Herbivore-induced plant volatiles as a rich source of information for arthropod predators: Fundamental and applied aspects

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 35-42

  Dicke, Marcel ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Crop protection; Herbivore; Herbivore induced plant volatiles; Predator

Indexed keywords

NATURAL SCIENCES;

COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; CROP PROTECTION; HERBIVORE; PARASITIC PLANTS; PLANT FITNESS; PLANT VOLATILES; PREDATOR; SOURCES OF INFORMATIONS;

ANIMALS;

EID: 84920439623     PISSN: 09704140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M. W. How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 38, 148-165 (1988).
2. Dicke, M., Van Beek, T. A., Posthumus, M. A., Ben Dom, N., Van Bokhoven, H. & De Groot, A. E. Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions. Involvement of host plant in its production. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 381-396 (1990).
3. Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H. & Lewis, W. J. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250, 1251-1253 (1990).
4. Baldwin, I. T. & Schultz, J. C. Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221, 277-279 (1983).
5. Rhoades, D. F. Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: Evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. In Plant resistance to insects. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 208 (ed. P. A. Hedin), pp. 55-68. Washington D. C. (1983).
6. Rhoades, D. F. Pheromonal communication between plants. In Chemically mediated interactions between plants and other organisms. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry (eds. G. A. Cooper-Driver, T. Swain & E. C. Conn), pp. 195-218. Plenum Press, New York (1985).
7. Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M. W. Does it pay plants to advertize for bodyguards? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of induced synomone production. In Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants (eds. H. Lambers, M. L. Cambridge, H. Konings & T. L. Pons), pp. 341-358. The Hague, SPB Publishing (1989).
8. Dicke, M. & Baldwin, I. T. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the 'cry for help'. Trends in Plant Science 15, 167-175 (2010).
9. Hare, J. D. Ecological role of volatiles produced by plants in response to damage by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 56, 161-180 (2011).
10. Kessler, A. & Heil, M. The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection. Functional Ecology 25, 348-357 (2011).
11. Arimura, G., Kost, C. & Boland, W. Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1734, 91-111 (2005).
12. Heil, M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist 178, 41-61 (2008).
13. Poelman, E. H., Bruinsma, M., Zhu, F., Weldegergis, B. T., Boursault, A. E., Jongema, Y., van Loon, J. J. A., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J. A. & Dicke, M. Hyperparasitoids use herbivoreinduced plant volatiles to locate their parasitoid host. PLOS Biology 10, e1001435 (2012).
14. Loreto, F., Dicke, M., Schnitzler, J. P. & Turlings, T. C. J. Plant volatiles and the environment. Plant, Cell & Environment 37, 1905-1908 (2014).
15. McCormick, A. C., Unsicker, S. B. & Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends in Plant Science 17, 303-310 (2012).
16. Schuman, M. C., Barthel & Baldwin, I. T. Herbivoryinduced volatiles function as defenses increasing fitness of the native plant Nicotiana attenuata in nature. eLife 1, e00007 (2012).
17. De Moraes, C. M., Mescher, M. C. & Tumlinson, J. H. Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel nonspecific females. Nature 410, 577-580 (2001).
18. Pinto-Zevallos, D. M., Hellen, H., Hakola, H., van Nouhuys, S. & Holopainen, J. K. Induced defenses of Veronica spicata: Variability in herbivore-induced volatile organic compounds. Phytochemistry Letters 6, 653-656 (2013).
19. Runyon, J. B., Mescher, M. C. & De Moraes, C. M. Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants. Science 313, 1964-1967 (2006).
20. Karban, R., Yang, L. H. & Edwards, K. F. Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 17, 44-52 (2014).
21. Mumm, R. & Dicke, M. Variation in natural plant products and the attraction of bodyguards involved in indirect plant defense. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88, 628-667 (2010).
22. Rasmann, S. & Turlings, T. C. J. First insights into specificity of belowground tritrophic interactions. Oikos 117, 362-369 (2008).
23. Rasmann, S., Kollner, T. G., Degenhardt, J., Hiltpold, I., Toepfer, S., Kuhlmann, U., Gershenzon, J. & Turlings, T. C. J. Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insectdamaged maize roots. Nature 434, 732-737 (2005).
