Role of infinite invariant measure in deterministic subdiffusion

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Akimoto, Takuma ^a   Miyaguchi, Tomoshige ^b  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS; ERGODIC THEORY; INVARIANT MEASURE; LIMIT DISTRIBUTION; MEAN SQUARE DISPLACEMENT; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; SUBDIFFUSION; TIME-AVERAGED; TIME-DIFFERENCES; TRANSPORT COEFFICIENT;

DIFFUSION;

RANDOM VARIABLES;

EID: 77957193474     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.030102     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. H. Scher and E. W. Montroll, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2455 (1975). 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.2455
2. M. Matsumoto, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 30, 779 (1992). 10.1002/polb.1992.090300716
3. E. Fischer, R. Kimmich, and N. Fatkullin, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 9174 (1996). 10.1063/1.471608
4. A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette, Phys. Rev. E 66, 061104 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.061104
5. A. Kusumi, Y. Sako, and M. Yamamoto, Biophys. J. 65, 2021 (1993). 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81253-0
6. G. Seisenberger, Science 294, 1929 (2001). 10.1126/science.1064103
7. I. M. Tolić-Nørrelykke, E.-L. Munteanu, G. Thon, L. Oddershede, and K. Berg-Sorensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 078102 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.078102
8. I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.098102
9. I. Bronstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 018102 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.018102
10. A. Lubelski, I. M. Sokolov, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 250602 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.250602
11. J. Szymanski and M. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 038102 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.038102
12. Y. Meroz, I. M. Sokolov, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 81, 010101 (R) (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.010101
13. J. Aaronson, An Introduction to Infinite Ergodic Theory (American Mathematical Society, Province, Rhode Island, 1997).
14. Usually, the ensemble average of an observable f is defined by f = ∫I fdμ, where μ is an invariant measure. However, in experiments, we can perform only a finite number of observations. Thus the quantity in an initial ensemble in EAMSD [Eq. ] is finite.
15. Y. He, S. Burov, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 058101 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.058101
16. Roughly speaking, orbits visit an arbitrarily small neighborhood of all points on I infinitely often (see).
17. -1 E=E}.
18. D. A. Darling and M. Kac, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 84, 444 (1957). 10.2307/1992825
19. J. Aaronson, J. Anal. Math. 39, 203 (1981). 10.1007/BF02803336
20. f (x) L+1 (μ) means that ∫I f (x) dμ <∞ and f (x) ≥0 on I.
21. 1+α) k zk Γ (1+kα ), where E is the expectation. Note that "normalized" means E ( Yα ) =1.
22. M. Thaler, Isr. J. Math. 46, 67 (1983). 10.1007/BF02760623
23. A positive function U is regularly varying at ∞ with index α if U (tx ) /U (t) → xα, as t→∞ for every x>0.
24. T. Geisel and S. Thomae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1936 (1984). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1936
25. E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 104101 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90. 104101
26. J. Dräger and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5998 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5998
27. This is because the induced transformation defined by S A0 (x) = T A0 τ (x) (x) for x A0 with the return time function τ (x) =min {k≥1: T A0 k (x) A0} is fully chaotic and has a finite invariant measure, where T A0 (x) is the reduced map on [-1/2,1/2 ) in the same way as T1 (x). In particular, x(-1/2,- c2 ) ( c1, c2 ) and x (- c2,- c1 ) ( c2,1/2 ) move to the left cell and to the right cell, respectively, where c2 + (2 c2 ) z =1 (0< c2 <1/2 ).