Keratin films for ocular surface reconstruction: Evaluation of biocompatibility in an in-vivo model

Biomaterials

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 112-120

  Borrelli, Maria ^a   Joepen, Nadine ^a   Reichl, Stephan ^b   Finis, David ^a   Schoppe, Martin ^a   Geerling, Gerd ^a   Schrader, Stefan ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Cornea; Keratin films; Ocular surface

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; DEGRADATION; HISTOLOGY; LIPIDS; PATHOLOGY; SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; TRANSPARENCY;

ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS; AMNIOTIC MEMBRANES; CORNEA; CORNEAL BIOCOMPATIBILITY; DEGRADATION RATE; NEW ZEALAND WHITE RABBIT; RABBIT MODELS; TISSUE INTEGRATION;

KERATIN;

DEXAMETHASONE; KERATIN; OFLOXACIN; STEROID; BIOMATERIAL;

AMNION; AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE TRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA NEOVASCULARIZATION; CORNEA OPACITY; DEGRADATION; DISSECTION; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; KERATIN FILM; KERATITIS; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; NONHUMAN; OCULAR SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL IMPLANT; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RABBIT MODEL; STEROID THERAPY; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; DRUG EFFECTS; EYE; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOLOGY; RABBIT; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

AMNION; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DISSECTION; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INFLAMMATION; KERATINS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; RABBITS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84919634892     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Tseng S.C. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Biosci Rep 2001, 21:481-489.
2. Feng Y., Borrelli M., Reichl S., Schrader S., Geerling G. Review of alternative carrier materials for ocular surface reconstruction. Curr Eye Res 2014, 39:541-552.
3. Gomes J.A., Romano A., Santos M.S., Dua H.S. Amniotic membrane use in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005, 16:233-240.
4. Arora R., Mehta D., Jain V. Amniotic membrane transplantation in acute chemical burns. Eye 2005, 19:273-278.
5. Koizumi N., Inatomi T., Suzuki T., Sotozono C., Kinoshita S. Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 2001, 108:1569-1574.
6. Nakamura T., Inatomi T., Sotozono C., Amemiya T., Kanamura N., Kinoshita S. Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88:1280-1284.
7. Dua H.S., Rahman I., Miri A., Said D.G. Variations in amniotic membrane: relevance for clinical applications. Br J Ophthalmol 2010, 94:963-964.
8. Hopkinson A., McIntosh R.S., Tighe P.J., James D.K., Dua H.S. Amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction: donor variations and the effect of handling on TGF-beta contents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47:4316-4322.
9. Connon C.J., Doutch J., Chen B., Hopkinson A., Mehta J.S., Nakamura T., et al. The variation in transparency of amniotic membrane used in ocular surface regeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2010, 94:1057-1061.
10. Jang I.K., Ahn J.I., Shin J.S., Kwon Y.S., Ryu Y.H., Lee J.K., et al. Transplantation of reconstructed corneal layer composed of corneal epithelium and fibroblasts on a lyophilized amniotic membrane to severely alkali-burned cornea. Artif Organs 2006, 30:424-431.
11. von Versen-Höynck F., Hesselbarth U., Möller D.E. Application of sterilized human amnion for reconstruction of the ocular surface. Cell Tissue Bank 2004, 5:57-65.
12. Kruse F.E., Joussen A.M., Rohrschneider K., You L., Sinn B., Baumann J., et al. Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000, 238:68-75.
13. Rama P., Giannini R., Bruni A., Gatto C., Tiso R., Ponzin D. Further evaluation of amniotic membrane banking for transplantation in ocular surface diseases. Cell Tissue Bank 2001, 2:155-163.
14. Rodríguez-Ares M.T., López-Valladares M.J., Touriño R., Vieites B., Gude F., Silva M.T., et al. Effects of lyophilization on human amniotic membrane. Acta Ophthalmol 2009, 87:396-403.
15. Hill P., Brantley H., Van Dyke M. Some properties of keratin biomaterials: kerateines. Biomaterials 2010, 31:585-593.
16. Schrooyen P.M., Dijkstra P.J., Oberthür R.C., Bantjes A., Feijen J. Partially carboxymethylated feather keratins. 2. Thermal and mechanical properties of films. JAgric Food Chem 2001, 49:221-230.
17. Reichl S., Borrelli M., Geerling G. Keratin films for ocular surface reconstruction. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3375-3386.
18. Borrelli M., Reichl S., Feng Y., Schargus M., Schrader S., Geerling G. Invitro characterization and exvivo surgical evaluation of human hair keratin films in ocular surface reconstruction after sterilization processing. JMater Sci Mater Med 2013, 24:221-230.
19. Feng Y., Borrelli M., Meyer-Ter-Vehn T., Reichl S., Schrader S., Geerling G. Epithelial wound healing on keratin film, amniotic membrane and polystyrene invitro. Curr Eye Res 2014, 39:361-370.
20. Lai J.Y. The role of bloom index of gelatin on the interaction with retinal pigment epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci 2009, 10:3442-3456.
21. Nakamura A., Arimoto M., Takeuchi K., Fujii T. Arapid extraction procedure of human hair proteins and identification of phosphorylated species. Biol Pharm Bull 2002, 25:569-572.
22. Reichl S. Films based on human hair keratin as substrates for cell culture and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30:6854-6866.
23. Tseng S.C., Prabhasawat P., Lee S.H. Amniotic membrane transplantation for conjunctival surface reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 1997, 124:765-774.
