The rate of change of vergence-accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort

Vision Research

Volumn 105, Issue , 2014, Pages 159-165

  Kim, Joohwan ^a   Kane, David ^a   Banks, Martin S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Cross link; Discomfort; Dynamics; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE DISCOMFORT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STEREOSCOPE; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERGENCE ACCOMMODATION CONFLICT RATE OF CHANGE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE PAIN; FEMALE; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920102723     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akeley K., Watt S.J., Girshick A.R., Banks M.S. A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2004, 23(3):804-813.
2. Banks M.S., Gepshtein S., Landy M.S. Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?. The Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(9):2077-2089.
3. Cumming B.G., Judge S.J. Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1986, 55(5):896-914.
4. Ebenholtz S.M., Fisher S.K. Distance adaptation depends on plasticity in the oculomotor control system. Perception and Psychophysics 1982, 31:551-560.
5. Fincham E.F., Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. Journal of Physiology 1957, 137(3):488-508.
6. Fry G.A. An experimental analysis of the accommodation convergence relation. American Journal of Optometry 1937, 11:64-76.
7. Henson D.B., North R. Adaptation to prism-induced heterophoria. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1980, 57(3):129-137.
8. Hillis J.M., Banks M.S. Are corresponding points fixed?. Vision Research 2001, 41:2457-2473.
9. Hoffman D.M., Girshick A.R., Akeley K., Banks M.S. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(33):1-30.
10. Hofstetter H.W. The zone of clear single binocular vision. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 1945, 22(7):301-384.
11. Howarth P.A. Potential hazards of viewing 3-D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: A review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2011, 31:111-122.
12. Hung G.K., Ciuffreda K.J. Models of the visual system 2002, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.
13. Hung G.K., Semmlow J.L. Static behavior of accommodation and vergence: Computer simulation of an interactive dual-feedback system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1980, 27(8):439-447.
14. Jung Y.J., Lee S.-I., Sohn H., Park H.W., Ro Y.M. Visual comfort assessment metric based on salient object motion information in stereoscopic video. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2012, 21(1):011008.
15. Krishnan V.V., Shirachi D., Stark L. Dynamic measures of vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1977, 54:470-473.
16. Lambooij M., IJsselsteijn W., Fortuin M., Heynderickx I. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 2009, 53(3):030201-1-030201-14.
17. Love G.D., Hoffman D.M., Hands P.J.W., Gao J., Kirby A.K., Banks M.S. High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display. Optics Express 2009, 17(18):15716-15725.
18. MacKenzie K.J., Dickson R.A., Watt S.J. Vergence and accommodation to multiple-image-plane stereoscopic displays: 'Real world' responses with practical image-plane separations?. SPIE: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications 2011, 7863:786315.
19. MacKenzie K.J., Hoffman D.M., Watt S.J. Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(8):1-20. (article no. 22).
20. Mendiburu B. 3D movie making: stereoscopic digital cinema from script to screen 2009, Focal Press, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
21. North R., Henson D.B. Adaptation to lens-induced heterophorias. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1985, 62(11):774-780.
22. Percival A.S. The prescribing of spectacles 1928, John Wright & Sons Ltd., Bristol, UK.
23. Ravikumar S., Akeley K., Banks M.S. Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays. Optics Express 2011, 19(21):20940-20952.
24. Rosenfield M., Gilmartin B. The effect of vergence adaptation on convergent accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1988, 65(2):118-126.
25. Schor C.M. The Glenn A. Fry award lecture: Adaptive regulation of accommodative vergence and vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1986, 63(8):587-609.
26. Schor C.M. A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence. Simulations of step and frequency responses. Optometry and Vision Science 1992, 69(4):258-269.
27. Schor C.M., Kotulak J.C. Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Research 1986, 26(6):927-942.
28. Semmlow J., Wetzel P. Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1979, 69:639-645.
29. Sheard C. Zones of ocular comfort. American Journal of Optometry 1930, 7:9-25.
30. Sheedy J.E., Hayes J., Engle J. Is all astenopia the same?. Optometry & Visual Science 2003, 80(11):732-739.
31. Shibata T., Kim J., Hoffman D.M., Banks M.S. The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(8):1-29. (article no. 11).
32. Speranza F., Tam W.J., Renaud R., Hur N. Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images. SPIE: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems 2006, 6055:60550B.
33. Tam W.J., Speranza F., Yano S., Shimono K., Ono H. Stereoscopic 3D-TV: Visual comfort. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 2011, 57(2):335-346.
34. Yang S.N., Sheedy J.E. Effects of vergence and accommodative responses on viewer's comfort in viewing 3D stimuli. Proceedings of SPIE 2011, 7863:1-13.