24. Amo, L., Jansen, J. J., van Dam, N. M., Dicke, M. & Visser, M. E. Birds exploit herbivore-induced plant volatiles to locate herbivorous prey. Ecology Letters 16, 1348-1355 (2013).
25. Mantyla, E., Klemola, T. & Haukioja, E. Attraction of willow warblers to sawfly-damaged mountain birches: novel function of inducible plant defences? Ecology Letters 7, 915-918 (2004).
26. Sabelis, M. W. & Van de Baan, H. E. Location of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 33, 303-314 (1983).
27. Gullan, P. J. & Cranston, P. S. The Insects: An outline of entomology. 4th edition. USA, Blackwell Publishing. pp. 584 (2010).
28. Dattilo, W., Izzo, T. J., Inouye, B. D., Vasconcelos, H. L. & Bruna, E. M. Recognition of host plant volatiles by Pheidole minutula Mayr (Myrmicinae), an Amazonian ant-plant specialist. Biotropica 41, 642-646 (2009).
29. Ranganathan, Y. & Borges, R. M. Predatory and trophobiont-tending ants respond differently to fig and fig wasp volatiles. Animal Behaviour 77, 1539-1545 (2009).
30. Brouat, C., McKey, D., Bessière, J-M., Pascal, L. & Hossaert-McKey, M. Leaf volatile compounds and the distribution of ant patrolling in an ant-plant protection mutualism: Preliminary results on Leonardoxa (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) and Petalomyrmex (Formicidae: Formicinae). Acta Oecologica 21, 349-357 (2000).
31. Lucas-Barbosa, D., Poelman, E. H., Aartsma, Y., Snoeren, T. A. L., van Loon, J. J. A. & Dicke, M. Caught between parasitoids and predators-Survival of a specialist herbivore on leaves and flowers of mustard plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 40, 621-631 (2014).
32. Vet, L. E. M. & Dicke, M. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 141-172 (1992).
33. Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M. & Posthumus, M. A. Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant-mite interactions: Variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 1329-1354 (1994).
34. Gouinguene, S. P. & Turlings, T. C. J. The effects of abiotic factors on induced volatile emissions in corn plants. Plant Physiology 129, 1296-1307 (2002).
35. DeMoraes, G. J. & McMurtry, J. A. Physiological effect of the host plant on the suitability of Tetranychus urticae as prey for Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 32, 35-38 (1987).
36. Gnanvossou, D., Yaninek, J. S., Hanna, R. & Dicke, M. Effects of prey mite species on life history of the phytoseiid predators Typhlodromalus manihoti and Typhlodromalus aripo. Experimental and Applied Acarology 30, 265-278 (2003).
37. Furuichi, H., Yano, S., Takafuji, A. & Osakabe, M. Prey preference of the predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi Schicha is determined by spider mite webs. Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 336-339 (2005).
38. Ferry, N., Mulligan, E. A., Stewart, C. N., Tabashnik, B. E., Port, G. R. & Gatehouse, A. M. R. Prey-mediated effects of transgenic canola on a benefcial, non-target, carabid beetle. Transgenic Research 15, 501-514 (2006).
39. Venzon, M., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M. W. Prey preference and reproductive success of the generalist predator Orius laevigatus. Oikos 97, 116-124 (2002).
40. Yoneya, K., Kugimiya, S. & Takabayashi, J. Can herbivoreinduced plant volatiles inform predatory insect about the most suitable stage of its prey? Physiological Entomology 34, 379-386 (2009).
41. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W. & de Jong, M. Analysis of prey preference of phytoseiid mites as determined with an olfactometer, predation models and electrophoresis. Experimental and Applied Acarology 5, 225-241 (1988).
42. Dicke, M. & Groeneveld, A. Hierarchical structure in kairomone preference of the predatory mite Amblyseius potentillae: dietary component indispensable for diapause induction affects prey location behaviour. Ecological Entomology 11, 131-138 (1986).
43. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W. & Groeneveld, A. Vitamin A deficiency modifies response of predatory mite Amblyseius potentillae to volatile kairomone of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 1389-1396 (1986).
44. Tjallingii, W. F. & Hogen Esch, T. Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiological Entomology 18, 317-328 (1993).
45. Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., Woodcock, C. M. & Hardie, J. The chemical ecology of aphids. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 67-90 (1992).
46. Bonaventure, G., Van Doorn, A. & Baldwin, I. T. Herbivoreassociated elicitors: FAC signaling and metabolism. Trends in Plant Science 16, 294-299 (2011).
