On Spivak: Theorizing resistance-applying Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak in public relations

Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 278-300

  Dutta, Mohan Jyoti ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919508510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203883235     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Berger, B. K. (2005). Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections of public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 5-28.
2. Boal, A. (1985). Theater of the oppressed (C. A. & M. L. McBride, Trans.). New York: Theater Communications Group.
3. Boal, A. (1998). Legislative theatre (A. Jackson, Trans.). London and New York:Routledge.
4. Botan, C., & Hazleton, V. (1989). Public relations theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Botan, C., & Hazleton, V. (2006). Public relations theory II. New York: Routledge.
6. Broadfoot, K., & Munshi, D. (2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities:Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 249-267.
7. Conquergood, D. (1982a). Communication as performance: Dramaturgical dimensions of everyday life. In J. I. Sisco (Ed.), The Jensin lectures: Contemporary communication studies (pp. 24-43). Tampa: University of South Florida Press.
8. Conquergood, D. (1982b). Performing as a moral act: Ethical dimensions of the ethnography of performance. Literature in Performance, 5, 1-13.
9. Conquergood, D. (1988). Health theater in a Hmong refugee camp. The Drama Review, 32, 174-208.
10. Conquergood, D. (1989). Poetics, play, process, and power: The performative turn in anthropology. Text and Performance Quarterly, 9, 82-88.
11. Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
12. Curtin, P. A., & Gaither, T. K. (2006). Contested notions of issue identity in international public relations: A case study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18, 67-89.
13. Dutta, M. (2006). Theoretical approaches to entertainment education: A subaltern critique. Health Communication, 20, 221-231.
14. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2005). Civil society and public relations: Not so civil after all. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 267-289.
15. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2006). U.S. public diplomacy in the Middle East: A critical approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30, 102-124.
16. Harasym, S. (Ed.). (1990). The postcolonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. New York: Routledge.
17. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-37.
18. Kim, I., & Dutta, M. (in press). A subaltern studies approach to crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research.
19. Kruckeberg, D., & Starck, K. (1988). Public relations and community: A reconstructed story. New York: Praeger.
20. Landry, D., & MacLean, G. (1996). The Spivak reader. New York: Routledge.
21. Munshi, D. (1999). Requisitioning variety: Photographic metaphors, ethnocentric lenses, and the divided colours of public relations. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 1, 39-51.
22. Munshi, D., & Kurian, P. (2005). Imperializing spin cycles: A postcolonial look at public relations, greenwashing and the separation of publics. Public Relations Review, 31, 513-520.
23. Pal, M., & Dutta, M. (2008a). Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 159-179.
24. Pal, M., & Dutta, M. (2008b). Theorizing resistance in a global context: Processes, strategies, and tactics in communication scholarship. Communication Yearbook, 32, 41-87.
25. Pratt, C. (2006). Reformulating the emerging theory of corporate social responsibility as good governance. In C. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 249-277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Said, E. (1988). Foreword. In R. Guha & G. C. Spivak (Eds.), Selected subaltern studies (pp. v-xii). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientation. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
28. Shome, R., & Hegde, S. R. (2002). Postcolonial approaches to communication:Charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 12, 249-270.
29. Spivak, G. C. (1987). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics (R. Guha, Ed.). London: Methuen.
30. Spivak, G. C. (1990a). The post-colonial critic. The postcolonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues (S. Harasym, Ed., pp. 67-74). New York: Routledge.
31. Spivak, G. C. (1990b). Questions of multi-culturalism. The postcolonial critic:Interviews, strategies, dialogues (S. Harasym, Ed., pp. 59-66). New York:Routledge.
32. Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine: Toward a history of the vanishing present. London: Routledge.
33. Spivak, G. C. (1996). Bonding in difference: Interview with Alfred Arteaga. In D. Landry & G. MacLean (Eds.), The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (pp. 15-28). New York: Routledge.
34. Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Spivak, G. C. (2003). Death of a discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (2003). A theoretical framework for global public relations research and practice. In K. Sriramesh & D. Verčič (Eds.), The global public relations handbook (pp. 1-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Taylor, M., & Kent, M. (2006). Public relations theory and practice in nation building. In C. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 341-359). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27, 263-284.
39. Toth, E. (2002). Postmodernism for modernist public relations: The cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 243-250.