Understanding party identification: A social identity approach

Political Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 393-403

  Greene, Steven ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Party identification; Social identity theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033137484     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00150     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abrams, D. (1994). Political distinctiveness: An identity optimizing approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 357-365.
2. Abrams, D., & Emler, N. (1992). Self-denial as a paradox of political and regional social identity: Findings from a study of 16-and 18-year-olds. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 279-295.
3. Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. D. (in press). Group distinctiveness, social identity, and collective mobilization. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Duck, J., Hogg, M., & Terry, D. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215.
6. Green, D., & Citrin, J. (1994). Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgments opposite? American Journal of Political Science, 38, 256-281.
7. Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
8. Keith, B., Magleby, D., Nelson, C., Orr, E., Westyle, M., & Wolfinger, R. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Kelly, C. (1988). Intergroup differentiation in a political context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 319-332.
10. Kelly, C. (1989). Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 239-250.
11. Kelly, C. (1990a). Social identity and intergroup perceptions in minority-majority contexts. Human Relations, 43, 583-599.
12. Kelly, C. (1990b). Social identity and levels of influence: When a political minority fails. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 289-301.
13. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
14. Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 813-824.
15. Niemi, R., & Weisberg, H. (1993). Controversies in voting behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
16. Petrocik, J. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology, 1, 31-47.
17. Stanga, J., & Sheffield, J. (1987). The myth of zero partisanship: Attitudes towards American political parties, 1964-1984. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 829-855.
18. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 27-60). London: Academic Press.
19. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
20. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
21. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.
22. Wattenberg, M. P. (1996). The decline of American political parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Weisberg, H. F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2, 33-60.
24. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.