A three-dimensional approach to pennation angle estimation for human skeletal muscle

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 1474-1484

  Lee, Dongwoon ^a   Li, Zhi ^b   Sohail, Qazi Zain ^b   Jackson, Ken ^a   Fiume, Eugene ^a   Agur, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

cadaveric specimen; digitization; line of action; pennation angle; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION; MUSCLE; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

3D ARCHITECTURES; CADAVERIC SPECIMEN; GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; LINE OF ACTION; PENNATION ANGLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ARCHITECTURES; TWO DIMENSIONAL (2 D); ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

ARCHITECTURE;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; THEORETICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84920564007     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.917294     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AgurA, MahoneyM, MarleyK, Ng-Thow-HingV, FiumeE. 2000. Reliability of modeling human skeletal muscle architecture using a 3D-X Microscribe digitizer. In: Plastic Surgery Research Council 45th Annual Meeting; 2000, May 17–28; Seattle, WA, USA.
2. AgurA, Ng-Thow-HingV, BallK, FiumeE, McKeeN. 2003. Documentation and three-dimensional modelling of human soleus muscle architecture. Clin Anat. 16(4):285–293.
3. BénardM, BecherJ, HarlaarJ, HuijingP, JaspersR. 2009. Anatomical information is needed in ultrasound imaging of muscle to avoid potentially substantial errors in measurement of muscle geometry. Muscle Nerve. 39(5):652–665.
4. DumasGA, PoulinMJ, RoyB, GagnonM, JovanovicM. 1988. A three-dimensional digitization method to measure trunk muscle lines of action. Spine. 13:532–541.
5. FroelingM, NederveenA, HeijtelD, LatasterA, BosC, NicolayK, MaasM, DrostM, StrijkersG. 2012. Diffusion-tensor MRI reveals the complex muscle architecture of the human forearm. J Magn Reson Imaging. 36:237–248.
6. GansC, de VreeF. 1987. Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol. 192:63–85.
7. KimS, BoyntonE, RavichandiranK, FungL, BleakneyR, AgurA. 2007. Three-dimensional study of the musculotendinous architecture of supraspinatus and its functional correlations. Clin Anat. 20:648–655.
8. KoolstraJ, van EijdenT, WeijsW. 1989. An iterative procedure to estimate muscle lines of action in vivo. J Biomech. 22:911–920.
9. LeeD, RavichandiranK, JacksonK, FiumeE, AgurA. 2012. Robust estimation of physiological cross-sectional area and geometric reconstruction for human skeletal muscle. J Biomech. 45(8):1507–1513.
10. LevinDI, GillesB, MadlerB, PaiDK. 2011. Extracting skeletal muscle fiber fields from noisy diffusion tensor data. Med Image Anal. 15:340–353.
11. LieberR, FridenJ. 2000. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 23:1647–1666.
12. MurrayWM, BuchananTS, DelpSL. 2000. The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. J Biomech. 33:943–952.
13. NambureteAI, RanaM, WakelingJM. 2011. Computational methods for quantifying in vivo muscle fascicle curvature from ultrasound images. J Biomech. 44:2538–2543.
14. PoelstraKA, EijkelkampMF, VeldhuizenAG. 2000. The geometry of the human paraspinal muscles with the aid of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and 3-Space Isotrak. Spine. 25:2176–2179.
15. RanaM, WakelingJ. 2011. In-vivo determination of 3D muscle architecture of human muscle using free hand ultrasound. J Biomech. 44:2129–2135.
16. RavichandiranK, RavichandiranM, OliverM, SinghK, McKeeN, AgurA. 2009. Determining physiological cross-sectional area of extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis as a whole and by regions using 3D computer muscle models created from digitized fiber bundle data. Comput Methods Prog Biomed.95:203–212.
17. RosatelliA, RavichandiranK, AgurA. 2008. Three-dimensional study of the musculotendinous architecture of lumbar multifidus and its functional implications. Clin Anat. 21:539–546.
18. SchenkP, SiebertT, HiepeP, GullmarD, ReichenbachJR, WickC, BlickhanR, BölM. 2013. Determination of three-dimensional muscle architectures: validation of the DTI-based fiber tractography method by manual digitization. J Anat. 223:61–68.
19. Van DonkelaarC, KretzersL, BovendeerdP, LatasterL, NicolayK, JanssenJ, DrostM. 1999. Diffusion tensor imaging in biomechanical studies of skeletal muscle function. J Anat. 194:79–88.
20. van SpronsenPH, ValkJ, WeijsWA, Prahl-AndersenB. 1987. Analysis of masticatory muscle orientation in adults by means of MRI. Acta Anat. 130:96–97.
21. WardS, KimC, EngC, GottschalkL, TomiyaA, GarfinS, LieberR. 2009. Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91:176–185.
22. ZajacF. 1989. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 17:359–411.