Plasticity in bundle sheath extensions of heterobaric leaves

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1197-1206

  Lynch, Douglas J ^a,b,c   Mcinerney, Francesca A ^a   Kouwenberg, Lenny L R ^d,e   Gonzalez Meler, Miquel A ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acer saccharum; Bulk 13C; Bundle sheath extension; Heterobaric; Liquidambar styraciflua; Plasticity; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

CARBON; RAIN;

ADAPTATION; CANOPY; CARBON ISOTOPE; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; IRRADIANCE; LEAF; LIFE HISTORY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

ACER; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; LIGHT; LIQUIDAMBAR; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; VASCULAR BUNDLE (PLANT);

ACER; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CARBON ISOTOPES; LIGHT; LIQUIDAMBAR; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT VASCULAR BUNDLE; RAIN;

ACER; ACER SACCHARUM; LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA; PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 84863869255     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100525     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Blonder, B., C. Violle, L. P. Bentley, and B. J. Enquist. 2011. Venation networks and the origin of the leaf economics spectrum. Ecology Letters 14: 91-100.
2. Brodribb, T. J., and T. S. Feild. 2010. Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification. Ecology Letters 13: 175-183.
3. Brodribb, T. J., T. S. Feild, and L. Sack. 2010. Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective. Functional Plant Biology 37: 488-498.
4. Buckley, T. N., L. Sack, and M. E. Gilbert. 2011. The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status. Plant Physiology 156: 962-973.
5. Chapin, F. S. III, P. A. Matson, and H. A. Mooney. 2002. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
6. Damesin, C., C. Barbaroux, D. Berveiller, C. Lelarge, M. Chaves, C. Maguas, R. Maia, and J. Y. Pontailler. 2005. The carbon isotope composition of CO 2 respired by trunks: Comparison of four sampling methods. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 19: 369-374.
7. Dawson, T., S. Mambelli, A. Plamboeck, P. Templer, and K. Tu. 2002. Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 507-559.
8. Ellis, B., D. C. Douglas, L. J. Hickey, K. R. Johnson, J. D. Mitchell, P. Wilf, and S. L. Wing. 2009. Manual of leaf architecture. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 190 pp.
9. Esau, K. 1953. Plant anatomy. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
10. Farquhar, G. D., J. R. Ehleringer, and K. T. Hubick. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503-537.
11. Farquhar, G. D., M. H. O'Leary, and J. A. Berry. 1982. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9: 121-137.
12. Fichot, R., F. Laurans, R. Monclus, A. Moreau, G. Pilate, and F. Brignolas. 2009. Xylem anatomy correlates with gas exchange, water-use efficiency and growth performance under contrasting water regimes: Evidence from Populus deltoides × Populus nigra hybrids. Tree Physiology 29: 1537-1549.
13. Flexas, J., M. Ribas-Carbó, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Galmés, and H. Medrano. 2008. Mesophyll conductance to CO2: Current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 602-612.
14. Garten, C. T., and G. E. Taylor Jr. 1992. Foliar δ 13 C within a temperate deciduous forest: Spatial, temporal, and species sources of variation. Oecologia 90: 1-7.
15. Gonzalez-Meler, M. A., and L. Taneva. 2005. Integrated effects of atmospheric CO 2 concentration on plant and ecosystem respiration. In H. Lambers and M. Ribas-Carbo[(eds.], Plant respiration, 211-259. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
16. Kenzo, T., T. Ichie, Y. Watanabe, and T. Hiromi. 2007. Ecological distribution of homobaric and heterobaric leaves in tree species of Malaysian lowland tropical rainforest. American Journal of Botany 94: 764-775.
17. Kjelgren, R. K., and J. R. Clark. 1992. Photosynthesis and leaf morphology of Liquidambar styraciflua L. under variable urban radiant energy conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology 36: 165-171.
18. Lavorel, S., K. Grigulis, P. Lamarque, M. Colace, D. Garden, J. Girel, G. Pillet, and R. Douzet. 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99: 135-147.
19. Lawson, T., and J. Morison. 2006. Visualising patterns of CO 2 diffusion in leaves. New Phytologist 169: 641-643.
20. Leegood, R. C. 2008. Roles of the bundle sheath cells in leaves of C 3 plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 1663-1673.
21. Le Roux, X., T. Bariac, H. Sinoquet, B. Genty, C. Piel, A. Mariotti, C. Girardin, and P. Richard. 2001. Spatial distribution of leaf wateruse efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination within an isolated tree crown. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 1021-1023.
