Smart meter communication standards in Europe - A comparison

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 1249-1262

  Erlinghagen, Sabine ^a   Lichtensteiger, Bill ^b   Markard, Jochen ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b IEEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication technology; Smart meter; Standards

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; SMART POWER GRIDS;

COMMUNICATIONS STANDARD; COMMUNICATIONTECHNOLOGY; COMPLEX TASK; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY; SMART GRID; SMART METERING; TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS; WIRED AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION STANDARDS;

SMART METERS;

EID: 84919808044     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.065     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. H. Farhangi The path of the Smart Grid IEEE Power Energy Mag 8 2010 18 28
2. A. Faruqui, D. Harris, and R. Hledik Unlocking the [euro] 53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: how increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU's smart grid investment Energy Policy 38 2010 6222 6231
3. P. Fox-Penner Smart power: climate change, the smart grid, and the future of electric utilities 2010 Island Press Washington, Covelo, London
4. Rohjans S, Uslar M, Bleiker R, Gonzalez J, Specht M, Suding T, et al. Survey of smart grid standardization studies and recommendations. In: IEEE international conference on smart grid communications 2010, IEEE; 2010. p. 583-588
5. E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno, and M. Conti The role of communication systems in smart grids: architectures, technical solutions and research challenges Comput Commun 36 2013 1665 1697
6. OECD/IEA. Smart Grid Technology Roadmap; 2011.
7. V.C. Güngör, D. Sahin, T. Kocak, S. Ergüt, C. Buccella, and S. Member Smart grid technologies: communication technologies and standards IEEE Trans Ind Inform 7 2011 529 539
8. S. Jain Pragmatic agency in technology standards setting: the case of ethernet Res Policy 41 2012 1643 1654
9. R. Garud, S. Jain, and A. Kumaraswamy Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java Acad Manag J 45 2002 196 214
10. Erlinghagen S, Markard J. Technology users as game changers: standardization strategies in the field of smart meter technology. In: proceedings of the 5th international conference on sustainability transitions (IST), UTR University; 2014.
11. J. West. How open is open enough? Res Policy 32 2003 1259 1285
12. J.L. Funk, and D.T. Methe Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication Res Policy 30 2001 589 610
13. M.A. Cusumano, Y. Mylonadis, and R.S. Rosenbloom Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta Bus Hist Rev 66 1992 51 94
14. J. van den Ende, G. van de Kaa, S. den Uijl, and H.J. deVries The Paradox of Standard Flexibility: The Effects of Co-evolution between Standard and Interorganizational Network Organ Stud 33 2012 705 736
15. J. Markard, R. Raven, and B. Truffer Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects Res Policy 41 2012 955 967
16. Atayero AA, Alatishe AA, Ivanov YA. Power line communication technologies: modeling and simulation of PRIME physical layer. In: proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science 2012, vol. II, San Francisco, USA; 2012.
17. Buayairaksa S, Thepphaeng S, Pirak C. On the performance of G3 power line communication network with smart energy meter. In: proceedings of the international conference on electrical engineering/electronics,computer, telecommunications and information technology, IEEE; 2013. p. 1-5.
18. Berganza I, Sendin A, Arzuaga A, Sharma M, Varadarajan B. PRIME on-field deployment - first summary of results and discussion. Getting practical: field trials, deployments, and lessons learnt (IEEE SmartGridComm), IEEE; 2011, p. 297-302.
19. Tan RHG, Lee CH, Mok VH. Automatic power meter reading system using GSM network. In: proceedings of the international power engineering conference, IPEC 2007. 07. p. 465-9.
20. Fan Z, Haines RJ, Kulkarni P. M2M Communications for E-Health and Smart Grid: An Industry and Standard Perspective; 2013.
21. T. Khalifa, K. Naik, and A. Nayak A survey of communication protocols for automatic meter reading applications IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 13 2011 168 182
22. Rohjans S, Uslar M, Juergen Appelrath JH. OPC UA and CIM: semantics for the smart grid. In: transmission and distribution conference and exposition, 2010 IEEE PES, IEEE; 2010, p. 1-8.
23. Feuerhahn S, Zillgith M, Wittwer C, Wietfeld C. Comparison of the communication protocols DLMS/COSEM, SML and IEC 61850 for smart metering applications. In: proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, IEEE; 2011. p. 410-5.
24. SSSR Depuru, L. Wang, and V. Devabhaktuni Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and status Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15 2011 2736 2742
