What does US$1.1 billion buy? An investment in the future

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 561-563

  Simpson, Lisa A ^a  

^a ACADEMYHEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

academic; CER; funding; impact; incentives; policy; research infrastructure; workforce

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; INVESTMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FORECASTING; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; SCIENCE; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; FORECASTING; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84919787573     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.74     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. National Academies of Science. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA (2007
2. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2007). www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html
3. ResearchAmerica. America Speaks: poll data summary, Volume 10 (2009). www.researchamerica.org/uploads/AmericaSpeaksV10.pdf
4. Wilensky GR. The policies and politics of creating a comparative clinical effectiveness research center. Health Aff. 28(4), w719-w729 (2009
5. Orszag P. Time to act on health care costs. Issues in Science and Technology. 27 November 2013. http://issues.org/24-23/orszag
6. Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA (2009
7. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research-implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 328-330 (2009
8. Esposito D, Yong P, Rich E, Geonnotti K, Kimmey L. The ARRA investment in CER: a description of the midstream evaluation and how the funds were allocated and CER priorities addressed. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 3(6), 581-589 (2014
9. Forrest C, Simpson L, Clancy C. Child health services research: challenges and opportunities. JAMA 277(22), 1787-1793 (1997
10. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Oxford University Press, UK (2012
11. A National Research Agenda for Public Health Services and Systems. Am. J. Prev. Med. 42(5S1), S72-S78 (2012). www.rwjf.org
12. Halfon N, Schuster M, Valentine W, McGlynn E. Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference. Health Serv. Res. 33(4 Pt 2), 955-976 (1998
13. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Baumann AA, et al. The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States. Implement. Sci. 8, 105 (2013
14. Hanson TA Scientific communities of practice for learning-lessons from ethnographic fieldwork. www.academia.edu
15. Holve E, Segal C, Rein A, Hamilton Lopez M, Johnson B. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Med. Care 50, S7-S10 (2012
16. Wilcox A, Randhawa G, Embi P, Cao H, Kuperman G. Sustainability Considerations for Health Research and Analytic Data Infrastructures. eGEMs 2(2), doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1113 (2014
17. The International School on Research Impact Assessment. www.theinternationalschoolonria.com
18. Guthrie S, Wamae W, Diepeveen S, Wooding S, Grant J. Measuring Research: A Guide to Research Evaluation Frameworks and Tools. Prepared for the Association of American Medical Colleges. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs
19. American Society for Cell Biology. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. http://am.ascb.org/dora
20. Bladek M. DORA: San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. C & R L News April: 191-196. http://crln.acrl.org/content/75/4/191.full.pdf+html
21. Priem J. Scholarship: Beyond the paper. Nature 495(7442), 437-440 (2013
22. AcademyHealth. AHRQ: 15 Years of transforming care and improving health (2014). www.academyhealth.org/files/AHRQReport2014.pdf
23. Research Excellence Framework. Decisions on assessing research impact (2011). www.ref.ac.uk.
24. Alivisatos P, Isaacs ED, Mason T. The sequester is going to devastate U.S. science research for decades. The Atlantic, March 2013. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/
25. Stein S. The Next Frontier In The War Over Science. Huffington Post, 6 May 2014. www.huffingtonpost.com
26. Inside Health Policy. House republicans say increased NIH, FDA funding off table for medical innovation bill. 10 September 2014. http://insidehealthpolicy.com