The ARRA investment in CER: A description of the midstream evaluation and how the funds were allocated and CER priorities addressed

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 581-589

  Esposito, Dominick ^a   Yong, Pierre L ^b   Rich, Eugene ^a   Geonnotti, Kristin ^a   Kimmey, Laura D ^a  

^a MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative effectiveness research; data infrastructure; dissemination and translation; evaluation; human and scientific capital; priority conditions; priority interventions; priority populations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LAW; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; POPULATION RESEARCH; PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH PRIORITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ECONOMICS; GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 84919782752     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.55     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Institute of Medicine. Executive summary. In: Learning What Works Best: The Nation's Need for Comparative Effectiveness in Health Care. IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine, Washington, DC, USA (2007
2. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and the Congress. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA (2009
3. Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2009
4. AHRQ priority populations. www.ahrq.gov/populations
5. Atlas.ti. http://atlasti.com
6. Collins FS. Meeting the translational challenge. Presented at: National Health Council 24th Annual Voluntary Health Leadership Council. Washington, DC, USA (2011
7. Public comment draft of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee presented on July 23 2012, and revised thereafter. http://pcori.org/assets/MethodologyReport-Comment.pdf
8. Dreyer NA, Tunis SR, Berger M, Ollendorf D, Mattox P, Gliklich R. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff. (Millwood) 29(10), 1818-1825 (2010
9. Armstrong K. Methods in comparative effectiveness research. J. Clin. Oncol. 30(34), 4208-4214 (2012).
10. Ryan P. Statistical challenges in systematic evidence generation through analysis of observational healthcare data networks. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 22(1), 3-6 (2013