecedents of pre-experience choices and post-experience evaluations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 99–118.
38. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.mspb.gov/sites/mspb/pages/MSPB%20Studies.aspx
39. Zak, S. V., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Norms controlling reactions to norm violations. Unpublished manuscript.