Infinite densities for Lévy walks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Rebenshtok, A ^a   Denisov, S ^b,c,d   Hanggi P ^b,e   Barkai, E ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^c LOBACHEVSKY STATE UNIVERSITY OF NIZHNY NOVGOROD   (Russian Federation)

^d SUMY STATE UNIVERSITY   (Ukraine)

^e NANOSYSTEMS INITIATIVE MUNICH NIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BALLISTICS;

ANOMALOUS DIFFUSION; ANOMALOUS DIFFUSION EXPONENT; CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM; DIFFUSION EQUATIONS; GENERAL EXPRESSION; LOW-ORDER MOMENTS; MOTION OF PARTICLES; NON-NORMALIZED DENSITIES;

DIFFUSION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DIFFUSION; MOTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DIFFUSION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTION;

EID: 84920081338     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062135     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. A. S. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3146 (1991). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.3146
2. P. Castiglione, A. Mazzino, P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, and A. Vulpiani, Physica D 134, 75 (1999). PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00031-7
3. J. P. Bouchaud and P. Le Doussal, J. Stat. Phys. 41, 225 (1985). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01020610
4. A. Zacherl, T. Geisel, J. Nierwetberg, and G. Radons, Phys. Lett. A 114, 317 (1986). PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(86)90568-2
5. J. P. Bouchaud and A. Georges, Phys. Rep. 195, 127 (1990). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90099-N
6. R. Artuso and G. Cristadoro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 244101 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.244101
7. D. N. Armstead, B. R. Hunt, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. E. 67, 021110 (2003). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.021110
8. D. P. Sanders and H. Larralde, Phys. Rev. E 73, 026205 (2006) PLEEE8 1539-3755; 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026205
9. here the authors demonstrate that even for a model of finite horizon, high-order moments behave ballistically. This is due to a nontrivial correlation between collision events, hence the infinite horizon condition is not a necessary condition for our discussion.
10. M. Courbage, M. Edelman, S. M. Saberi Fathi, and G. M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 036203 (2008). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.036203
11. T. Geisel, A. Zacherl, and G. Radons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2503 (1987). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2503
12. J. Klafter and G. Zumofen, Phys. Rev. E 49, 4873 (1994). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.49.4873
13. P. Levitz, Europhys. Lett. 39, 593 (1997). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1997-00394-5
14. E. Barkai, V. Fleurov, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1164 (2000). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1164
15. P. Barthelemy, J. Bertolotti, and D. S. Wiersma, Nature 453, 495 (2008). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature06948
16. N. Gal and D. Weihs, Phys. Rev. E 81, 020903 (R) (2010). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.020903
17. K. H. Andersen, P. Castiglione, A. Mazzino, and A. Vulpiani, Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 447 (2000). EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s100510070032
18. C. Godreche and J. M. Luck, J. Stat. Phys. 104, 489 (2001). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1010364003250
19. M. Schmiedeberg, V. Yu. Zaburdaev, and H. Stark, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2009) P12020 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/12/P12020;
20. deviations from biscaling are visible (Fig. 4, therein), possibly originating from finite-time effects.
21. R. Burioni, L. Caniparoli, and A. Vezzani, Phys. Rev. E 81, 060101 (2010). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.060101
22. R. Burioni, G. Gradenigo, A. Sarracino, A. Vezzani, and A. Vulpiani, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2013) P09022. 1742-5468 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/09/P09022
23. P. Bernabó, R. Burioni, S. Lepri, and A. Vezzani, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 67, 11 (2014). 10.1016/j.chaos.2014.06.002
24. B. A. Carreras, V. E. Lynch, D. E. Newman, and G. M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4770 (1999). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.4770
25. D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 120602 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.120602
26. A. Dechant and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230601 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.230601
27. P. de Anna, T. Le Borgne, M. Dentz, A. M. Tartakovsky, D. Bolster, and P. Davy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 184502 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.184502
28. R. Metzler and J. Klafter, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3
29. P. Siegle, I. Goychuk, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 100602 (2010) PRLTAO 0031-9007; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.100602
30. P. Siegle, I. Goychuk, and P. Hänggi, Europhys. Lett. 93, 20002 (2011) EULEEJ 0295-5075; 10.1209/0295-5075/93/20002
31. linear generalized Langevin equations with colored Gaussian noise exhibit Gaussian non-Markovian anomalous diffusion;
32. it is still left to be shown if external nonlinear fields may induce strong anomalous diffusion.
33. P. Lévy, Théorie de l'addition des variables aléatoires (Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, 1937).
34. M. F. Shlesinger, B. J. West, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1100 (1987). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1100
35. J. Klafter, A. Blumen, and M. F. Shlesinger, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3081 (1987). 0556-2791 10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3081
36. J. Klafter, M. F. Shlesinger, and G. Zumofen, Phys. Today 49, 33 (1996). PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/1.881487
37. G. Zumofen and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 47, 851 (1993). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.851
38. G. Cristadoro, T. Gilbert, M. Lenci, and D. P. Sanders, Europhys. Lett. 108, 50002 (2014). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/108/50002
39. A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. Hänggi, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 110601 (2014). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.110601
40. M. Thaler, Israel J. Math. 46, 67 (1983). ISJMAP 0021-2172 10.1007/BF02760623
41. J. Aaronson, An Introduction to Infinite Ergodic Theory (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997).
42. M. Thaler and R. Zweimüller, Probab. Theor. Relat. Fields 135, 15 (2006). PTRFEU 0178-8051 10.1007/s00440-005-0454-3
