The embodied actor in multiple frames of reference

Embodiment, Ego-Space, and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 145-178

  Klatzky, Roberta L ^a   Wu, Bing ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920388785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809891     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Avraamides, M., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive vs. perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science, 15, 403–408.
2. Barrett, T. E. (2006). Introductory physics with calculus as a second language. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. Enright, J. T. (1998). On the “cyclopean eye”: Saccadic asymmetry and the reliability of perceived straight-ahead. Vision Research, 38(3), 459–469.
4. Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F. (1995). Frames of reference for hand orientation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 182–195.
5. Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63–76.
6. Gaunet, F., & Berthoz, A. (2000). Mental rotation for spatial environment recognition. Cognitive Brain Research. 9, 91–102.
7. Haggard, P., Newman, C., Blundell, J., & Andrew, H. (2000). The perceived position of the hand in space. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 363–377.
8. Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition—An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1404) (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Klatzky, R. L., Lippa, Y., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2003). Encoding, learning and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, and vision. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 48–61.
10. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.
11. Larsen, A., & Bundesen, C. (1978). Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 1–20.
12. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906–921.
13. Mast, F. W., Ganis, G., Christie, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Four types of visual mental imagery processing in upright and tilted observers. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 238–247.
14. May, M. (1996). Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beitraege, 38, 418–434.
15. May, M. (2001). Mechanismen räumlicher Perspektivenwechsel [Mechanisms of spatial perspective switches]. In R. K. Silbereisen & M. Reitzle (Eds.), Psychologie 2000(pp. 627–634). Lengerich: Pabst.
16. May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163–206.
17. Merriam, E. P., Genovese, C. R., & Colby, C. L. (2003). Spatial updating in human parietal cortex. Neuron, 39, 361–373.
18. Pani, J. R. (1993). Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: Mental imagery of rotations with oblique components. Perception, 22(7), 785–808.
19. Pani, J. R., & Dupree, D. (1994). Spatial reference systems in the comprehension of rotational motion. Perception, 23(8), 929–946.
20. Pani, J. R., Jeff res, J. A., Shippey, G. T., & Schwartz, K. (1996). Imagining projective transformations: Aligned orientations in spatial organization. Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 125–167.
21. Petit, L. S., Pegna, A. J., Mayer, E., & Hauert, C.-A. (2003). Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: Mental rotation of a body segment. Brain and Cognition, 51(1), 95–101.
22. Riecke, B. E., Von Der Heyde, M., & Bühltoff, H. H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 183–215.
23. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(1), 157–1 165.
24. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310.
25. Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 910–919.
26. Stetten, G. (2003). U.S. Patent no. 6,599,247. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
27. Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427–443.
28. Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 407–433.
29. Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics, 38(6), 483–495.
30. Wraga, M. J., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151–168.
31. Wu, B., Klatzky, R. L., Shelton, D., & Stetten, G. (2005). Psychophysical evaluation of in-situ ultrasound visualization. [Special Issue: Haptics, Virtual and Augmented Reality], IEEE Transactions on Visualizationand Computer Graphics 11, 684–699.