메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2034-2040

A subjective weighting method based on group decision making for ranking and measuring criteria values

Author keywords

Group decision making; Multi criteria decision making (MCDM); Rank order; Weighting method

Indexed keywords


EID: 84856480990     PISSN: 19918178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (19)

References (50)
  • 1
    • 79954619517 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Compatible weighting method with rank order centroid: Maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging approach
    • Ahn, B.S., 2011. Compatible weighting method with rank order centroid: Maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(3): 552-559.
    • (2011) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.212 , Issue.3 , pp. 552-559
    • Ahn, B.S.1
  • 2
    • 34848927816 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparing methods for multi attribute decision making with ordinal weights
    • Ahn, B.S., K.S. Park, 2008. Comparing methods for multi attribute decision making with ordinal weights, Computers and Operations Research, 35: 1660-1670.
    • (2008) Computers and Operations Research , vol.35 , pp. 1660-1670
    • Ahn, B.S.1    Park, K.S.2
  • 3
    • 84856443637 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking
    • Alfares, H.K., S.O. Duffuaa, 2006. Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15: 123-133.
    • (2006) Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , vol.15 , pp. 123-133
    • Alfares, H.K.1    Duffuaa, S.O.2
  • 4
    • 84856452111 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Determining criteria weights as a function of their ranks in multiple criteria decision making
    • Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, April 19-21
    • Alfares, H.K., S.O. Duffuaa, 2004. Determining criteria weights as a function of their ranks in multiple criteria decision making, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Administrative Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, April 19-21, Pages, 77-83.
    • (2004) Proceedings of the Second Conference on Administrative Sciences , pp. 77-83
    • Alfares, H.K.1    Duffuaa, S.O.2
  • 5
    • 0031166986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid and the ranking of water projects in Jordan
    • Al-Kloub, B., T. Al-Shemmeri, A. Pearman, 1997. The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid and the ranking of water projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research, 99: 278-288.
    • (1997) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.99 , pp. 278-288
    • Al-Kloub, B.1    Al-Shemmeri, T.2    Pearman, A.3
  • 6
    • 0002458367 scopus 로고
    • Selecting a best multi attribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights
    • Barron, F.H., 1992. Selecting a best multi attribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica, 80: 91-103.
    • (1992) Acta Psychologica , vol.80 , pp. 91-103
    • Barron, F.H.1
  • 7
    • 0000399057 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision quality using ranked attribute weights
    • Barron, F.H., B.E. Barret, 1996. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights, Management Science, 42: 1515-1523.
    • (1996) Management Science , vol.42 , pp. 1515-1523
    • Barron, F.H.1    Barret, B.E.2
  • 8
    • 0034346264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation
    • Bottomley, P.A., J.R. Doyle, R.H. Green, 2000. Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: direct rating versus point allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 37: 508-513.
    • (2000) Journal of Marketing Research , vol.37 , pp. 508-513
    • Bottomley, P.A.1    Doyle, J.R.2    Green, R.H.3
  • 9
    • 3943054324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of centroid and simulation approaches for selection sensitivity analysis
    • Butler, J., D.L. Olson, 1999. Comparison of centroid and simulation approaches for selection sensitivity analysis, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 8: 146-161.
    • (1999) Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , vol.8 , pp. 146-161
    • Butler, J.1    Olson, D.L.2
  • 10
  • 11
    • 0022161055 scopus 로고
    • Optimal criteria weights in repetitive multi-criteria decision making
    • Choo, E.U., W.C. Wedley, 1985. Optimal criteria weights in repetitive multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Operational Research Society, 36: 983-992.
    • (1985) Journal of Operational Research Society , vol.36 , pp. 983-992
    • Choo, E.U.1    Wedley, W.C.2
  • 12
    • 51249177285 scopus 로고
    • Internal validity assessment of conjoint estimated attribute importance weights
    • Darmon, R.Y., D. Rouzies, 1991. Internal validity assessment of conjoint estimated attribute importance weights. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19: 315-322.
    • (1991) Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , vol.19 , pp. 315-322
    • Darmon, R.Y.1    Rouzies, D.2
  • 13
    • 0002191481 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bottomley, P.A., Judging relative importance: Direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent
    • Doyle, J.R., R.H. Green, 1997. Bottomley, P.A., Judging relative importance: direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70: 65-72.
    • (1997) Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , vol.70 , pp. 65-72
    • Doyle, J.R.1    Green, R.H.2
  • 14
    • 0018495086 scopus 로고
    • Measurable multi-attribute functions
    • Dyer, J.S., R.K. Sarin, 1979. Measurable multi-attribute functions. Operations Research, 27: 810-822.
    • (1979) Operations Research , vol.27 , pp. 810-822
    • Dyer, J.S.1    Sarin, R.K.2
  • 15
    • 35548949549 scopus 로고
    • Smarts and smarter: Improved simple methods for multi attribute utility measurement
    • Edwards, W., F.H. Barron, 1994. Smarts and smarter: improved simple methods for multi attribute utility measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60: 306-325.
    • (1994) Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , vol.60 , pp. 306-325
    • Edwards, W.1    Barron, F.H.2
  • 16
    • 0036604809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure
    • Figueira, J., B. Roy, 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 139: 317-326.
    • (2002) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.139 , pp. 317-326
    • Figueira, J.1    Roy, B.2
  • 18
    • 17344379633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: An interval goal programming approach
    • Gonzalez-Pachon, J., C. Romero, 2001. Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Computers and Operations Research, 28: 827-834.
