Expectations About the Temporal Structure of the World Result in the Attentional Blink and Repetition Blindness

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 929-934

  Rieth, Cory A ^a   Vul, Edward ^a  

^a Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Attentional blink; Bayesian Models; Computational Modeling; Repetition blindness

Indexed keywords

EYE PROTECTION;

ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINKS; BAYESIAN MODELLING; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; NATURAL WORLD; RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATIONS; REPETITION BLINDNESS; TASK RELEVANT; TEMPORAL STRUCTURES; VARYING DELAY;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84919736004     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bowman, H., & Wyble, B. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 38-70.
2. Chun, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 738-755.
3. Doucet, A., Freitas, N. D., & Murphy, K. (2000). Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 176-183.
4. Fiser, J., Berkes, P., Orbn, G., & Lengyel, M. (2010). Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 119-130.
5. Huber, D. E. (2008). Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 324-347.
6. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition Blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27(2), 117-143.
7. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: levels of processing. Journal of experimental psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30-47.
8. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. New York: Freeman.
9. Moreno-Bote, R., Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2011). Bayesian sampling in visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(30), 12491-12496.
10. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Hooge, I. T. C. (2005). Delayed Attentional Engagement in the Attentional Blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1463-1475.
11. Nieuwenstein, M. R., & Potter, M. C. (2006). Temporal Limits of Selection and Memory Encoding A Comparison of Whole Versus Partial Report in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Psychological Science, 17(6), 471-475.
12. Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115(4), 836-863.
13. Olivers, C. N. L., van der Stigchel, S., & Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 71(2), 126-139.
14. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes, 32, 531-556.
15. Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257-286.
16. Raymond, J., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860.
17. Rieth, C. A. (2012). Adaptations of temporal dynamics: Faces, places, and words. Doctoral dissertation, UCSD
18. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J., & Arnell, K. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(8), 291-296.
19. Sergent, C., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Is Consciousness a Gradual Phenomenon? Evidence for an All-or-None Bifurcation During the Attentional Blink. Psychological Science, 15(11), 720-728.
20. Shapiro, K., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types. Psychological Science, 8(2), 95-100.
21. Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2008). Measuring the Crowd Within. Psychological Science, 19(7), 645-647.
22. Vul, E., & Rich, A. N. (2010). Independent sampling of features enables conscious perception of bound objects. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1168-1175.
23. Vul, E., Hanus, D., & Kanwisher, N. (2009). Attention as inference: Selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 546-560.
24. Vul, E., Nieuwenstein, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 19(1), 55-61.
25. Wang, H., Freeman, J., Merriam, E., Hasson, U., & Heeger, D. J. (2012). Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing. Journal of Vision, 12, 1-27.
26. Weichselgartner, E. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238(4828), 778-780.
27. Wyble, B., & Bowman, H. (2005). Computational and experimental evaluation of the attentional blink: Testing the simultaneous type serial token model. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2371-2376.
28. Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 787-807.
29. Wyble, B., Potter, M. C., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2011). Attentional episodes in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140(3), 488-505.