Ten years on: Realizing delayed intentions

Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-27

  Ellis, Judi A ^a   Freeman, J E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920476492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809945     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Altmann, E. M., and Trafton, J. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39–83.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bahrick, H. P., and Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 344–349.
4. Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Towards establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181–199.
5. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention and control in social interaction. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Brandimonte, M. A. (1991). Ricordare il futuro Remembering the future. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 351–374.
7. Brandimonte, M. A., and Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness and retention interval on prospective remembering. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 565–587.
8. Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., and Schwartz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological Science, 12, 457–461.
9. Cohen, A.-L., Jaudas, A., and Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005, July). Working memory load and self-regulatory strategies modulate the cost of remembering to remember. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Prospective Memory, Zurich.
10. Cohen, A.-L., West, R., and Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Modulation of the prospective and retrospective components of memory for intentions in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 8, 1–13.
11. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., and Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345–360.
12. Craik, F. I. M. (1987). A functional account of age differences inmemory. In F. Klix and H.Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Dockree, P. M., and Ellis, J. A. (2001). Forming and canceling everyday intentions: Implications for prospective remembering. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1139–1145.
14. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 229–325). New York: Academic. (Original work published 1887.)
15. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., and Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7, 471–478.
16. Einstein, G. O., and McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O.Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Einstein, G. O., and McDaniel, M. A. (2005, July). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes in prospective memory.Paper presented at the 2nd International Conferenceon Prospective Memory, Zurich.
18. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Cunfer, A. R., and Guynn, M. J. (1995).Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influence of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996–1007.
19. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Smith, R. E., and Shaw, P. (1998). Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions. Psychological Science, 9, 284–288.
20. Einstein, G.O., McDaniel, M.A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., and Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 15, 671–683.
21. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 134, 327–342.
22. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Williford, C. L., Pagan, J. L., and Dismukes, R. K. (2003).Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 147–162.
23. Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Ellis, J. A., and Milne, A. (1995, November). Realizing intentions in a multiple task environment. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
25. Ellis, J. A., and Milne, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 862–887.
26. Ellis, J. A., Milne, A., and McGann, D. (1997). Prospective remembering in a multiple-task environment. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
27. Ellis, J. A., Milne, A., and McGann, D. (March, 1997). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering. Paper presented at the International Workshop on ProspectiveMemory, Leuven, Belgium.
28. Ellis, J. A., and Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). Recollecting naturally-occurring intentions: A study of cognitive and affective factors. Memory, 1, 107–126.
29. Eschen, A., Freeman, J. E., Dietrich, T., Martin, M., Ellis, J. A., Martin-Fiori, E. et al. (in press). Motor brain regions involved in the encoding of delayed intentions: An fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology.
30. Freeman, J. E., and Ellis, J. A. (2003a). Aging and the accessibility of performed and to-be-performed activities. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 298–309.
31. Freeman, J. E., and Ellis, J. A. (2003b). The intention-superiority effect for naturally-occurring intentions: The role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adults. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 215–228.
32. Freeman, J. E., and Ellis, J. A. (2003c). The representation of delayed intentions: A prospective subject-performed task? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 976–992.
33. Freeman J. E and Ellis J. A. (2007). Retrieval cue activation in prospective memory tasks: Effects of age and intention completion. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mindsets. In E. T. Higgins and R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.
35. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
36. Gollwitzer, P. M., and Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.
37. Gollwitzer, P. M., and Schaal, B. (1998). Metacognition in action: The importance of implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 124–136.
38. Goschke, T., and Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
39. Goschke, T. and Kuhl, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G.O. Einstein and M.A. McDaniel (Eds.). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Guynn, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective memory: When reminders fail. Memory and Cognition, 26, 287–298.
41. Harvey, D. A., and Ellis, J. A. (2005, July). Prospective memory and output monitoring in older adults: Deficits in attention or reduced confidence? Poster presented at the 2nd International Conference on Prospective Memory, Zurich.
42. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., and Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160–1169.
43. Kliegel, M., Eschen, A., and Thöne-Otto, A. I. T. (2004). Planning and realization of complex intentions in traumatic brain injury and normal aging. Brain and Cognition, 56, 43–54.
44. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (2001). Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory. Memory, 9, 1–11.
45. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553–561.
46. Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (2000). Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1041–1049.