47. Peiffer, M. & Felton, G. W. Do caterpillars secrete "oral secretions"? Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 326-335 (2009).
48. Storms, J. J. H. Some physiological effects of spider mite infestation on bean plants. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 77, 154-167 (1971).
49. Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329 (2006).
50. Maffei, M. E., Arimura, G. I. & Mithofer, A. Natural elicitors, effectors and modulators of plant responses. Natural Product Reports 29, 1288-1303 (2012).
51. Hogenhout, S. A. & Bos, J. I. B. Effector proteins that modulate plant-insect interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 422-428 (2011).
52. Carolan, J. C., Caragea, D., Reardon, K. T., Mutti, N. S., Dittmer, N., Pappan, K., Cui, F., Castaneto, M., Poulain, J., Dossat, C., et al. Predicted effector molecules in the salivary secretome of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum): A dual transcriptomic/proteomic approach. Journal of Proteome Research 10, 1505-1518 (2011).
53. Eichenseer, H., Mathews, M. C., Powell, J. S. & Felton, G. W. Survey of a salivary effector in caterpillars: Glucose oxidase variation and correlation with host range. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 885-897 (2010).
54. Sarmento, R. A., Lemos, F., Bleeker, P. M., Schuurink, R. C., Pallini, A., Oliveira, M. G. A., Lima, E. R., Kant, M., Sabelis, M. W. & Janssen, A. A herbivore that manipulates plant defence. Ecology Letters 14, 229-236 (2011).
55. Zarate, S. I., Kempema, L. A. & Walling, L. L. Silverleaf whitefly induces salicylic acid defenses and suppresses effectual jasmonic acid defenses. Plant Physiology 143, 866-875 (2007).
56. Kahl, J., Siemens, D. H., Aerts, R. J., Gäbler, R., Kühnemann, F., Preston, C. A. & Baldwin, I. T. Herbivoreinduced ethylene suppresses a direct defense but not a putative indirect defense against an adapted herbivore. Planta 210, 336-342 (2000).
57. Kant, M. R., Sabelis, M. W., Haring, M. A. & Schuurink, R. C. Intraspecific variation in a generalist herbivore accounts for differential induction and impact of host plant defences. Proceeding of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences 275, 443-452 (2008).
58. Schwartzberg, E. G. & Tumlinson, J. H. Aphid honeydew alters plant defence responses. Functional Ecology 28, 386-394 (2014).
59. Chung, S. H., Rosa, C., Scully, E. D., Peiffer, M., Tooker, J. F., Hoover, K., Luthe, D. S. & Felton, G. W. Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110, 15728-15733 (2013).
60. Barr, K. L., Hearne, L. B., Briesacher, S., Clark, T. L. & Davis, G. E. Microbial symbionts in insects influence downregulation of defense genes in maize. PLOS ONE 5, e11339 (2010).
61. Zhang, P. J., Zheng, S. J., van Loon, J. J. A., Boland, W., David, A., Mumm, R. & Dicke, M. Whiteflies interfere with indirect plant defense against spider mites in Lima bean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106, 21202-21207 (2009).
62. Zhang, P. J., Broekgaarden, C., Zheng, S. J., Snoeren, T. A. L., van Loon, J. J. A., Gols, R. & Dicke, M. Jasmonate and ethylene signaling mediate whitefly-induced interference with indirect plant defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 197, 1291-1299 (2013).
63. Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., Garcia-Agustin, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, F., Newman, M. A., Pieterse, C. M. J., Poinssot, B., Pozo, M. J. et al. Priming: Getting ready for battle. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19, 1062-1071 (2006).
64. Engelberth, J., Alborn, H. T., Schmelz, E. A. & Tumlinson, J. H. Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101, 1781-1785 (2004).
65. Choh, Y., Shimoda, T., Ozawa, R., Dicke, M. & Takabayashi, J. Exposure of lima bean leaves to volatiles from herbivoreinduced conspecific plants results in emission of carnivore attractants: Active or passive process? Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 1305-1317 (2004).
66. Heil, M. & Bueno, J. C. S. Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 5467-5472 (2007).
67. Heil, M. & Ton, J. Long-distance signalling in plant defence. Trends in Plant Science 13, 264-272 (2008).
68. Pineda, A., Zheng, S. J., van Loon, J. J. A., Pieterse, C. M. J. & Dicke, M. Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends in Plant Science 15, 507-514 (2010).
69. Schausberger, P., Peneder, S., Jurschik, S. & Hoffmann, D. Mycorrhiza changes plant volatiles to attract spider mite enemies. Functional Ecology 26, 441-449 (2012).
70. Sabelis, M. W., van Alebeek, F., Bal, A., van Bilsen, J., van Heijningen, T., Kaizer, P., Kramer, G., Snellen, H., Veenenbos, R. & Vogelezang, J. Experimental validation of a simulation model of the interaction between Phytoseiulus persimilis and Tetranychus urticae on cucumber. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 6, 207-229 (1983).
