Shared cognition and group learning

Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving and Assessing How Groups Learn in Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 73-90

  Tindale, R Scott ^a   Stawiski, Sarah ^a   Jacobs, Elizabeth ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920396231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809747     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baumann, M. R., & Bonner, B. L. Effects of temporal perspective on the development of transactive memory systems. Paper presented at the 1st Annual Conference of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research, Pittsburgh, PA.
4. Brauner, E., & Scholl, W. (2000). The information processing approach as a perspective for group research. Group Processes and Intergroup Relation, 3, 115-122.
5. Budescu, D., & Maciejousky, B. (in press). Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
6. Burt, R. S. (1999). Entrepreneurs, distrust, and third parties: A strategic look at the dark side of dense networks. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messic k (Eds.), Shared cognitions in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 213-244). Florence, KY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellon (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current directions (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Crano, W. D. (2001). Social influence, social identity, and ingroup leniency. In C. K. W. De Dreu, & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 122-143). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
9. Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 157-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83-97.
11. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
12. De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The important of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201.
13. Dykema-Engblade, A., & Tindale, R. S. (2006). The roles of redundancy and expertise in group decision making and recall. In T. Nielsen (Chair), Information sharing within teams: Dynamics and performance effects. Symposium conducted at the Academy of Management Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.
14. Ensley, M. D., & Pearce, C. L. (2001). Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145-160.
15. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16. Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1983). The effects of problem content and negation on Wason’s selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 519-533.
17. Helmreich, R. L. (1997). Managing human error in aviation. Scientific American, 276, 62-67.
18. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
19. Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 56-85). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
20. Hogg, M. A., & Mullen, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
21. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193.
22. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
23. Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intra-group conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
24. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kameda, T., Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (2003). Cognitions, preferences, and social sharedness: Past, present, and future directions in group decision making. In S. L. Schneider, & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56-71.
27. Kramer, R. M., Hanna, B. A., Su, S., & Wei, J. (2001). Collective identity, collective trust, and social capital: Linking group identification and group cooperation. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 173-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Larson, J. R., Jr., (2006). Cognitive diversity and strong synergy: Modeling the impact of variability in members’ problem-solving strategies on group problem- solving performance. Paper presented at the International Network of Group Research annual conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
29. Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482-495.
30. Latane, B., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2001). Dynamic social impact and the consolidation, clustering, correlation, and continuing diversity of culture. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 235-258). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
31. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Laughlin, P. R., & Adamopoulos, J. (1982). Social decision schemes on intellective tasks. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 81-96). London: Academic Press.
33. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than their best member on letters-to-numbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605-620.
34. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
35. Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651.
36. Laughlin, P. R., & Sweeney, J. D. (1977). Individual-to-group and group-to-individual transfer in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 246-254.
37. Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135-144.
38. Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L., & Choi, H. (2001). Group socialization and newcomer innovation. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 86-106). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
39. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R. L., & Argote, L. (1995). Group vs. individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
40. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Clemence, A. (2001). Group processes and the construction of social representations. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 311-333). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
41. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Mohammed, S. (2001). Toward an understanding of cognitive consensus in a group- decision making context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 408-425.
44. Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89-106.
45. Moreland, R. L. (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 80-110). Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
46. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, E. J. Posavic, F. B. Bryant, E. Henderson- King, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, et al. (Eds.), Social psychological application of social issues: Applications of theory and research on groups (Vol. 4, pp. 37-60) New York: Plenum Press.
47. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
48. Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1982). Social interaction in cognitive development. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 241-256). London: Academic Press.
49. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
50. Peterson, E., Mitchell, T., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. (2000). Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 296-316.
51. Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
52. Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143-160.
53. Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150).
54. Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (in press). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
55. Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 563-586.
56. Smith, C. M. (in press). Adding minority status to a source of conflict: An examination of influence processes and product quality in dyads. European Journal of Social Psychology.
57. Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 52, 156-181.
58. Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Lavine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 49-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
60. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1-22.
61. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
62. Stasson, M. F., Kameda, T., Parks, C. D., Zimmerman, S. K., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Effects of assigned group consensus requirement on group problem solving and group member learning. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 25-35.
63. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals in groups. In N. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000). Social sharedness as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 123-140.
65. Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema-Engblade, A. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Shared cognition in small groups. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
66. Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 5-18.
67. Tindale, R. S., Sheffey, S., & Filkins, J. (1990). Conjunction errors in individuals in groups. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, New Orleans, LA.
68. Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. In E. Witte, & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 81-103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. van Gindel, W. P. (2006) The use of distributed information in decision making groups: The role of shared task representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
71. van Ginkel, W. P., Tindale, R. S., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and group decision making. Paper presented at SIOP 2006, Dallas, TX.
72. Wegner, D. M. (1987). A transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen, & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
73. Weiner, E. L., Kanki, B., & Helmreich, R. L. (1993). Cockpit resource management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
75. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbel, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.
76. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye, & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about cognition? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
77. Zajonc, R. B., & Smoke, W. H. (1959). Redundancy in task assignment and group performance. Psychometrica, 24, 361-369.