When Is a Grasp a Grasp? Characterizing Some Basic Components of Human Action Processing

Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Loucks, Jeffery T ^a   Baldwin, Dare ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Action analysis; Human action processing; Infants

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920390436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170009.003.0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Andersson, A., Baldwin, D., & Saffran, J. (2005). Infants' reliance on statistical regularities in dynamic action as a clue to segmentation. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning in linguistic and nonlinguistic domains. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 359-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Baird, J. A., Baldwin, D. A., & Malle, B. F. (1999). Parsing the behavior stream: Evidence for the psychological primacy of intention boundaries. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
5. Baldwin, D. A., Andersson, A., & Saffran, J. (2005). Adults segment dynamic human action via statistical regularities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
6. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic human action. Child Development, 72, 708-717.
7. Baldwin, D., Neuhaus, E., Saylor, M., & Sobel, D. (2005). Infants find structure in action. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
8. Baldwin, D., Pederson, E., Craven, A., Andersson, A., & Bjork, H. (2005). Change detection speeds up at intention boundaries. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
9. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25 (3), 281-316.
10. Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1981). Syllables as units in infants' speech perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 247-260.
11. Bijeljac-Babic, R. J., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1993). How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Developmental Psychology, 29, 711-721.
12. Brace, N. A., Hole, G. J., Kemp, R. I., Pike, G. E., Van Duuren, M., & Norgate, L. (2001). Developmental changes in the effect of inversion: Using a picture book to investigate face recognition. Perception, 30 (1), 85-94.
13. Cohen, L. B., & Cashon, C. H. (2001). Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? Infant and Child Development, 10 (1-2), 83-92.
14. Collishaw, S. M., & Hole, G. J. (2002). Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces? Perception, 31 (3), 287-296.
15. Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., & Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatialfiltering on face identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 58 (4), 602-612.
16. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115 (2), 107-117.
17. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (3), 628-634.
18. Finkbeiner, M., Nicol, J., Greth, D., & Nakamura, K. (2002). The role of language in memory for actions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 (5), 447-457.
19. Fodor, J. A., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414-420.
20. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29 (2), 159-170.
21. Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83 (1), 49-79.
22. Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215-256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263-297.
24. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
26. Gleitman, L. R., & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 3-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Guha, G., Baldwin, D., & Craven, A. (2005). Finding structure in action. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
28. Hayes, J. R., & Clark, H. H. (1970). Experiments in the segmentation of an artificial speech analog. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 221-234). New York: Wiley.
29. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
30. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Wright Cassidy, K., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269-286.
31. Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Jusczyk, P. W., & Derrah, C. (1987). Representation of speech sounds by young infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 648-654.
33. Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
34. Kemp, R., McManus, C., & Pigott, T. (1990). Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception, 19 (4), 531-543.
35. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4 (3), 265-273.
36. Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14 (5), 402-408.
37. Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition, 27 (6), 974-985.
38. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 2, 513-536.
39. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2003). Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 6 (10), 1108-1112.
40. Loucks, J., & Pederson, E. (2005). Language and thought in English and Spanish speaker's categorization of motion events. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
41. Martin, B., & Tversky, B. (2003). Segmenting ambiguous events. Unpublished manuscript.
42. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31 (5), 553-566.
43. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
44. Newtson, D., & Enquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
45. Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84 (2), 189-219.
46. Pawley, A. (1987). Encoding events in Kalam and English: Different logics for reporting experience. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 329-360). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
47. Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2002). You go this way and I'll go that way:Developmental changes in infants' detection of correlations among static and dynamic features in motion events. Child Development, 73 (3), 682-699.
48. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14 (4), 302-308.
49. Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Devolder, A., Bodart, J.-M., Crommelinck, M., de Gelder, B., et al. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (5), 793-802.
50. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
51. Saffran, J., & Wilson, D. P. (2003). From syllables to syntax: Multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 4 (2), 273-284.
52. Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D., Baird, J. A., & LaBounty, J. (2005). Infants' online segmentation of dynamic human action. Manuscript in preparation.
53. Sharon, T. L. (2000). Parsing motion for meaning: Infants' individuation of actions from continuous motion. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60 (9-B), 4934.
54. Sharon, T. L., & Wynn, K. (1998). Individuation of actions from continuous motion. Psychological Science, 9 (5), 357-362.
55. Shipley, T. (2003). The effect of object and event orientation on perception of biological motion. Psychological Science, 14 (4), 377-380.
56. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Grammatical categories and the lexicon: Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3(pp. 57-149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
58. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9 (4), 483-484.
59. Thornton, I. M. (1998). The perception of dynamic human faces. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 58 (12-B), 6837.
60. Thornton, I. M., & Kourtzi, Z. (2002). A matching advantage for dynamic human faces. Perception, 31 (1), 113-132.
61. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79 (4), 471-491.
62. Wynn, K. (1995). Infants possess a system of numerical knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 172-177.
63. Wynn, K. (1996). Infants' individuation and enumeration of actions. Psychological Science, 7, 164-169.
64. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81 (1), 141-145.
65. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44, 889-898.
66. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., et al. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 651-655.
67. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 321.
68. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 2958.
69. Zheng, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Thought before language: How deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures. Cognition, 85, 145-175.