A mutation that eliminates bundle sheath extensions reduces leaf hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and assimilation rates in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

New Phytologist

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 618-626

  Zsögön, Agustin ^a   Alves Negrini, Ana Clarissa ^b,c   Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira ^a   Nguyen, Hoa Thi ^c   Ball, Marilyn C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bundle sheath extensions (BSE); Introgression; Leaf hydraulics; Micro Tom (MT); Mutant; Near isogenic lines; obscuravenosa (obv); Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

WATER;

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; TOMATO; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; WATER;

EID: 84919876268     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13084     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aoki K, Yano K, Suzuki A, Kawamura S, Sakurai N, Suda K, Kurabayashi A, Suzuki T, Tsugane T, Watanabe M et al. 2010. Large-scale analysis of full-length cDNAs from the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar Micro-Tom, a reference system for the Solanaceae genomics. BMC Genomics 11: 210.
2. Barrios-Masias FH, Chetelat RT, Grulke NE, Jackson LE. 2014. Use of introgression lines to determine the ecophysiological basis for changes in water use efficiency and yield in California processing tomatoes. Functional Plant Biology 41: 119.
3. Bishop GJ, Nomura T, Yokota T, Harrison K, Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Jones JDG, Kamiya Y. 1999. The tomato DWARF enzyme catalyses C-6 oxidation in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 1761-1766.
4. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Jordan GJ. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology 144: 1890-1898.
5. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Sack L. 2010. Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective. Functional Plant Biology 37: 488.
6. Buckley TN, Sack L, Gilbert ME. 2011. The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status. Plant Physiology 156: 962-973.
7. Canny MJ. 1990a. What becomes of the transpiration stream?. New Phytologist 114: 341-368.
8. Canny MJ. 1990b. Fine veins of dicotyledon leaves as sites for enrichment of solutes of the xylem sap. New Phytologist 115: 511-516.
9. Carvalho RF, Campos ML, Pino LE, Crestana SL, Zsögön A, Lima JE, Benedito VA, Peres LE. 2011. Convergence of developmental mutants into a single tomato model system: "Micro-Tom" as an effective toolkit for plant development research. Plant Methods 7: 18.
10. Cochard H, Nardini A, Coll L. 2004. Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance? Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 1257-1267.
11. Giraldo JP, Wheeler JK, Huggett BA, Holbrook NM. 2014. The role of leaf hydraulic conductance dynamics on the timing of leaf senescence. Functional Plant Biology 41: 37.
12. Haberlandt G. 1882. Vergleichende anatomie des assimilatorischen gewebesystems des pflanzens. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 13: 74-188.
13. Hacker J, Neuner G. 2007. Ice propagation in plants visualized at the tissue level by infrared differential thermal analysis (IDTA). Tree Physiology 27: 1661-1670.
14. Jones CM, Rick CM, Adams D, Jernstedt J, Chetelat RT. 2007. Genealogy and fine mapping of obscuravenosa, a gene affecting the distribution of chloroplasts in leaf veins and evidence of selection during breeding of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum; Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 935-947.
15. Karabourniotis G, Bornman JF, Nikolopoulos D. 2000. A possible optical role of the bundle sheath extensions of the heterobaric leaves of Vitis vinifera and Quercus coccifera. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 423-430.
16. Karnovsky MJ. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 27: 137A.
17. Kenzo T, Ichie T, Watanabe Y, Hiromi T. 2007. Ecological distribution of homobaric and heterobaric leaves in tree species of Malaysian lowland tropical rainforest. American Journal of Botany 94: 764-775.
18. 2 diffusion in leaves. New Phytologist 169: 641-643.
19. Liakoura V, Fotelli MN, Rennenberg H, Karabourniotis G. 2009. Should structure-function relations be considered separately for homobaric vs. heterobaric leaves? American Journal of Botany 96: 612-619.
20. Lima JE, Carvalho RF, Neto AT, Figueira A, Peres LEP. 2004. Micro-MsK: a tomato genotype with miniature size, short life cycle, and improved in vitro shoot regeneration. Plant Science 167: 753-757.
21. Lynch DJ, McInerney FA, Kouwenberg LLR, Gonzalez-Meler MA. 2012. Plasticity in bundle sheath extensions of heterobaric leaves. American Journal of Botany 99: 1197-1206.
