Documentation and three-dimensional modelling of human soleus muscle architecture

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 285-293

  Agur, Anne M ^a   Ng Thow Hing, Victor ^b,c   Ball, Kevin A ^b,d   Fiume, Eugene ^b   McKee, Nancy Hunt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c HONDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d NEW YORK CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Architecture; Modelling; Skeletal muscle; Soleus

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER MODEL; DISSECTION; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MEASUREMENT; MUSCLE CELL; MUSCLE FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SOLEUS MUSCLE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOCUMENTATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MUSCLE, SKELETAL;

EID: 0038311010     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.10112     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agur A, McKee N. 1997. Soleus muscle: fiber orientation. Clin Anat 10:130.
2. Agur AM. 2001. Architecture of the human soleus muscle: three-dimensional computer modelling of cadaveric muscle and ultrasonographic documentation in vivo. University of Toronto, Toronto: Institute of Medical Science. 197 p.
3. Alexander RM, Vernon A. 1975. The dimensions of knee and ankle muscles and the forces they exert. J Human Movement Studies 1:115-123.
4. Ball KA, Pierrynowski MR. 1995. Estimation of six degree of freedom rigid body segment motion from two dimensional image data. Human Movement Science 14:139-154.
5. Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Friederich JA. 1986. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomech 19:589-596.
6. Campbell KM, Biggs NL, Blanton PL, Lehr RP. 1973. Electromyographic investigation of the relative activity among four components of the triceps surae. Am J Phys Med 52:30-41.
7. Chow RS, Medri MK, Martin DC, Leekam RN, Agur AM, McKee NH. 2000. Sonographic studies of human soleus and gastrocnemius muscle architecture: gender variability. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:236-244.
8. Delp SL, Loan JP. 1995. A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. Comput Biol Med 25:21-34.
9. Enoka RM. 1988. Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Books. p 155-181.
10. Friederich JA, Brand RA. 1990. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J Biomech 23:91-95.
11. Fukunaga T, Ito M, Ichinose Y, Kuno S, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S. 1996. Tendinous movement of a human muscle during voluntary contractions determined by real-time ultrasonography. J Appl Physiol 81:1430-1433.
12. Haines RW. 1932. The laws of muscle and tendon growth. J Anat 66:578-585.
13. Herzog W, ter Keurs HEDJ. 1988. A method for the determination of the force-length relation of selected in-vivo human skeletal muscles. Pflügers Arch 411:637-641.
14. Huijing PA, van Lookeren Campagne AAH, Koper JF. 1989. Muscle architecture and fibre characteristics of rat gastrocnemius and semimembranosus muscles during isometric contractions. Acta Anat 135:46-52.
15. Huijing PA, Woittiez RD. 1984. The effect of architecture on skeletal muscle performance: A simple planimetric model. Neth J Zool 34:21-32.
16. Ichinose Y, Kanehisa H, Ito M, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. 1998. Morphological and functional differences in the elbow extensor muscle between highly trained male and female athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 78:109-114.
17. Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. 1998. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol 85:398-404.
18. Legreneur P, Morlon B, Van Hoecke J. 1996. Simulation of in situ soleus isometric force output as a function of neural excitation. J Biomech 29:1455-1462.
19. Legreneur P, Morlon B, Van Hoecke J. 1997. Joined effects of pennation angle and tendon compliance on fibre length in isometric contractions: a simulation study. Arch Physiol Biochem 105:450-455.
20. Lieber RL, Friden J. 2000. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 23:1647-1666.
21. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeant AJ. 1998. In vivo measurements of the triceps surae complex architecture in man: implications for muscle function. J Physiol (Lond) 512:603-614.
22. Martin DC, Medri MK, Chow RS, Oxorn V, Leekam RN, Agur AM, McKee NH. 2001. Comparing human skeletal muscle architectural parameters of cadavers with in vivo ultrasonographic measurements. J Anat 199:429-434.
23. Muhl ZF. 1982. Active length-tension relation and the effect of muscle pinnation on fiber lengthening. J Morphol 173:285-292.
24. Ng-Thow-Hing V. 2001. Anatomically based models for physical and geometric reconstruction of humans and other animals. Toronto: Department of Computer Science. Toronto: University of Toronto. 162 p.
25. Otten E. 1988. Concepts and models of functional architecture in skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 16:89-139.
26. Oxorn VM, Agur AM, McKee NH. 1998. Resolving discrepancies in image research: the importance of direct observation in the illustration of the human soleus muscle. J Biocommun 25:16-26.
27. Patel TJ, Lieber RL. 1997. Force transmission in skeletal muscle: from actomyosin to external tendons. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 25:321-363.
28. Pierrynowski MR. 1982. A physiological model for the solution of individual muscle forces during normal human walking. Department of Kinesiology. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University. 179 p.
29. Pierrynowski MR, Morrison JB. 1985. A physiological model for the evaluation of muscular forces in human locomotion: theoretical aspects. Math Biosci 75:69-101.
30. Press HP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. 1992. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 994 p.
31. Roy RR, Ishihara A. 1997. Overview: Functional implications of the design of skeletal muscles. Acta Anat 159:75-77.
32. Sinnatamby CS. 1999. Last's anatomy regional and applied. 10th Ed. London: Churchill Livingstone. p 141-142.
33. Spoor CW, van Leeuwen JL, van der Meulen WJTM, Huson A. 1991. Active force-length relationship of human lower-leg muscles estimated from morphological data: a comparison of geometric muscle models. Eur J Morphol 29:137-160.
34. Trzenschik K, Loetzke H-H. 1969. Strukturanalytische Untersuchungen am M. soleus des Menschen. Anat Anz Bd 124:297-313.
35. Van der Helm FCT, Veenbaas R. 1991. Modelling the mechanical effect of muscles with large attachment sites: application to the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 24:1151-1163.
36. van der Linden BJJJ, Koopman HFJM, Grootenboer HJ, Huijing PA. 1998. Modelling functional effects of muscle geometry. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8:101-109.
37. White SC, Yack HJ, Winter DA. 1984. A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model for gait analysis: anatomical variability estimates. J Biomech 22:885-893.
38. Wickiewicz TL, Edgerton VR, Roy RR, Perrine J, Powell P. 1982. Human leg muscle architecture and force-velocity properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:144.
39. Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR. 1983. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop 179:275-283.
40. Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH, editors. 1989. Gray's anatomy. 37th Ed. London: Churchill Livingstone. p 647-648.
41. Woittiez RD, Huijing PA, Boom HBK, Rozendal RH. 1984. A three-dimensional muscle model: a quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. J Morphol 182:95-113.
42. Woittiez RD, Huijing PA, Rozendal RH. 1983. Influence of muscle architecture on the length-force diagram of mammalian muscle. Pflügers Arch 399:275-279.
43. Yamaguchi GT, Sawa AGU, Moran DW, Fessler MJ, Winters JM. 1990. A survey of human musculotendon actuator parameters. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y, editors. Multiple muscle systems. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 717-747.
44. Zajac FE. 1989. Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17:359-411.