A novel mechanism for Prp5 function in prespliceosome formation and proofreading the branch site sequence

Genes and Development

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 81-93

  Liang, Wen Wei ^a,b,c   Cheng, Soo Chen ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Branch site; Proofreading; Prp5; Splicing; U2

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; DEAD BOX PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA PRECURSOR; PROTEIN PRP5; SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; SMALL NUCLEAR RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; PROTEIN BINDING; PRP5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RAD53 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RNA PRECURSOR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IN VITRO STUDY; PRESPLICEOSOME; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RNA SPLICING; SPLICEOSOME; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; RIBONUCLEOPROTEINS, SMALL NUCLEAR; RNA PRECURSORS; RNA SPLICING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPLICEOSOMES;

EID: 84920501201     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.253708.114     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Berglund JA, Chua K, Abovich N, Reed R, Rosbash M. 1997. The splicing factor BBP interacts specifically with the pre-mRNA branchpoint sequence UACUAAC. Cell 89: 781–787.
2. Berglund JA, Abovich N, Rosbash M. 1998. A cooperative interaction between U2AF65 and mBBP/SF1 facilitates branchpoint region recognition. Genes Dev 13: 858–867.
3. Brow DA. 2002. Allosteric cascade of spliceosome activation. Annu Rev Genet 36: 333–360.
4. Burgess SM, Guthrie C. 1993a. A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing fidelity: the RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs usage of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell 73: 1377–1392.
5. Burgess SM, Guthrie C. 1993b. Beat the clock: paradigms for NTPases in the maintenance of biological fidelity. Trends Biochem Sci 18: 381–384.
6. Burgess S, Couto JR, Guthrie C. 1990. A putative ATP binding protein influences the fidelity of branchpoint recognition in yeast splicing. Cell 60: 705–717.
7. Chan S-P, Cheng S-C. 2005. The Prp19-associated complex is required for specifying interactions of U5 and U6 with PremRNA during spliceosome activation. J Biol Chem 280: 31190–31199.
8. Chan S-P, Kao D-I, Tsai W-Y, Cheng S-C. 2003. The Prp19passociated complex in spliceosome activation. Science 302: 279–282.
9. Cheng S-C, Abelson J. 1987. Spliceosome assembly in yeast. Genes Dev 1: 1014–1027.
10. Cheng S-C, Newman A, Lin R-J, McFarland GD, Abelson JN. 1990. Preparation and fractionation of yeast splicing extract. Methods Enzymol 181: 89–96.
11. Chiang T-W, Cheng S-C. 2013. A weak spliceosome-binding domain of Yju2 functions in first step and bypasses Prp16 in second step of splicing. Mol Cell Biol 33: 1746–1755.
12. Fabrizio P, Dannenberg J, Dube P, Kastner B, Stark H, Urlaub H, Luhrmann R. 2009. The evolutionarily conserved core design of the catalytic activation step of the yeast spliceosome. Mol Cell 36: 593–608.
13. Gozani O, Potashkin J, Reed R. 1998. A potential role for U2AF SAP155 interactions in recruiting U2 snRNP to the branch site. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4752–4760.
14. Hilliker AK, Mefford MA, Staley JP. 2007. U2 toggles iteratively between the stem IIa and stem IIc conformations to promote pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev 21: 821–834.
15. Huang Y-H, Chung C-S, Kao D-I, Kao T-C, Cheng S-C. 2014. Sad1 counteracts Brr2-mediated dissociation of U4/U6.U5 in tri-snRNP homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol 34: 210–220.
16. Kistler AL, Guthrie C. 2001. Deletion of MUD2, the yeast homolog of U2AF65, can bypass the requirement for Sub2, an essential spliceosomal ATPase. Genes Dev 15: 42–49.
17. Koodathingal P, Novak T, Piccirilli JA, Staley JP. 2010. The DEAH box ATPases Prp16 and Prp43 cooperate to proofread 59 splice site cleavage during pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell 39: 385–395.
18. Kosowski TR, Keys HR, Quan TK, Ruby SW. 2009. DExD/H-box Prp5 protein is in the spliceosome during most of the splicing cycle. RNA 15: 1345–1362.
19. Linder P, Tanner NK, Banroques J. 2001. From RNA helicases to RNPases. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 339–341.
20. Mayas RM, Maita H, Staley JP. 2006. Exon ligation is proofread by the DExD/H-box ATPase Prp22p. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 482–490.
21. McPheeters DS, Muhlenkamp P. 2003. Spatial organization of protein–RNA interactions in the branch site–39 splice site region during pre-mRNA splicing in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 23: 4174–4186.