22. Marti E, Gisbert C, Bishop GJ, Dixon MS, Garcia-Martinez JL. 2006. Genetic and physiological characterization of tomato cv. Micro-Tom. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 2037-2047.
23. McClendon JH. 1992. Photographic survey of the occurrence of bundle-sheath extensions in deciduous dicots. Plant Physiology 99: 1677-1679.
24. Meissner R, Jacobson Y, Melamed S, Levyatuv S, Shalev G, Ashri A, Elkind Y, Levy A. 1997. A new model system for tomato genetics. Plant Journal 12: 1465-1472.
25. Morgan J, Lecain D, Wells R. 1990. Semidwarfing genes concentrate photosynthetic machinery and affect leaf gas exchange of wheat. Crop Science 30: 602-608.
26. Nardini A, Salleo S, Andri S. 2005. Circadian regulation of leaf hydraulic conductance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv Margot). Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 750-759.
27. Neger F. 1918. Wegsamkeit der laubblätter für gase. Flora 111: 152-161.
28. Nikolopoulos D, Liakopoulos G, Drossopoulos I, Karabourniotis G. 2002. The relationship between anatomy and photosynthetic performance of heterobaric leaves. Plant Physiology 129: 235-243.
29. Okabe Y, Asamizu E, Saito T, Matsukura C, Ariizumi T, Brès C, Rothan C, Mizoguchi T, Ezura H. 2011. Tomato TILLING technology: development of a reverse genetics tool for the efficient isolation of mutants from Micro-Tom mutant libraries. Plant & Cell Physiology 52: 1994-2005.
30. Pieruschka R, Chavarría-Krauser A, Schurr U, Jahnke S. 2010. Photosynthesis in lightfleck areas of homobaric and heterobaric leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 1031-1039.
31. Pino-Nunes LE, Figueira AV de O, Tulmann Neto A, Zsögön A, Piotto FA, Silva JA, Bernardi WF, Peres LEP. 2009. Induced mutagenesis and natural genetic variation in tomato "Micro-Tom". Acta Horticulturae 821: 63-72.
32. Read J, Stokes A. 2006. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. American Journal of Botany 93: 1546-1565.
33. Rick CM, Gifford EM, Chetelat RT. 1996. Genetics, anatomy and genealogy of obscuravenosa, a monogenic tomato leaf trait. Berkeley, CA, USA: Molecular Biology of Tomato Symposium UC Berkeley.
34. Sack L, Holbrook NM. 2006. Leaf Hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 361-381.
35. Sack L, Scoffoni C. 2013. Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. New Phytologist 198: 983-1000.
36. Sack L, Streeter CM, Holbrook NM. 2004. Hydraulic analysis of water flow through leaves of sugar maple and red oak. Plant Physiology 134: 1824-1833.
37. Saito T, Ariizumi T, Okabe Y, Asamizu E, Hiwasa-Tanase K, Fukuda N, Mizoguchi T, Yamazaki Y, Aoki K, Ezura H. 2011. TOMATOMA: a novel tomato mutant database distributing Micro-Tom mutant collections. Plant & Cell Physiology 52: 283-296.
38. Sakai WS. 1973. Simple method for differential staining of parafilm embedded plant material using toluidine blue 01. Stain Technology 48: 247-249.
39. Scoffoni C, Pou A, Aasamaa K, Sack L. 2008. The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: new evidence from two experimental methods. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 1803-1812.
40. Scoffoni C, Sack L, PrometheusWiki Contributors. 2013. Quantifying leaf vein traits PrometheusWiki. [WWW Document] URL http://prometheuswiki.publish.csiro.au/tiki-index.php?page=Quantifying+leaf+vein+traits [accessed 8 June 2014].
41. Solereder R, Boodle LA, Fritsch FE. 1899. Systematische anatomie der dicotyledon. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
42. Sommerville KE, Sack L, Ball MC. 2012. Hydraulic conductance of Acacia phyllodes (foliage) is driven by primary nerve (vein) conductance and density. Plant, Cell & Environment 35: 158-168.
43. Stam P, Zeven AC. 1981. The theoretical proportion of the donor genome in near-isogenic lines of self-fertilizers bred by backcrossing. Euphytica 30: 227-238.
44. Tanaka Y, Shiraiwa T. 2009. Stem growth habit affects leaf morphology and gas exchange traits in soybean. Annals of Botany 104: 1293-1299.
45. Terashima I. 1992. Anatomy of nonuniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31: 195-212.
46. Watanabe S, Mizoguchi T, Aoki K, Kubo Y, Mori H, Imanishi S, Yamazaki Y, Shibata D, Ezura H. 2007. Ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom for large-scale mutant screens. Plant Biotechnology 24: 33-38.
47. Westermaier RE. 1884. Über bau und funktion des pflanzlichen hautgewebesystems. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 14: 43-81.
48. Wylie RB. 1952. The bundle sheath extension in leaves of dicotyledons. American Journal of Botany 39: 645-651.
49. Zwieniecki MA, Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2007. Hydraulic design of leaves: insights from rehydration kinetics. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 910-921.