24. Thomasen H., Pauklin M., Noelle B., Geerling G., Vetter J., Steven P., et al. The effect of long-term storage on the biological and histological properties of cryopreserved amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 2011, 36:247-255.
25. Riau A.K., Beuerman R.W., Lim L.S., Mehta J.S. Preservation, sterilization and de-epithelialization of human amniotic membrane for use in ocular surface reconstruction. Biomaterials 2010, 31:216-225.
26. Sitalakshmi G., Sudha B., Madhavan H.N., Vinay S., Krishnakumar S., Mori Y., et al. Exvivo cultivation of corneal limbal epithelial cells in a thermoreversible polymer (Mebiol Gel) and their transplantation in rabbits: an animal model. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:407-415.
27. Irvine A.R., Kimura S.J. Experimental stromal herpes simplex keratitis in rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol 1967, 78:654-663.
28. Verma V., Verma P., Ray P., Ray A.R. Preparation of scaffolds from human hair proteins for tissue-engineering applications. Biomed Mater 2008, 3:025007.
29. Yamauchi K., Maniwa M., Mori T. Cultivation of fibroblast cells on keratin-coated substrata. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 1998, 9:259-270.
30. Tachibana A., Furuta Y., Takeshima H., Tanabe T., Yamauchi K. Fabrication of wool keratin sponge scaffolds for long-term cell cultivation. JBiotechnol 2002, 93:165-170.
31. Srinivasan B., Kumar R., Shanmugam K., Sivagnam U.T., Reddy N.P., Sehgal P.K. Porous keratin scaffold-promising biomaterial for tissue engineering and drug delivery. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010, 92:5-12.
32. Sierpinski P., Garrett J., Ma J., Apel P., Klorig D., Smith T., et al. The use of keratin biomaterials derived from human hair for the promotion of rapid regeneration of peripheral nerves. Biomaterials 2008, 29:118-128.
33. Saul J.M., Ellenburg M.D., de Guzman R.C., Van Dyke M. Keratin hydrogels support the sustained release of bioactive ciprofloxacin. JBiomed Mater Res A 2011, 98:544-553.
34. Pechter P.M., Gil J., Valdes J., Tomic-Canic M., Pastar I., Stojadinovic O., et al. Keratin dressing speed epithelialization of deep partial-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2012, 20:236-242.
35. Rahmany M.B., Hantgan R.R., Van Dyke M. Amechanistic investigation of the effect of keratin-based hemostatic agents on coagulation. Biomaterials 2013, 34:2492-2500.
36. Dias G.J., Peplow P.V., McLaughlin A., Teixeira F., Kelly R.J. Biocompatibility and osseointegration of reconstituted keratin in an ovine model. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 92:513-520.
37. Peplow P.V., Dias G.J., Teixeira F., Kelly R.J. Tissue reaction to matrices of reconstituted keratin polymer implanted subcutaneously in sheep. JBiomed Mater Res A 2009, 89:255-265.
38. de Guzman R.C., Merrill M.R., Richter J.R., Hamzi R.I., Greengauz-Roberts O.K., Van Dyke M.E. Mechanical and biological properties of keratose biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011, 32:8205-8217.
39. Tanabe T., Okitsu N., Tachibana A., Yamauchi K. Preparation and characterization of keratin-chitosan composite film. Biomaterials 2002, 23:817-825.
40. Sando L., Kim M., Colgrave M.L., Ramshaw J.A., Werkmeister J.A., Elvin C.M. Photochemical crosslinking of soluble wool keratins produces a mechanically stable biomaterial that support cell adhesion and proliferation. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 95:901-911.
41. Shen D., Wang X., Zhang L., Zhao X., Li J., Cheng K., et al. The amelioration of cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction by injection of keratin biomaterials derived from human hair. Biomaterials 2011, 32:9290-9299.
42. Pace L.A., Plate J.F., Smith T.L., Van Dyke M.E. The effect of human hair keratin hydrogels on early cellular response to sciatic nerve injury in a rat model. Biomaterials 2013, 34:5907-5914.
43. Williams D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2941-2953.
44. Luttikhuizen D.T., Harmsen M.C., Van Luyn M.J. Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:1955-1970.
45. Anderson J.M., Rodriguez A., Chang D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008, 20:86-100.
46. Brown B.N., Ratner B.D., Goodman S.B., Amar S., Badylak S.F. Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcome in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 2012, 33:3792-3802.
47. Badylak S.F., Valentin J.E., Ravindra A.K., McCabe G.P., Stewart-Akers A.M. Macrophage phenotype as determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng Part A 2008, 14:1835-1842.
48. Valentin J.E., Stewart-Akers A.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. Macrophage participation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:1687-1694.
49. Fearing B.V., Van Dyke M.E. Invitro response of macrophage polarization to a keratin biomaterial. Acta Biomater 2014, 10:3136-3144.
50. Valherie I., Gagnieu C. Chemical modification of keratins: preparation of biomaterials and study of their physical, physiochemical and biological properties 1992, Inst Natl Sci Appl Lyon, France, [Doctoral thesis].
51. Katoh K., Shibayama M., Tanabe T., Yamauchi K. Preparation and physicochemical properties of compression-molded keratin films. Biomaterials 2004, 25:2265-2272.
52. Hill P., Brantley H., Van Dyke M. Some properties of keratin biomaterial: kerateines. Biomaterials 2010, 31:585-593.
53. Espana E.M., Acosta A.C., Stoiber J., Fernandez V., Lamar P.D., Villain F.L., et al. Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits: an immunofluorescence study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011, 249:253-260.
54. Wilhelmus K.R. The Draize eye test. Surv Ophthalmol 2001, 45:493-515.