22. O’Day CL, Dalbadie-McFarland G, Abelson J. 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Prp5 protein has RNA-dependent ATPase activity with specificity for U2 small nuclear RNA. J Biol Chem 271: 33261–33267.
23. Parker R, Siliciano P, Guthrie C. 1987. Recognition of the TACTAAC box during mRNA splicing in yeast involves base-pairing to the U2-like snRNA. Cell 49: 229–239.
24. Perriman R, Ares M Jr. 2000. ATP can be dispensable for prespliceosome formation in yeast. Genes Dev 14: 97–107.
25. Perriman R, Ares M Jr. 2007. Rearrangement of competing U2 RNA helices within the spliceosome promotes multiple steps in splicing. Genes Dev 21: 821–834.
26. Perriman R, Ares M Jr. 2010. Invariant U2 snRNA nucleotides form a stem loop to recognize the intron early in splicing. Mol Cell 38: 416–427.
27. Perriman R, Barta I, Voeltz GK, Abelson J, Ares M Jr. 2003. ATP requirement for Prp5p function is determined by Cus2p and the structure of U2 small nuclear RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 13857–13862.
28. Query CC, Konarska MM. 2004. Suppression of multiple substrate mutations by spliceosomal prp8 alleles suggests functional correlations with ribosomal ambiguity mutants. Mol Cell 14: 343–353.
29. Ruby SW, Chang T-H, Abelson J. 1993. Four yeast spliceosomal proteins (PRP5, PRP9, PRP11, and PRP21) interact to promote U2 snRNP binding to pre-mRNA. Genes Dev 7: 1909–1925.
30. Schwer B, Guthrie C. 1992. A conformational rearrangement in the spliceosome is dependent on PRP16 and ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J 11: 5033–5040.
31. Shao W, Kim H-S, Cao Y, Xu Y-Z, Query CC. 2012. A U1–U2 snRNP interaction network during intron definition. Mol Cell Biol 32: 470–478.
32. Smith DJ, Konarska MM, Query CC. 2009. Insights into branch nucleophile positioning and activation from an orthogonal pre-mRNA splicing system in yeast. Mol Cell 34: 333–343.
33. Staley JP, Guthrie C. 1998. Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: motors, clocks, springs, and things. Cell 92: 315–326.
34. Tanaka N, Aronova A, Schwer B. 2007. Ntr1 activates the Prp43 helicase to trigger release of lariat-intron from the spliceosome. Genes Dev 21: 2312–2325.
35. Tarn W-Y, Lee K-R, Cheng S-C. 1993. The yeast PRP19 protein is not tightly associated with small nuclear RNAs, but appears to associate with the spliceosome after binding of U2 to the pre-mRNA and prior to formation of the functional spliceosome. Mol Cell Biol 13: 1883–1891.
36. Tarn W-Y, Hsu C-H, Huang K-T, Chen H-R, Kao H-Y, Lee K-R, Cheng S-C. 1994. Functional association of essential splicing factor(s) with PRP19 in a protein complex. EMBO J 13: 2421–2431.
37. Tseng C-K, Liu H-L, Cheng S-C. 2011. DEAH-box ATPase Prp16 has dual roles in remodeling of the spliceosome in catalytic steps. RNA 17: 145–154.
38. Wahl MC, Will CL, Lü hrmann RL. 2009. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 136: 701–718.
39. Wang Q, Zhang L, Lynn B, Rymond BC. 2008. A BBP-Mud2p heterodimer mediates branchpoint recognition and influences splicing substrate abundance in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 2787–2798.
40. Warkocki Z, Odenwälder P, Schmitzová J, Platzmann F, Stark H, Urlaub H, Ficner R, Fabrizio P, Lü hrmann R. 2009. Reconstitution of both steps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae splicing with purified spliceosomal components. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 1237–1243.
41. Wells SE, Ares M Jr. 1994. Interactions between highly conserved U2 small nuclear RNA structures and Prp5p, Prp9p, Prp11p, and Prp21p proteins are required to ensure integrity of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 14: 6337–6349.
42. Will CL, Lü hrmann R. 2011. Spliceosome structure and function. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003707.
43. Will CL, Urlauh H, Achsel T, Gentzel M, Wilm M, Lü hrmann R. 2002. Characterization of novel SF3b and 17S U2 snRNP proteins, including a human Prp5p homologue and an SF3b DEAD-box protein. EMBO J 21: 4978–4988.
44. Xu Y-Z, Query CC. 2007. Competition between the ATPase Prp5 and branch region-U2 snRNA pairing modulates the fidelity of spliceosome assembly. Mol Cell 28: 838–849.
45. Xu Y-Z, Newnham CM, Kameoka S, Huang T, Konarska MM, Query CC. 2004. Prp5 bridges U1 and U2 snRNPs and enables stable U2 snRNP association with intron RNA. EMBO J 23: 376–385.
46. Yan D, Perriman R, Igel H, Howe KJ, Neville M, AresMJr. 1998. CUS2, a yeast homolog of human Tat-SF1, rescues function of misfolded U2 through an unusual RNA recognition motif. Mol Cell Biol 18: 5000–5009.
47. Yang F, Wang X-Y, Zhang Z-M, Pu J, Fan Y-J, Zhou J, Query CC, Xu Y-Z. 2013. Splicing proofreading at 59 splice sites by ATPase Prp28p. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 4660–4670.
48. Zhang ZM, Yang F, Zhang J, Tang Q, Li J, Gu J, Zhou J, Xu YZ. 2013. Crystal structure of Prp5p reveals interdomain interactions that impact spliceosome assembly. Cell Rep 5: 1269–1278.