The two psychologies of conflict resolution: Differing antecedents of pre-experience choices and post-experience evaluations

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 99-118

  Tyler, Tom R ^a   Huo, Yuen J ^b   Lind, E Allan ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice; Satisfaction; Self interest; The relational model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012935522     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299022001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1972). Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Brett, J. M. (1986). Commentary on procedural justice papers. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 81-90). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. (1983). Mediator-advisors: A new third-party role. In M. Bazerman & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 165-176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
5. Fischhoff, B. (1980). For those condemned to study the past. In R. A. Schwede & D. W. Fiske (Eds.), New directions for methodology of behavioral science (pp. 79-93). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Hensler, D. R., Marquis, M. S., Abrahamse, A. F., Berry, S. H., Ebener, P. A., Lewis, E. G., Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Manning, W. G., Rogowski, J. A., & Vaiana, M. E. (1991). Compensation for accidental injuries in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. New York: Routledge.
9. Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Preferences for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 13-30.
10. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H.-J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Super ordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns. Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
11. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. (1972). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 190-197.
12. Kurtz, S. T., & Houlden, P. (1981). Determinants of procedural preferences of post court-martial military personnel. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 27-43.
13. Lind, E. A. (1997). Testimony on the 'Alternative Dispute Resolution and Settlement Act' (H.R. 2603, 105th Congress, 1st Session). Testimony, House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property, 9 October.
14. Lind, E. A. (in press). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational behavior. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
15. Lind, E. A., Erickson, B. E., Friedland, N., & Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 318-242.
16. Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (1998). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Paper presented to the Academy of Management meetings, August, San Diego, CA.
17. Lind, E. A., Huo, Y. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1994). And justice for all: Ethnicity, gender, and preferences for dispute resolution procedures. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 269-290.
18. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
19. Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigant's evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law and Society Review, 24, 953-996.
20. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
21. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
22. MacCoun, R., Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1992). Alternative dispute resolution in trial and appellate courts. In D. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of law and psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). The power of the myth of self-interest. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice. New York: Plenum.
24. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53-62.
25. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The influence of the status of one's group and one's status in that group on self-esteem and group-oriented behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
27. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
29. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Tyler, T. R. (1989a). The quality of dispute resolution processes and outcomes. Denver University Law Review, 66, 419-436.
31. Tyler, T. R. (1989b). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
32. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale.
33. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
35. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., Ohbuchi, K., Sugawara, I., & Huo, Y. J. (1998). Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 137-146.
36. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.