43. N. Korabel and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050601 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.050601
44. T. Akimoto and T. Miyaguchi, Phys. Rev. E. 82, 030102(R) (2010). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.030102
45. T. Akimoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 164101 (2012) PRLTAO 0031-9007; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.164101
46. here the infinite density is considered for a reduced map (Equation presented) and in this sense the system is finite.
47. N. Korabel and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 060604 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.060604
48. N. Korabel, and E. Barkai, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2013) P08010. 1742-5468 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/08/P08010
49. E. Lutz and F. Renzoni, Nat. Phys. 9, 615 (2013). 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2751
50. P. C. Holz, A. Dechant, and E. Lutz, arXiv:1310.3425 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
51. The Lévy walk in its original schematization was equipped with a constant velocity of the motion, (Equation presented), i.e., (Equation presented) [29]. Here we consider a generalization of the original model, "random walks with random velocities," where the velocity of the ballistic epochs is a random variable itself. Note that we use PDFs (Equation presented) that are symmetric and their moments are finite. Thus we remain in the domain of Levy walks;
52. see also V. Zaburdaev, M. Schmiedeberg, and H. Stark, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011119 (2008). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011119
53. A. Rebenshtok and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210601 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210601
54. A. Rebenshtok and E. Barkai, J. Stat. Phys. 133, 565 (2008). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/s10955-008-9610-3
55. E. Barkai and J. Klafter, in Chaos, Kinetics and Non-linear Dynamics in Fluids and Plasmas, Lect. Not. in Phys., v. 511, edited by S. Benkadda and G. M. Zaslavsky (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998), pp. 373-393.
56. M. Kotulski, J. Stat. Phys. 81, 777 (1995). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF02179257
57. H. Scher and M. Lax, Phys. Rev. B 7, 4491 (1973). 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.4491
58. E. Barkai, Chem. Phys. 284, 13 (2002). CMPHC2 0301-0104 10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00533-5
59. R. Kutner, Chem. Phys. 284, 481 (2002). CMPHC2 0301-0104 10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00675-4
60. M. Magdziarz, W. Szczotka, and P. Zebrowski, J. Stat. Phys. 147, 74 (2012). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/s10955-012-0465-2
61. T. H. Solomon, E. R. Weeks, and H. L. Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3975 (1993). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3975
62. A. Ott, J. P. Bouchaud, D. Langevin, and W. Urbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2201 (1990). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2201
63. Y. Jung, E. Barkai, and R. Silbey, Chem. Phys. 284, 181 (2002). CMPHC2 0301-0104 10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00547-5
64. G. Margolin and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 080601 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.080601
65. G. Margolin, V. Protasenko, M. Kuno, and E. Barkai, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 19053 (2006). JPCBFK 1520-6106 10.1021/jp061487m
66. F. D. Stefani, J. P. Hoogenboom, and E. Barkai, Phys. Today 62, 34 (2009). PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/1.3086100
67. Y. Sagi, M. Brook, I. Almog, and N. Davidson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093002 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.093002
68. D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230602 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.230602
69. O. Benichou, C. Loverdo, M. Moreau, and R. Voituriez, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 81 (2011). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.81
70. V. Zaburdaev, S. Denisov, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 069903 (2012) PRLTAO 0031-9007; 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.069903
71. V. Zaburdaev, S. Denisov, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170604 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.170604
72. A. Figueiredo, T. M. Rocha Filho, M. A. Amato, Z. T. Oliveira Jr., and R. Matsushita, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022106 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.022106
73. C. B. Mendl and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012147 (2014); PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012147
74. S. G. Das, A. Dhar, K. Saito, C. B. Mendl, and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012124 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012124
75. G. Zimbardo, S. Perri, P. Pommois, and P. Veltri, Adv. Space Res. 49, 1633 (2012) ASRSDW 0273-1177; 10.1016/j.asr.2011.10.022
76. G. Zimbardo and S. Perri, Astrophys. J. 778, 35 (2013). AJLEEY 0004-637X 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/35
77. S. Burov, J. H. Jeon, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 1800 (2011). PPCPFQ 1463-9076 10.1039/c0cp01879a
78. E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and R. Metzler, Phys. Today 65, 29 (2012). PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/PT.3.1677
79. F. Thiel, F. Flegel, and I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 010601 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.010601
80. J. A. Bucklew, Introduction to Rare Event Simulations, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York, 2004).
81. J. Tailleur and J. Kurchan, Nat. Phys. 3, 203 (2007). 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys515
82. J. C. Leitão, J. M. Viana Parente, and E. G. Altmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 220601 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.220601
83. In Fig. 4 (Equation presented) and hence the position (Equation presented) where the two solutions overlap is roughly (Equation presented) while in Fig. 5 (Equation presented), hence this point is shifted towards (Equation presented).
84. C. P. Dettmann, arXiv:1402.7010v1.
85. P. Balint, N. Chernov, and D. Dolgopyat, [http://www2.math.umd.edu/∼dolgop/CuspCLT-3.pdf].
86. Large-deviation theory deals with remote tails of distribution functions, for example, with the classical problem of summation of independent random variable with a common PDF. In this example large-deviation theory contains the Gaussian central limit theorem and extends it to the regime of large fluctuations [77]. It is still left to be seen if large-deviations theories can be used to obtain infinite densities for the Lévy walk problem.
87. H. Touchete, Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.05.002