Revealing the nature of SCMC interaction

Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 197-217

  Smith, Bryan ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919559836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880852     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209-236.
2. Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning and Technology, 1, 19-43.
3. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
5. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
6. Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in SLA. In J. Williams & B. Van Patten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168-196.
9. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 102-120.
10. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker-non-native speaker conversations in the second language classroom. In M.A. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82 (pp. 207-225). Washington, DC: TESOL.
11. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-67.
13. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
14. Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.
15. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about secondlanguage learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
16. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, Avon:Multilingual Matters.
17. Salaberry, R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computermediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 5-27.
18. Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory and production processes. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Perez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish (pp. 41-56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press..
19. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self-and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-457.
20. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
21. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
22. Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 33-58.
23. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning and Technology, 12, 85-103.
24. Smith, B., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by usability lab technologies: New interpretations. System, 32, 553-575.
25. Swain, M. K. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
26. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1985). Nonnative-nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
28. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Zhao, Y., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., Smith, B., & Tan, S. (2004). The non-neutrality of technology: A theoretical analysis and empirical study of computer mediated communication technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 23-55.