22. Lockheart, M. J., P. F. Van Bergen, and R. P. Evershed. 1997. Variations in the stable carbon isotope compositions of individual lipids from the leaves of modern angiosperms: Implications for the study of higher land plant-derived sedimentary organic matter. Organic Geochemistry 26: 137-153.
23. Moorcroft, P. R., G. C. Hurtt, and S. W. Pacala. 2001. A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: The ecosystem demography model (ED). Ecological Monographs 71: 557-585.
24. Moore, D. J. P., M. A. Gonzalez-Meler, L. Taneva, J. S. Pippen, H. S. Kim, and E. H. DeLucia. 2008. The effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on apparent stem respiration from Pinus taeda L. is confounded by high levels of soil carbon dioxide. Oecologia 158: 1-10.
25. Morison, J., and T. Lawson. 2007. Does lateral gas diffusion in leaves matter? Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 1072-1085.
26. Morison, J., T. Lawson, and G. Cornic. 2007. Lateral CO 2 diffusion inside dicotyledonous leaves can be substantial: Quantification in different light intensities. Plant Physiology 145: 680-690.
27. Niinemets, U. 2001. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dray mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82: 453-469.
28. Niklas, K. J. 1997. Adaptive walks through fitness landscapes for early vascular land plants. American Journal of Botany 84: 16-25.
29. Nikolopoulos, D., G. Liakopoulos, I. Drossopoulus, and G. Karabourniotis. 2002. The relationship between anatomy and photosynthetic performance of heterobaric leaves. Plant Physiology 129: 235-243.
30. Pieruschka, R., A. Chavarria-Krauser, K. Cloos, H. S charr, U. Schurr, and S. Jahnke. 2008. Photosynthesis can be enhanced by lateral CO 2 diffusion inside leaves over distances of several millimeters. New Phytologist 178: 335-347.
31. Pieruschka, R., U. Schurr, and S. Jahnke. 2005. Lateral gas diffusion inside leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 857-864.
32. Pieruschka, R., U. Schurr, M. Jensen, W. Wolff, and S. Jahnke. 2006. Lateral diffusion of CO 2 from shaded to illuminated leaf parts affects photosynthesis inside homobaric leaves. New Phytologist 169: 779-788.
33. Poorter, L., and F. Bongers. 2006. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87: 1733-1743.
34. PRISM Climate Group. 2009. PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University, website http://www.prismclimate.org, created 4 Feb 2004, [accessed 1 April 2009].
35. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, website http://www.R-project. org.
36. Rasband, W. S. 1997-2008. ImageJ [computer program]. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, website http://rsb. info.nih.gov/ij/.
37. Roth-Nebelsick, A., D. Uhl, V. Mosbrugger, and H. Kerp. 2001. Evolution and function of leaf venation architecture: A review. Annals of Botany 87: 553-566.
38. Sack, L., P. D. Cowan, N. Jaikumar, and N. M. Holbrook. 2003. The 'hydrology' of leaves: Co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1343-1356.
39. Saurer, M., R. Siegwolf, and F. Schweingruber. 2004. Carbon isotope discrimination indicates improving water-use efficiency of trees in northern Eurasia over the last 100 years. Global Change Biology 10: 2109-2120.
40. Seibt, U., A. Rajabi, H. Griffiths, and J. Berry. 2008. Carbon isotopes and water use efficiency: Sense and sensitivity. Oecologia 155: 441-454.
41. Terashima, I. 1992. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31: 195-212.
42. Terashima, I., Y. T. Hanba, D. Tholen, and Ü. Niiemets. 2011. Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 155: 108-116.
43. Teskey, R. O., A. Saveyn, K. Steppe, and M. A. McGuire. 2008. Origin, fate and significance of CO 2 in tree stems. New Phytologist 177: 17-32.
44. Uhl, D., and V. Mosbrugger. 1999. Leaf venation density as a climate and environmental proxy: A critical review and new data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149: 15-26.
45. White, P. S. 1983. Corner's rules in eastern deciduous trees: Allometry and its implications for the adaptive architecture of trees. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 110: 203-212.
46. Wylie, R. B. 1951. Principles of foliar organization shown by sun-shade leaves from ten species of deciduous dicotyledonous trees. American Journal of Botany 38: 355-361.
47. Wylie, R. B. 1952. The bundle sheath extension in leaves of dicotyledons. American Journal of Botany 39: 645-651.
48. Zimmerman, J. K., and J. R. Ehleringer. 1990. Carbon isotope ratios are correlated with irradiance levels in the Panamanian orchid Catasetum viridiflavum. Oecologia 83: 247-249.
49. Zwieniecki, M. A., C. K. Boyce, and N. M. Holbrook. 2004. Hydraulic limitations imposed by crown placement determine final size and shape of Quercus rubra L. leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 357-365.