Reliability of veterinary drug residue confirmation: High resolution mass spectrometry versus tandem mass spectrometry

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 856, Issue , 2015, Pages 54-67

  Kaufmann, A ^a   Butcher, P ^a   Maden, K ^a   Walker, S ^a   Widmer, M ^a  

^a Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of Zurich   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Commission Decision 93 256 EC; Confirmation; Food safety; High resolution mass spectrometry; Residue

Indexed keywords

FOOD SAFETY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NUMBER THEORY; RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION; TRACE ANALYSIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONS; COMMISSION DECISION 93/256/EC; CONFIRMATION; FALSE POSITIVE AND FALSE NEGATIVES; HIGH RESOLUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY; RESIDUE; SELECTED REACTION MONITORING; TANDEM TRIPLE QUADRUPOLE MASS SPECTROMETRY;

MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ACRIFLAVINE; CIPROFLOXACIN; CLOTRIMAZOLE; DANOFLOXACIN; DIFLOXACIN; DOXYCYCLINE; ENOXACIN; ENROFLOXACIN; FLUMEQUINE; LIVER EXTRACT; LOMEFLOXACIN; MARBOFLOXACIN; MINOCYCLINE; NALIDIXIC ACID; NORDIFLOXACIN; NORFLOXACIN; OFLOXACIN; OXOLINIC ACID; OXYTETRACYCLINE; SULFACETAMIDE; SULFACHLORPYRIDAZINE; SULFACLOZINE; SULFADIAZINE; SULFADIMETHOXINE; SULFADIMIDINE; SULFADOXINE; SULFAGUANIDINE; SULFAMERAZINE; UNINDEXED DRUG; VETERINARY DRUG; DRUG RESIDUE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DETERMINATION; EXTRACTION; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MONITORING; PERFORMANCE; PHASE TRANSITION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUADRUPOLE MASS SPECTROMETRY; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; UBIQUITINATION; ARTIFACT; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STANDARDS;

BOVINAE;

ARTIFACTS; DRUG RESIDUES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; VETERINARY DRUGS;

EID: 84920559884     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: 18734324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.11.034     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Commission Decision (2002/657/EC). Implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results, Official Journal of the European Communities, (2002).
2. Lehotay S.J., Mastovska K., Amirav A., Fialkov A.B., Alon T., Martos P.A., de Kok A., Fernández-Alba A.R. Identification and confirmation of chemical residues in food by chromatography-mass spectrometry and other techniques. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 27(11):1070-1090.
3. Gómez-Ramos M.M., Ferrer C., Malato O., Agüera A., Fernández-Alba A.R. Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry for pesticide residue analysis in fruit and vegetables: Screening and quantitative studies. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1287:24-37.
4. Thurman E., Ferrer I., Zavitsanos P., Zweigenbaum J. Analysis of isobaric pesticide in pepper with high-resolution liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry: complementary or redundant?. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61:2340-2347.
5. Kaufmann A., Butcher P., Maden K., Walker S., Widmer M. Development of an improved high resolution mass spectrometry based multi-residue method for veterinary drugs in various food matrices. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2011, 700:86-94.
6. Berendsen L.A., Stolker M.W. The (un)certainty of selectivity in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2013, 24:154-163.
7. Stolker A.A., Stephany R.W., van Ginkel L.A. Identification of residues by LC-MS. The application of new EU guidelines. Analusis 2000, 28:947-951.
8. Vanhaecke L., Gowik P., Le Bizec B., Van Gindel L., Bichon E., Blokland M., De Brabander H. European analytical criteria: past, present, and future. J. AOAC 2011, 94:360-372.
9. Kaufmann A., Butcher P., Maden K., Widmer M., Giles K., Uría D. Are liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem quadrupole fragmentation ratios unequivocal confirmation criteria?. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23:985-998.
10. Gallart-Ayala H., Nuñez O., Moyano E., Galceran M., Martins C. Preventing false negatives with high-resolution mass spectrometry: the benzophenone case. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 25:3161-3166.
11. Ibáñez M., Gracia-Lor E., Sancho J.V., Hernández F. Importance of MS selectivity and chromatographic separation in LC-MS/MS-based methods when investigating pharmaceutical metabolites in water. Dipyrone as a case of study. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 47:1040-1046.
12. Schürmann V., Dvorak C., Crüzer P., Butcher A., Kaufmann A. False-positive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry confirmation of sebuthylazine residues using the identification points system according to EU directive 2002/657/EC due to a biogenic insecticide in tarragon. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23:1196-1200.
13. Kaufmann A., Butcher P., Maden K., Walker S., Widmer M. Comprehensive comparison of liquid chromatography selectivity as provided by two types of liquid chromatography detectors (high resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry): where is the crossover point?. Anal. Chim Acta. 2010, 673:60-72.
14. Gadaj A., di Lullo V., Cantwell H., McCormack M., Furey A., Danaher M. Determination of nitroimidazole residues in aquaculture tissue using ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 950:105-115.
15. Kumar P., Rúbies A., Centrich F., Companyó R. A false positive case due to matrix interference in the analysis of ronidazole residues in muscle tissue using LC-MS/MS. Meat Sci. 2014, 97:214-219.
16. Kaufmann A., Widmer M., Maden K. Signal suppression can bias selected reaction monitoring ratios. Implications for the confirmation of positive findings in residue testing. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 28:899-907.
17. Stoev G., Xuan Y., Peycheva M., Scigelova M. Quantitative assessment of the contribution of high resolution mass spectrometric analysis to the reliability of compound confirmation. Talanta 2012, 98:19-27.
18. Boix C., Ibáñez M., Sancho J.V., León N., Yusá V., Hernández F. Qualitative screening of 116 veterinary drugs in feed by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry: potential application to quantitative analysis. Food Chem. 2014, 160:313-320.
19. Pozo Ó.J., Sancho J.V., Ibáñez M., Hernández F. Confirmation of organic micropollutants detected in environmental samples by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: achievements and pitfalls. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25:1030-1042.
20. Swiss Food Manual, SOP. 1570.1, (2006).
21. Nielen M.W.F., van Engelen M.C., Zuiderent R., Ramaker R. Screening and confirmation criteria for hormone residue analysis using liquid chromatography accurate mass time-of-flight, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance and orbitrap mass spectrometry techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 586:122-129.
22. Kaufmann A., Walker S. Evaluation of the interrelationship between mass resolving power and mass error tolerances for targeted bioanalysis using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27:347-356.
23. Kaufmann A., Butcher P. Strategies to avoid false negative findings in residue analysis using liquid chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20:3566-3572.
24. Kaufmann A., Butcher P., Maden K., Walker S., Widmer M. Quantitative and confirmative performance of liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry compared to tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2011, 25:979-992.