71. Sabelis, M. W. & Van der Meer, J. Local dynamics of the interaction between predatory mites and two-spotted spider mites. In Dynamics of physiologically structured populations. Springer lecture notes in biomathematics 68 (eds. J. A. J. Metz & O. Diekman), pp. 322-343 Berlin, Springer (1986).
72. Sabelis, M. W., Vermaat, J. E. & Groeneveld, A. Arrestment responses of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, to steep odour gradients of a kairomone. Physiological Entomology 9, 437-446 (1984).
73. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, J. & Posthumus, M. A. Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 3091-3118 (1990).
74. Krips, O. E., Willems, P. E. L., Gols, R., Posthumus, M. A., Gort, G. & Dicke, M. Comparison of cultivars of ornamental crop Gerbera jamesonii on production of spider mite-induced volatiles, and their attractiveness to the predator Phytoseiulus persimilis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27, 1355-1372 (2001).
75. Gouinguene, S., Degen, T. & Turlings, T. C. J. Variability in herbivore-induced odour emissions among maize cultivars and their wild ancestors (teosinte). Chemoecology 11, 9-16 (2001).
76. Degenhardt, J., Gershenzon, J., Baldwin, I. T. & Kessler, A. Attracting friends to feast on foes: engineering terpene emission to make crop plants more attractive to herbivore enemies. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14, 169-176 (2003).
77. Kappers, I. F., Hoogerbrugge, H., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Dicke, M. Variation in herbivory-induced volatiles among cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties has consequences for the attraction of carnivorous natural enemies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 150-160 (2011).
78. Kappers, I. F., Aharoni, A., van Herpen, T. W. J. M., Luckerhoff, L. L. P., Dicke, M. & Bouwmeester, H. J. Genetic engineering of terpenoid metabolism attracts, bodyguards to Arabidopsis. Science 309, 2070-2072 (2005).
79. Degenhardt, J., Hiltpold, I., Kollner, T. G., Frey, M., Gierl, A., Gershenzon, J., Hibbard, B. E., Ellersieck, M. R. & Turlings, T. C. J. Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insectkilling nematodes to control a major pest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106, 13213-13218 (2009).
80. Brillada, C., Nishihara, M., Shimoda, T., Garms, S., Boland, W., Maffei, M. E. & Arimura, G. Metabolic engineering of the C-16 homoterpene TMTT in Lotus japonicus through overexpression of (E, E)-geranyllinalool synthase attracts generalist and specialist predators in different manners. New Phytologist 200, 1200-1211 (2013).
81. Janssen, A. Plants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90, 191-198 (1999).
82. Poelman, E. H., Oduor, A. M. O., Broekgaarden, C., Hordijk, C. A., Jansen, J. J., Van Loon, J. J. A., Van Dam, N. M., Vet, L. E. M. & Dicke, M. Field parasitism rates of caterpillars on Brassica oleracea plants are reliably predicted by differential attraction of Cotesia parasitoids. Functional Ecology 23, 951-962 (2009).
83. James, D. G. Synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as field attractants for beneficial insects. Environmental Entomology 32, 977-982 (2003).
84. James, D. G. Further feld evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31, 481-495 (2005).
85. James, D. G. & Price, T. S. Field-testing of methyl salicylate for recruitment and retention of beneficial insects in grapes and hops. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 1613-1628 (2004).
86. Kelly, J. L., Hagler, J. R. & Kaplan, I. Semiochemical lures reduce emigration and enhance pest control services in open-field predator augmentation. Biological Control 71, 70-77 (2014).
87. Kaplan, I. Attracting carnivorous arthropods with plant volatiles: The future of biocontrol or playing with fire? Biological Control 60, 77-89 (2012).
88. Cook, S. M., Khan, Z. R. & Pickett, J. A. The use of pushpull strategies in integrated pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 375-400 (2007).
89. Khan, Z. R., Ampong-Nyarko, K., Chiliswa, P., Hassanali, A., Kimani, S., Lwande, W., Overholt, W. A., Pickett, J. A., Smart, L. E., Wadhams, L. J. et al. Intercropping increases parasitism of pests. Nature 388, 631-632 (1997).
90. Khan, Z. R., Midega, C. A. O., Pittchar, J. O., Murage, A. W., Birkett, M. A., Bruce, T. J. A. & Pickett, J. A. Achieving food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor through push-pull innovation by 2020. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences 369, 20120284 (2014).