47. Koriat, A., and Ben-Zur, H. (1988). Remembering that I did it: Processes and deficits in output monitoring. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 203–208). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
48. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., and Nussbaum, A. (1990). Encoding information for future enactment: Memory for to-be-performed versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory and Cognition, 18, 568–578.
49. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and actions versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). New York: Springer.
50. Kvavilashvili, L. (2005, July). Automatic or controlled? Rehearsal and retrieval processes in everyday time- and event-based prospective memory tasks. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Prospective Memory, Zurich.
51. Kvavilashvili, L., and Ellis, J. A. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classification. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
52. Lebiere, C., and Lee, F. J. (2001). Intention superiority effect: A context-sensitivity account. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (pp. 139–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
53. Leynes, P. A., Allan, J. D., and Marsh, R. L. (1998). Topographic differences in CNV amplitude reflect different preparatory processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 33–44.
54. Leynes, P. A., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Allen, J. D., and Mayhorn, C. B. (2003). Investigating the encoding and retrieval of intentions with event-related potentials. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 1–18.
55. Liu, L. L., and Park, D. C. (2004). Aging and medical adherence: The use of automatic processes to achieve effortful things. Psychology and Aging, 19, 318–325.
56. Loftus, E. F. (1971). Memory for intentions: The effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity. Psychonomic Science, 23, 315–316.
57. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. E., and Bink, M. L. (1998). The activation of completed, uncompleted and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350–361.
58. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., and Bryan, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions. Memory and Cognition, 27, 320–327.
59. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., and Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 68–75.
60. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Hancock, T. W., and Munsayac, K. (2002). Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 30, 302–311.
61. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., and Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 652–659.
62. Martin, M., Kliegel, M., and McDaniel, M. A. (2003). The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 195–206.
63. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., and Della Sala, S. (2000). Retrieval of performed versus to-be-performed tasks: Anatutralistic study of the intention-superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 83–98.
64. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., Logie, R., Della Sala, S., and Smith, G. (2002). Prospective memory across the lifespan. In P. Graf and N. Ohta (Eds.), Lifespan development of human memory (pp. 235–256). Cambridge, MA: MI T Press.
65. McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144.
66. McGann, D., Defeyter, M. A., Reid, C., and Ellis, J. A. (2005, July). Prospective memory in children: The effects of age and target salience. Paper presented at the 2nd InternationalConference on Prospective Memory, Zurich.
67. McGann, D., Ellis, J. A., and Milne, A. (2002). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: Differential influence of attentional resources. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1021–1032.
68. McGann, D., Defeyter, M.A., Ellis, J.A. and Reid, C. (2005). Prospective memory in children:The effects of age and target salience. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Prospective Memory, Zurich.
69. Meacham, J. A., and Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327–336). San Francisco: Freeman.
70. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., and Wager, T. D.(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
71. Nowinski, J. L., and Dismukes, R. K. (2005). Effects of ongoing task context and target typicalityon prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing. Memory, 13, 649–657.
72. Penfield, W., and Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 60, 389–443.
73. Sellen, A. J., Louie, G., Harris, J. E., and Wilkins, A. J. (1997). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5, 483–507.
74. Shallice, T., and Burgess, P. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727–741.
75. Shallice, T., Fletcher, P., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., and Dolan, R. J. (1994). Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature, 368, 633–635.
76. Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347–361.
77. Smith, R. E., and Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777.
78. Watanabe, H. (2003). Effects of encoding style, expectation of retrieval mode, and retrieval style on memory for action phrases. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 707–727.
79. Watanabe, H., and Kawaguchi, J. (1999). Temporal aspects of everyday activities and events. Studies in Informatics and Science (Nagoya University), 10, 159–178.
80. Watanabe, H., and Kawaguchi, J. (2005). Representation of plans: Activation in memory. Memory, 13, 174–188.
81. West, R., and Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264–272.
82. Wilkins, A.J. (1986). Remembering to do things in the laboratory and everyday life. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 74(Spple. 109), 109–112.
83. Winograd, E. (1988). Some observations on prospective remembering. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 348–353). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
84. Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1–15.
85. Zhang, X., and Ellis, J. A. (2006). The development of prospective remembering: Effects of cue specificity. Unpublished manuscript.
86. Zhang, X. and Ellis, J.A. (2007). The development of prospective memory: Influence of target specificity. Unpublished manuscript.