    • (2001) Computers and Operations Research , vol.28 , pp. 827-834
    • Gonzalez-Pachon, J.1    Romero, C.2
  • 19
    • 0002388032 scopus 로고
    • Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice
    • Green, P.E., V. Srinivasan, 1990. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54: 3-19.
    • (1990) Journal of Marketing , vol.54 , pp. 3-19
    • Green, P.E.1    Srinivasan, V.2
  • 20
    • 2642532766 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integration of ordinal and cardinal information in multicriteria ranking with imperfect compensation
    • Hinloopen, E., P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, 2004. Integration of ordinal and cardinal information in multicriteria ranking with imperfect compensation, European Journal of Operational Research, 158: 317-338.
    • (2004) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.158 , pp. 317-338
    • Hinloopen, E.1    Nijkamp, P.2    Rietveld, P.3
  • 22
    • 22444456217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Attribute Weighting Methods and Decision Quality in the Presence of Response Error: A Simulation Study
    • Jia, J., G.W. Fischer, J.S. Dyer, 1998. Attribute Weighting Methods and Decision Quality in the Presence of Response Error: A Simulation Study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11: 85-105.
    • (1998) Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , vol.11 , pp. 85-105
    • Jia, J.1    Fischer, G.W.2    Dyer, J.S.3
  • 23
    • 33744782637 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The risk of decision making with incomplete criteria weight information
    • Kangas, A., 2006. The risk of decision making with incomplete criteria weight information, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 195-205.
    • (2006) Canadian Journal of Forest Research , vol.36 , pp. 195-205
    • Kangas, A.1
  • 26
    • 0021859126 scopus 로고
    • Ranking with partial information: A method and an application
    • Kirkwood, C.W., R.K. Sarin, 1985. Ranking with partial information: A method and an application, Operations Research, 33: 38-48.
    • (1985) Operations Research , vol.33 , pp. 38-48
    • Kirkwood, C.W.1    Sarin, R.K.2
  • 27
    • 0037120687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria
    • Lahdelma, R., P. Salminen, J. Hokkanen, 2002. Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 142: 345-356.
    • (2002) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.142 , pp. 345-356
    • Lahdelma, R.1    Salminen, P.2    Hokkanen, J.3
  • 28
    • 0035328540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SMAA-2: Stochastic multi criteria acceptability analysis for group decision making
    • Lahdelma, R., P. Salminen, 2001. SMAA-2: Stochastic multi criteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49: 444-454.
    • (2001) Operations Research , vol.49 , pp. 444-454
    • Lahdelma, R.1    Salminen, P.2
  • 29
    • 0030575681 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART
    • Lootsma, F.A., 1996. A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART, European Journal of Operational Research, 94: 467-476.
    • (1996) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.94 , pp. 467-476
    • Lootsma, F.A.1
  • 33
    • 0033728780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set
    • Marichal, J.L., M. Roubens, 2000. Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 124, Pages 641-650.
    • (2000) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.124 , pp. 641-650
    • Marichal, J.L.1    Roubens, M.2
  • 34
    • 33746859832 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information
    • Mateos, A., A. Jiméneza, S. Ríos-Insuaa, 2006. Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research, 174: 1842-1864.
    • (2006) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.174 , pp. 1842-1864
    • Mateos, A.1    Jiméneza, A.2    Ríos-Insuaa, S.3
  • 35
    • 0019176128 scopus 로고
    • Comparing methods for weighting decision criteria
    • Nutt, P.C., 1980. Comparing methods for weighting decision criteria. OMEGA, 8: 163-172.
    • (1980) OMEGA , vol.8 , pp. 163-172
    • Nutt, P.C.1
  • 37
    • 0016047208 scopus 로고
    • Mathematical programming models for determination of attribute weights
    • Pekelman, D., S. Sen, 1974. Mathematical programming models for determination of attribute weights. Management Science, 20: 1217-1229.
    • (1974) Management Science , vol.20 , pp. 1217-1229
    • Pekelman, D.1    Sen, S.2
  • 40
    • 67349268125 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multi-attribute choice with ordinal information: A comparison of different decision rules
    • Sarabando, P., L.C. Dias, 2009. Multi-attribute choice with ordinal information: A comparison of different decision rules, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part A) 39: 545-554.
    • (2009) IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part A) , vol.39 , pp. 545-554
    • Sarabando, P.1    Dias, L.C.2
  • 41
    • 0022313542 scopus 로고
    • A method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights
    • Solymosi, T., J. Dombi, 1986. A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 26: 35-41.
    • (1986) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.26 , pp. 35-41
    • Solymosi, T.1    Dombi, J.2
  • 42
    • 0022313542 scopus 로고
    • Method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights
    • Solymosi, T., J. Dompi, 1985. Method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 26: 35-41.
    • (1985) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.26 , pp. 35-41
    • Solymosi, T.1    Dompi, J.2
  • 43
    • 0002048763 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making
    • Stillwell, W.G., D.A. Seaver, W. Edwards, 1981. A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 28, Pages 62-77.
    • (1981) Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , vol.28 , pp. 62-77
    • Stillwell, W.G.1    Seaver, D.A.2    Edwards, W.3
  • 47
    • 0027593910 scopus 로고
    • Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi attribute decision making
    • Weber, M., K. Borcherding, 1993. Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi attribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67: 1-12.
    • (1993) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.67 , pp. 1-12
    • Weber, M.1    Borcherding, K.2
  • 50
    • 0037117679 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multi-criteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review
    • Zopounidis, C., M. Doumpos, 2002. Multi-criteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 138: 229-246.
    • (2002) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.138 , pp. 229-246
    • Zopounidis, C.1    Doumpos, M.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.