25. R. Ma, H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Meng, and S. Member Smart grid communication: its challenges and opportunities IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4 2013 36 46
26. A. Usman, and S.H. Shami Evolution of communication technologies for smart grid applications Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19 2013 191 199
27. S.S.S.R. Depuru, L. Wang, and V. Devabhaktuni Electricity theft: overview, issues, prevention and a smart meter based approach to control theft Energy Policy 39 2011 1007 1015
28. T. Hargreaves, M. Nye, and J. Burgess Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors Energy Policy 38 2010 6111 6119
29. S. Darby The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption 2006 University of Oxford Oxford, UK
30. Z. Fan, P. Kulkarni, S. Gormus, C. Efthymiou, G. Kalogridis, and M. Sooriyabandara Smart grid communications: overview of research activities IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15 2013 21 38
31. Berezak-Lazarus N. Smart grid enabled and enhanced by broadband powerline strategic value and inherent technical characteristics of broadband powerline. In: proceedings of the third international conference on smart grids, communications and it energy-aware technologies, ENERGY 2013; 2013. p. 77-82.
32. N. Brunsson, A. Rasche, and D. Seidl The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies Organ Stud 33 2012 613 632
33. Giordano, V, Meletiou, A, Covrig, CF, Mengolini, A, Ardelean, M, Fulli, G, et al. Smart Grid projects in Europe: lessons learned and current developments 2012 update; 2013.
34. S. Erlinghagen, and J. Markard Smart grids and the transformation of the electricity sector: ICT firms as potential catalysts for sectoral change Energy Policy 51 2012 895 906
35. G. Van de Kaa, J. van den Ende, H.J. de Vries, and E. van Heck Factors for winning interface format battles: a review and synthesis of the literature Technol Forecast Soc Change 78 2011 1397 1411
36. J.L. Funk, and D.T. Methe Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication Res Policy 30 2001 589 610
37. J. West The economic realities of open standards: black, white, and many shades of gray V. Stango, Stand. Public Policy, Cambride 2007 Cambridge University Press MA 87 122
38. K. Blind, and N. Thumm Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications Res Policy 33 2004 1583 1598
39. A.E. Leiponen Competing through cooperation: the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications Manag Sci 54 2008 1904 1919
40. Sum C, Kojima F, Harada H. Coexistence of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Systems for IEEE 802.15.4g Smart Utility Networks. In: proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks coexistence; 2011. p. 510-20.
41. C.-S. Sum, H. Harada, F. Kojima, Z. Lan, and R. Funada Smart utility networks in TV white space IEEE Commun Mag 49 2011 132 139
42. B. Lichtensteiger, B. Bjelajac, C. Müller, C.R.F. Wietfeld. Mesh systems for smart metering: system architecture and performance. In: proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on smart grid communications; 2010. p. 379-84.
43. X. Costa-Perez, A. Festag, H. Kolbe, J. Quittek, S. Schmid, and M. Stiemerling Latest trends in telecommunication standards ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 43 2013 64 71
44. A. Bergek, S. Jacobsson, and B. Sandén Legitimation and development of positive externalities: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems Technol Anal Strateg Manag 20 2008 575 592
45. F.F. Suarez Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework Res Policy 33 2004 271 286
46. J. Farla, J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources Technol Forecast Soc Change 79 2012 991 998
47. M.M. Smink, M.P. Hekkert, and S.O. Negro Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents' institutional strategies Bus Strateg Environ 2013
48. K. Lyytinen, and V.V. Fomin Achieving high momentum in the evolution of wireless infrastructures: the battle over the 1G solutions Telecomm Policy 26 2002 149 170
49. J. Van den Ende, G. van de Kaa, S. den Uijl, and H.J. de Vries The paradox of standard flexibility: the effects of co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network Organ Stud 33 2012 705 736
50. S. Strunz The German energy transition as a regime shift Ecol Econ 100 2014 150 158
51. B.D. Solomon, and K. Krishna The coming sustainable energy transition: history, strategies, and outlook Energy Policy 39 2011 7422 7431
52. F.W. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms Environ Innov Soc Transit 1 2011 24 40
53. IEEE Standards Association. IEEE Standard for Low-Frequency (less than 500 kHz) Narrowband Power Line Communications for Smart Grid Applications, New York; 2013.
54. ETSI. ETSI TR 102 649-2 v.1.2.1; 2010.