Moral Bases of Public Distrust

Restoring Trust in Organizations and Leaders: Enduring Challenges and Emerging Answers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Janoff Bulman, Ronnie ^a   Parker, Michael T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Distrust; Ingroup; Morality; Outgroup; Partisanship; Politics; Threat; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919680225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756087.003.0002     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Black, G. S., & Black, B. D. (1994). The politics of American discontent. New York: John Wiley.
2. Blow, C. M. (2009, Aug. 22). Masters and slaves of deception. The New York Times, p. A15.
3. Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
4. Braithwaite, V. (1997). Harmony and security value orientations in political evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 401-414.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 214-231). New York: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brooks, D. (2010, Feb. 23). Into the mire. The New York Times, p. A23.
7. Burns, A. (2008, Nov. 18). Report: Democrats should rebuild trust. Politico. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15734.html
8. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
9. Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1559-1572.
10. Darley, J. M. (2004). Commitment, trust and worker effort expenditure in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations (Vol. 7, pp. 127-151). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Darman, R. (1996). Who's in control: Polar politics and the sensible center. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12. De Waal, F. (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Dionne, E. J., Jr. (1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
14. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113.
15. Fiorina, M. P. (1999). The dark side of civic engagement. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 395-425). Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
16. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.
17. Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20, 393-403.
18. Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 517-523.
19. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
20. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002.
21. Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65-72.
22. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, Fall, 55-66.
23. Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E., & Hom, H. (2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like the other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1-36.
24. Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (Vol. 2, pp. 3-39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26. Harwood, J. (2010, March 1). Partisanship's influence on health bill's future. The New York Times, p. A18.
27. Hibbing, J. R., & Smith, J. T. (2004). Is it the middle that is frustrated? Americans' ideological positions and government trust. American Politics Research, 32, 652.
28. Hornberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963-976.
29. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don't pander. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
30. Janoff-Bulman, R. (2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120-128.
31. Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Baldacci, K. G. (2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1091-1099.
32. Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 521-537.
33. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
34. Jost, T. J., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
35. Kant, I. (1964/1785). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Translated by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row.
36. Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. King, D. C. (1997). The polarization of American parties and mistrust of government. In J. S. Nye, Jr., P. D. Zelikow, & D. C. King (Eds.), Why people don't trust government (pp. 155-178). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: Vol. I. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
39. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
40. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Paranoid cognition ion social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 251-275.
41. Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. S., & Hanna, B. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: the decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers in Theory and Research (pp. 357-389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Kramer, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (1998). Getting by with a little help from our enemies: Collective paranoia and its role in intergroup relations. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Krebs, D. L. (2008). Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 149-172.
44. Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86-107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Messick, D. M., & Kramer, R. M. (2001). Trust as a shallow form of morality. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (Vol. 2, pp. 89-118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
48. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
49. Mullen, E., & Skitka, L. J. (2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 629-643.
50. Myers, D. G. (1982). Polarizing effects of social interaction. In H. Bandstatter, J. H. David, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision-making (pp. 125-161). New York: Academic Press.
51. Myers, D. G., & Bishop, G. D. (1970). Discussion effects on racial attitudes. Science, 169, 778-789.
52. Oreskes, M. (1989, July 2). Civil rights act leaves deep mark on the American political landscape. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/02/us/civil-rights-act-leaves-deep-mark-on-theamerican-political-landscape.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
53. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalero, M., Hatemi, P. K., & Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667-1670.
54. Parker, M. T. & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2011). Lessons From Morality-Based Social Identity: The Power of Outgroup "Hate," Not Just Ingroup "Love". Manuscript submitted for publication.
55. Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
56. Rock, M., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010). Where do we draw our lines? Politics, rigidity, and the role of self-regulation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 26-33.
57. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
58. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis:A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574-586.
59. Schlesinger, J. (2001). Trust and the public service. First Annual Elliot Richardson Lecture, presented at the Meeting of the American Society for Public Administrators and National Academy of Public Administration, Rutgers University, March 11.
60. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-169). New York: Routledge.
61. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
62. Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14, 305-326.
63. Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world context: A test of the value-protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419-1429.
64. Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B., (2002). Dispositions, scripts or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470-487.
65. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: how like minds untie and divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
67. Terry, L. D. (1997). Trustworthy government: leadership and management strategies for building trust and high performance. Public Administration Review, Sept. 1.
68. The Democratic left: Disappointed, down, despondent. (2010, Aug. 12). The Economist, 23-24.
69. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.